Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Libby Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3435938/It

> -s-double-width-people-carrier-two-bedrooms-s-priv

> ate-parking-space-10ft-wide-property-hits-market-8

> 00-000.html


Foxtons - of course....

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-57565901.html

Foxtons are fools. For the same money you can get a 3 bedroom house with garden on a quieter street in the same area.

http://www.zoopla.co.uk/for-sale/details/39264005?search_identifier=c6c05e8a079c4d00965e9239fe577e0f#mV3hIAHEQWHqUwEf.97

davidallotey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Foxton's are like a virus with no cure and that's

> what is wrong with everything in London.If you

> ever shake hands with anybody who work's for

> them,wash as soon as or your life is over as you

> know it.


A perfect match for the Daily Mail in that case. I'm surprised they haven't blamed the expense on carcinogenic Muslim Romanian health and safety officers on benefits.

I had a look on the ordinance survey maps to and until around 1950 it seems it was a pathway to some land behind. Doesn't say for what use. So an added on garage makes far more sense than a coach house. I half wonder if that label was also to sell the property as something it never was, for effect. All of it is ridiculous though.

I know this flat is in Brixton, but it's symptomatic of the housing 'boom' in our neck of the woods. Unbelievably, it's on the market with a guide price between ?350 and ?400. See the photo and weep.


http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-54400079.html

YummyMummy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Although the total sq ft is over 800 which isn't

> too bad, it's just a very narrow building, it's

> goes back quite far!


Really? 800 sqft is the space I'd expect in a 2 bed flat for 550-600K.


I have no problem with someone building a house there - or trying to flog it - but the price is daft.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Great answer, but how do you then square it up with pension pots investments without adversely impacting future growth.  Buit of a tricky one as on one hand it should be nationalised but on the other we don't want to see future pension poverty relying on government top ups.  Far too complicated for a simple answer   
    • Driving down one of the side streets near the park last night we saw a group of kids in front holding a rope across the road. Did feel a little anxious and then when we got closer it turned out to be a harmless trick - nothing in the road/dangerous, just three kids on each side holding long twigs as if they were tugging a rope between them. i'm conflicted - quite a theatrical prank (I presume copied from online) but given the location could well have been the same group mentioned above. 
    • I have no idea, but not so difficult for one of them to stand to the side and record. In an odd way at least if they were doing it for social media it might explain the motivation, albeit misguided. Others may disagree, but that feels less worrying than a desire to intimidate.   I think comparable games like "knock down ginger" where children run away and/or momentarily stick their tongue out as cheeky gesture, have a different vibe to what is described here.
    • Not sure where you live, but 42 (from Dulwich Sainsburys) or 78 (from Peckham) go to Tower Bridge.  Bit of a long winded journey, but gets you there.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...