Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There are grammars in Sutton that you can apply for - Wallington and Nonsuch are the girls' schools I believe. Not too hard by train - I think from Forest Hill.

Those two are in theory easier to get into than Newstead.

Bexley has grammars too but less easily accessible by train, including Chiselhust and Sidcup GS - co-ed.

Growlybear Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The catchment area for Newstead Wood is only 9

> miles, so Peckham would be quite some way outside

> the limit.


Depends where in SE15. We're by Peckham Rye Park and the 'as the crow flies' distance to Newstead Wood is under 9 miles.

Or you may wish to consider a high performing non-selective or partially selective school?


Top 65 schools within 9 miles of SE15 sorted by percentage of 5 or more GCSEs including Maths and English with results above 70%.


* are completely selective


*The Henrietta Barnett School 100%

*Newstead Wood School 100%

*Sutton Grammar School 100%

*Wallington County Grammar School 100%

*Wilson's School 100%

*Wallington High School for Girls 99%

*Chislehurst and Sidcup Grammar School 98%

*Beths Grammar School 97%

*Bexley Grammar School 97%

*Woodford County High School 97%

Ark King Solomon Academy 95%

Bethnal Green Academy 90%

The London Oratory School 87%

Twyford Church of England High School 87%

Coloma Convent Girls' School 87%

The Grey Coat Hospital 85%

Langley Park School for Girls 85%

Sacred Heart High School 85%

Graveney School 84%

La Retraite Roman Catholic Girls' School 84%

Harris City Academy Crystal Palace 83%

Mossbourne Community Academy 83%

The Cardinal Vaughan Memorial RC School 83%

St Thomas More Roman Catholic Comprehensive School 83%

The St Marylebone CofE School 82%

Ursuline High School Wimbledon 82%

St Catherine's Catholic School 81%

Bishop Thomas Grant Catholic Secondary School 81%

Bullers Wood School 80%

Coombe Girls' School 80%

The Charter School 79%

Kingsdale Foundation School 79%

Alexandra Park School 78%

The Ursuline Academy Ilford 78%

Central Foundation Boys' School 78%

La Sainte Union Catholic Secondary School 78%

Hayes School 77%

The Camden School for Girls 77%

Brampton Manor Academy 76%

Langley Park School for Boys 76%

Fortismere School 76%

St Angela's Ursuline School 76%

St Philomena's School 76%

Darrick Wood School 75%

Glenthorne High School 75%

Sacred Heart Catholic School 75%

Harris Girls' Academy East Dulwich 75%

Swanlea School 75%

Sir John Cass Foundation and Redcoat Church of England Secondary School 75%

Fulham Cross Girls' School and Language College 74%

Holland Park School 74%

St Michael's Catholic College 74%

St Mary Magdalene Academy 74%

Oaklands School 74%

Lady Margaret School 73%

Harris Academy Falconwood 73%

Walthamstow School for Girls 73%

The John Fisher School 73%

St Ursula's Convent School 73%

Woolwich Polytechnic School 72%

The City Academy, Hackney 72%

Morpeth School 72%

Seven Kings School 72%

Prendergast School 72%

Dunraven School 71%

You can try for a selective place at Graveney from anywhere: 60 places a year are allocated on the results of the Wandsworth test. (You don't have to live in Wandsworth to take the test).

Bizarrely they have just re-introduced priority admission criteria for siblings of selective places. No wonder the catchment for distance places is so tiny.

The eason I posted the list is because


I. I wanted to show all high performing schools within 9 miles, some of which are non-selective

Ii. i thought the OP might find it useful - which, apparently, they did.


I personally am not a fan of selection, but I try and be helpful where I can. Makes the days go by quicker, generally. Sadly I didn't have a chance to go through the wide variety of catchment areas, and selection policies of the schools concerned, but it appears other posters will.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...