Jump to content

Recommended Posts



Bob, these adjectives could be construed to be offensive. I'm a vegetarian which is not quite a Vegan but I wonder if you know the difference and if it would matter anyway? As for people with dreadlocks...........so what! Sulky.......have you never been 'sulky'? Teens..........well they would be between the ages of 13 and 19. Nothing they can do about that is there.


Bottom line is if you don't like the music you don't like it. I don't. By the way both parties are tied to Sony so Simon what's his name will hardly give a fu*k. about it.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Clearly he believes 'Killing In The Name' to be

> some sort of polar opposite to Joe McElderry's

> 'The Climb'. As it happens, they're simply two

> sides of the same musical dog chod - and given the

> choice I don't want either of them.



Well erm... duh. That doesn't really need saying though does it?


Confounding the efforts or at least the expectations of the general idiotic gaggle of humanity is funny though. And it is worthwhile to assert now and again that not everyone buys into the same shit.


But you guys insist on taking it seriously so,


I wouldn?t describe myself as a Rage fan either. They take themselves way too seriously for dancing monkeys. Their first album was genre defining however but then they released Evil Empire which showed that they were one trick ponies.


I made an effort to watch the X factor this year though and as far as ?entertainment? goes it is a whole new universe of shit. It redefines the laws of shitness. And at the end of the day there is some twt in charge of it who has engineered some sort of national tradition out of the whole thing which is a testament to the celebrated mental retardation embraced by popular culture.


This sort of thing is just the same as a heckle of ?W@NKER? as a politician walks passed. A vocal display of social annoyance at someone being a w@nker.


You don?t have to like the song or love the band or some shit to appreciate the idea.


Once again, erm... duh.

A number one for Simon Cowell and a record which is number one because of Simon Cowell are still both number ones for Simon Cowell - in any sense that matters.


Does his ego really more of a boost? Oh.. you think it does? Then download that 'Rage' track right now.



If you download it enough times he may even employ you as his personal fluffer.

My friends have a single out at the moment. Can we cause a genuine upset by getting four unknowns for Dublin to number one at christmas.

Genuinely lovely lads too and I don't think Simon cowell will make a penny out of the deal.

The song's ok too if you like travis meets radiohead via U2.


Hmm. Did I mention they're really nice guys?

Yep hence why I never went into advertising after failing with my macdonalds slogan

"let's face it's fucking awful food but sometimes you can't help but do the wrong thing, go on be a twat"


any for what it's worth here's their obligatory myspace thingy

http://www.myspace.com/pilotlightmusic

if all eight people Reading this thread go out and download the single off iTunes they will make it to number 173 in the charts


it's called "Pulling on Doors that Say Push"

Perfect Mr Mockney,


I have no idea what you are talking about with regard to "pulling on doors that say push" and I would like to remind you that I am a married lady. However, I am prepared to ignore your filth and inuendo, and when I return from my Brazilian Blow Dry treatment this afternoon, I shall ask the au pair to assist me with the purchase the single you describe, while raising a glass to poking Simon Cowell in the eye!


I understand that they no longer sell records in Woolworths and I must do something swizzy online - I am such a technophobe (sigh)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They've left all kinds of things in my garden including gardening gloves and shoes, not to mention scavenged food and packaging. Once they left an unopened vacuum pack of smoked trout, the next day some pita bread. All a bit biblical.
    • From memory foxes only became a regular sight in the 90s, the attached article says they first appeared in the 30s becoming far more common in the 80s.  Apparently, whilst we think that urban foxes live longer than rural due to their 'easy' life few will make it over the age of two.  In towns they are far more crowded than their natural habitat where they are more territorial. I've never seen foxes and cats fighting but once saw two cats squaring up to each other and a watching fox went up and butted its head against one of the cats.  There's a video on youtube of a cat and fox facing off when the cat is eating outside, but it wont let me embed on this post.  Get too close and I'll scratch you. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/15/urban-foxes-are-they-fantastic-or-a-growing-menace My main issue is leaving things out like gardening gloves and they go or are shredded.  One stole a bag of bird food in front of me, took it next door, shredded the bag and then left it.  
    • I was trying to remember when Franklins moved to Lordship Lane from Walworth Road where it was combined with an antique/bric a brac shop. Mid 1990s, first wave ED gentrification?
    • Hello, I lost a babies blanket between Tessa Jowell and the Picture House on Lordship Lane 😞It is teal colour with the name Cillian embroidered on it.  If anyone sees/finds it please let me know.  Thank you! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...