Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For crumpets unlike the factory specimen try this:

Hugely satisfying to make. Makes 12. (Crumpet rings are those things some cafes use in which to fry eggs)


450g plain white flour

350ml warm milk

350ml warm water (approximately)

5g powdered dried yeast

10g salt

1 tsp baking powder

A little sunflower or vegetable oil

In a bowl, whisk the flour, milk, water and yeast into a rather runny batter the

consistency of single cream. Cover with cling-film and leave for an hour until

really bubbly (or three to four hours, if need be).

Heat a heavy-based frying pan or flat griddle over a medium-high heat. Whisk

the salt and baking powder into the batter. Lightly grease the crumpet rings

and pan. Put one ring in the pan, fill to just below the top ? the batter should

stay in the ring and lots of holes should appear on the surface after a minute

or two. (If it dribbles out underneath, it is too thin, so whisk a little more flour

into your batter mix. If lots of holes don't form, it's too thick, so whisk in some

water.) Assuming your test crumpet is OK, after five minutes or so, when the

surface is just set, flip it over, ring and all. (If the cooked base seems too dark,

turn down the heat.) Cook for two to three minutes, until golden on the other

side. Repeat with the remaining batter in batches. Butter and eat at once, or

cool on a wire rack for toasting later.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9075-crumpets/#findComment-274448
Share on other sites

Toasted on both sides so slightly crunchy, top with a spread of apricot jam, yum, yum or if you are my husband, every weekend I make him toasted crumpets (both sides) mushrooms, put them on top of crumpet, slice of cheese on top and pop under the grill. Ham or bacon can be added, lovely :))
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9075-crumpets/#findComment-274458
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What do you base those statements on?
    • I suppose I'd assume that Councillor McCash, who is, as I recall, a self-confessed revolutionary Marxist, had hoped to take Southwark Labour down his chosen route - when he lost his leadership bid he must then have been looking for a party which shared his ultra-left views (ultra-left at least in the light of Starmer's interpretation of socialism). The Greens, for him, clearly fit that role. After that his timing was all about benefiting his chosen (new) party - at least he didn't stand for Labour and then defect giving the Greens an unexpected 3 year seat. As someone who doesn't share the wings of his political position I don't wish him well (politically) - but neither do I wish him ill as a 'punishment' for his defection.  
    • Agree with all the sentiments above. Hope it doesn't change too much and above all I really hope it stays independent and avoids becoming the same as all the chain pubs in the area.
    • This move won't advance his career in Southwark. He'll have to leave the cabinet now for a couple of months and won't get back on it in May. He might win a council seat but the Greens won't win control of the council and Labour won't have him anywhere near the levers of power. His only (and presumably intended) route for advancement will be for the Greens to offer him PCC seat somewhere in the general election in 2029. By then the Greens will be toast. They might even be finished by this Friday if they don't win the Gorton by-election. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...