Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Does anybody know the very latest re: the London Bridge-Victoria train service.

I read that South Eastern trains is planning to withdraw this service from 2012 - too shocking for me to compute !

Does anybody have any more up to date/reliable information ?

Also, any advice on the most effective way to continue lobbying for this decision to be reversed ?

I wrote to South Eastern about a year ago when this plan was first mooted - and then hoped it had gone away.

There are heaps of posts about this on another thread but I will add that I saw Mayor Boris yesterday talking about a London train circle route which would include I would have thought Victoria to London Bridge, so why get rid of it. Anyway, search for the other thread.

The decision to close the South London Line has been jointly taken by the Mayor of London Boris Johnson and Governments Transport Secretary.

The outer circle train line proposed would probably be a combination of the North London Line and East London Line phase 2. It wont help SLL.

American Robin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does anybody know the very latest re: the London

> Bridge-Victoria train service.

> Also, any advice on the most effective way to

> continue lobbying for this decision to be reversed

> ?


Hi American Robin - this might help:

* See Southwark Rail Users? Group *stop rail cuts campaign* web page here http://www.bellenden.net/rail-cuts for a comprehensive summary of the campaign actions, news, achievements and background.

* If you use one of the rail stations in Southwark, do please email [email protected] to join the SRUG mailing list. We need as many users as possible to be easily contactable.

  • 1 month later...

The latest up date I have on the TfL/London TravelWatch South london Line study.


Five options being reviewed. None of them keep the SLL.


Option 1 : modified East London Line service from Dalston Junction of 4 trains per hour - 2 trains to Clapham Junction and 2 trains to Victoria


Option 2 : modified East London Line service from Dalston Junction of 6 trains per hour ? 4 trains to Clapham Junction and 2 trains to Victoria


Option 3 : A 2 trains per hour service between Victoria and Bellingham.


Option 4 : A package of measures: Additional stops in 2 of the 4 existing Orpington ? Victoria services at Clapham High Street & Wandsworth Road stations outside of peak times AND additional stops in the 2 trains per hour Gillingham or Dover / Ramsgate services at Peckham Rye & Denmark Hill stations.


Option 5 : A package of measures: An additional service of 2 trains per hour between Hither Green and Victoria at peak times AND running of the existing two trains per hour Dartford ? Victoria service all day, every day, which would also stop at Clapham High Street & Wandsworth Road stations outside of peak times.


Analysis of these five options will complete in Mid March which will then be reviewed with Network Rail and the Dept of Transport. My hunch would be that as the SLL protests have gone quiet the report will be held back until after national elections - sure prudah will be stated.

Then local Labour MPs will be safe for another 4-5 years while the service is queitly retired with above options having 'technical' reasons for not progressing. I'm having a bad cynical day.

Hi mikese22,

Do you mean the Rail Utilisation Study consultation?

Certainly no consultation broadcast to residents in London. If you were really in the know you might have found a consultation. As an elected representative I've never been consulted. The council were consulted and made it views crystal clear.


Huge social disbenefits of isolating large swathes of South London from direct train services to where jobs are located in Victoria and London Bridge.

Who in East Dulwich has a strong desire to commute to Dalston the alternative being proposed?


I've attached the Save the South London Line latest short report.

  • 1 month later...

Boris Johnson is deciding this month whether to axe the South London Line. The link below lets you send him a letter to ask him to reconsider and only takes about 1 minute to do. If it is something you care about I think it would be 1 minute well spent.


http://www.facebook.com/l/f1266;www.southlondonpress.co.uk/tn/mayorletter.cfm

So when the tallest building in Europe is about to open on his doorstep the Mayor is thinking about reducing the transport links into it! Arse/elbow anyone? I guess Boris will just rely on that old Tory strap line and tell everyone to "get on their bikes"! (Which I would be more than happy to do if I didn't think the thing will be nicked as soon as I've locked it up).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...