Jump to content

Recommended Posts



Bob, these adjectives could be construed to be offensive. I'm a vegetarian which is not quite a Vegan but I wonder if you know the difference and if it would matter anyway? As for people with dreadlocks...........so what! Sulky.......have you never been 'sulky'? Teens..........well they would be between the ages of 13 and 19. Nothing they can do about that is there.


Bottom line is if you don't like the music you don't like it. I don't. By the way both parties are tied to Sony so Simon what's his name will hardly give a fu*k. about it.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Clearly he believes 'Killing In The Name' to be

> some sort of polar opposite to Joe McElderry's

> 'The Climb'. As it happens, they're simply two

> sides of the same musical dog chod - and given the

> choice I don't want either of them.



Well erm... duh. That doesn't really need saying though does it?


Confounding the efforts or at least the expectations of the general idiotic gaggle of humanity is funny though. And it is worthwhile to assert now and again that not everyone buys into the same shit.


But you guys insist on taking it seriously so,


I wouldn?t describe myself as a Rage fan either. They take themselves way too seriously for dancing monkeys. Their first album was genre defining however but then they released Evil Empire which showed that they were one trick ponies.


I made an effort to watch the X factor this year though and as far as ?entertainment? goes it is a whole new universe of shit. It redefines the laws of shitness. And at the end of the day there is some twt in charge of it who has engineered some sort of national tradition out of the whole thing which is a testament to the celebrated mental retardation embraced by popular culture.


This sort of thing is just the same as a heckle of ?W@NKER? as a politician walks passed. A vocal display of social annoyance at someone being a w@nker.


You don?t have to like the song or love the band or some shit to appreciate the idea.


Once again, erm... duh.

A number one for Simon Cowell and a record which is number one because of Simon Cowell are still both number ones for Simon Cowell - in any sense that matters.


Does his ego really more of a boost? Oh.. you think it does? Then download that 'Rage' track right now.



If you download it enough times he may even employ you as his personal fluffer.

My friends have a single out at the moment. Can we cause a genuine upset by getting four unknowns for Dublin to number one at christmas.

Genuinely lovely lads too and I don't think Simon cowell will make a penny out of the deal.

The song's ok too if you like travis meets radiohead via U2.


Hmm. Did I mention they're really nice guys?

Yep hence why I never went into advertising after failing with my macdonalds slogan

"let's face it's fucking awful food but sometimes you can't help but do the wrong thing, go on be a twat"


any for what it's worth here's their obligatory myspace thingy

http://www.myspace.com/pilotlightmusic

if all eight people Reading this thread go out and download the single off iTunes they will make it to number 173 in the charts


it's called "Pulling on Doors that Say Push"

Perfect Mr Mockney,


I have no idea what you are talking about with regard to "pulling on doors that say push" and I would like to remind you that I am a married lady. However, I am prepared to ignore your filth and inuendo, and when I return from my Brazilian Blow Dry treatment this afternoon, I shall ask the au pair to assist me with the purchase the single you describe, while raising a glass to poking Simon Cowell in the eye!


I understand that they no longer sell records in Woolworths and I must do something swizzy online - I am such a technophobe (sigh)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surely the main issue for Dulwich Village is their retail offer, like most of Dulwich Village,  is desperately dull and a bit basic.  Not really worth anyone from outside of Dulwich Village travelling for. 
    • It's a case of who blinks first.  But  purchasers who do this will lose all good will form the owner and will probably suffer aife changing accident as the Gods won't be smiling on them.
    • well - that is disappointing. We know the impact of foreign buyers on the housing market.
    • I much prefer Romeo Jones to >spit< Gail's, but I'm struggling to blame this on the LTN when nothing outside Romeo Jones has changed, the LTN came in 5 (!!!) years ago, and Gail's has queues out the door most days. It also is directly opposite Rocca (which serves coffee and has seating), next door to Porters (which serves coffee and has seating), a few doors along from Real Greek (which serves coffee and has seating), and diagonally across from Gail's (which serves coffee and sells baked goods and has seating). I'll be sorry to see Romeo Jones go (not least because I have a stack of stamped loyalty cards). I don't want to criticise small business owners because it's a tough old racket, but DVillage never really seemed to find its niche either as a proper deli (like La Gastronomia or The Sicilian in West Dulwich) or as a coffee shop (which is difficult when you have Megan's and Redemption right next to you, and Au Ciel around the corner).
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...