Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't really regard breaking the law in a number of dangerous ways trivial.

The only thing trivial is your silly response.

"BUT MAYBE THEY WERE ONLY THERE BECAUSE YOU WERE TOO LAZY AND INCONSIDERATE TO PARK YOUR CAR PROPERLY IN THE FIRST INSTANCE" - I was standing outside my house nowhere near my car. They were not there because of anything I did.


Driving while using a mobile phone is the cause of lord knows how many accidents every year. Not sure about abysmally dangerous parking but it if it wasn't a problem it wouldn't be regulated agains.

The reason I get annoyed (and so do a lot of other people) is that those enforcing the law should not think that they are above it but frequently do. There is nothing wrong with carrying out our duty as taxpayers and citizens to ensure that those who we pay to enforce our laws also abide by them.



sniffy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > > Edited 2 time(s). Last edit was today,

> 11:24pm

> > by sniffy.

> >

> > You had to edit that 2 times, Sniffy?? Was it

> not

> > wildly deranged enough or badly punctuated

> enough

> > on the first two attempts? Not enough question

> > marks or exclamation marks to get the point

> > across?

>

> ------------------------------------------------

> For sure, something like that ;)

> Really though, some people just whinge about the

> most trivial things...

> When quite possibly they're in the wrong in the

> first instance?

> Just MHO

>

> All peace and good will kind of stuff

> x

Gimme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't really regard breaking the law in a number

> of dangerous ways trivial.

> The only thing trivial is your silly response.

> "BUT MAYBE THEY WERE ONLY THERE BECAUSE YOU WERE

> TOO LAZY AND INCONSIDERATE TO PARK YOUR CAR

> PROPERLY IN THE FIRST INSTANCE" - I was standing

> outside my house nowhere near my car. They were

> not there because of anything I did.


Ok fair enough. You did state however, that you had been ticketed for parking in a loading bay which you then later spotted traffic warden using?


That aside, when people are 'tempted' to park illegally it is usually because there are few/no 'legal' places left to park.


So, by definition there will be no places left for parking wardens when they really need to do their job?


"The reason I get annoyed (and so do a lot of other people) is that those enforcing the law should not think that they are above it but frequently do. There is nothing wrong with carrying out our duty as taxpayers and citizens to ensure that those who we pay to enforce our laws also abide by them."


So for example, do you really expect the Police to stay within the standard realms of the law when going about their business? like staying within speed limits whilst chasing speeding stolen cars?

Surely they must be allowed extended powers in order to effectively carry out their job.

Futile otherwise?

If everyone stayed within the law, they wouldn't be forced to go beyond it in order to penalise/catch us?


Please don't get me wrong, I hate getting parking tickets, but when i do.... well it's mostly my own fault of course!

And finally, to agree with you on at least one point :) I absolutely hate people who use mobiles whilst driving...


S/

I don't think traffic wardens are necessarily the servants of society you make them out to be. Many of them use predatory tactics, or give tickets to people who are parked legally - just in case they get away with it.


And coming to think of it - why do traffic wardens in London need to use cars anyway?

Can you find out from 'Lord' exactly how many accidents are caused by Mobiles? Im sure they DO cause accidents.

Also what about Police on their radios does this cause accidents? Taxi drivers talking to Control Etc. Is the Radio bad to?

I wonder. I know listening to Enigma sends me to sleep and Bat out of Hell wakes me up!

Someone using their phone ran into the back of my bike (pedal bike) in a transit van at a roundabout last year so I know they do cause accidents for sure. He couldn't have missed me if he was concentrating. I was only wearing a high viz jacket and 2 flashing lights....



the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can you find out from 'Lord' exactly how many

> accidents are caused by Mobiles? Im sure they DO

> cause accidents.

> Also what about Police on their radios does this

> cause accidents? Taxi drivers talking to Control

> Etc. Is the Radio bad to?

> I wonder. I know listening to Enigma sends me to

> sleep and Bat out of Hell wakes me up!

I'd still like the figures- Incidentally I nearly hit a bike today with only one flashing light - . It looked like a reflection from the side of the road. I expect two Flashing lights would be better. Don't they do proper lights for bikes anymore?
You have my sympathy. Southwark parking wardens are terrible. I got a penalty charge notice for sitting in my car for five minutes while i waited to pick my friend up. This was on a closed off road on elm grove-there is no traffic whatsoever there-there are no cars there!!!!!! Their cameras spotted me for being parked over 50cm form the double yellow. Didn't even get out the car. If you know the area you will know this is daylight robbery. I would rather be mugged for ?60 as I would feel less violated...

And the abuse of position goes on. Right on the junction of Lordship Lane and Hansler Road, one of Southwark Parking's Orwellian camera cars, parked on double-yellows, engine running, in a position blocking motorists' views left. This is a tricky sightline even when cars are parked legally and I suspect that if the police, or a civil (as opposed to council) traffic warden saw this you'd end up with endorsements. Outrageous.


http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/5001/carkz.th.jpg


BTW, after over 30 mins, the car is still there, engine running. I think that's an offence too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...