Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Really, shouldn't you be calling for a

> clampdown on local snoopers. Unless you're a

> little bit jealous of course.


Erm...I presume your tongue is firmly in your cheek? It sounded to me as though HAL9000 was joking.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Declan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Really, shouldn't you be calling for a

> > clampdown on local snoopers. Unless you're a

> > little bit jealous of course.

>

> Erm...I presume your tongue is firmly in your

> cheek? It sounded to me as though HAL9000 was

> joking.


Yes......I know Hal was joking too.


*sighs and wonders if he is too obscure*

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Yes......I know Hal was joking too.

>

> *sighs and wonders if he is too obscure*



Well that's just fine and dandy...apologies for suggesting otherwise...and no, you're not obscure - though perhaps (as suggested by brum) a winky smiley thingamijig might have assisted on this occasion.


*breathes a sigh of relief and raises a glass of uisce beatha in Declan's direction*

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The picture of the 1960 M.O.T. shows the

> passengers are in the back demonstrating the extra

> stress to the susspesion under special

> circumstances that might arise.

> It was thought at the time this would not happen,

> so was not added to the items to be examined.



I think you have a great memory for someone your age computedshorty. Hope the streets of ED weren't like this in the 'old days'....xx

I had a shag in the back of my car many years ago and was caught by the milkman .....



.... the next day, only because I failed to dispose of the used condom correctly and it was stuck hanging ut of the rear door (sealed end showing) for all to see....


He didn't let me live that down for years (I have since moved away from where I was living then in shame)

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The picture of the 1960 M.O.T. shows the

> passengers are in the back demonstrating the extra

> stress to the susspesion under special

> circumstances that might arise.

> It was thought at the time this would not happen,

> so was not added to the items to be examined.


________________________________________________________________



You are full of sh!te aren't you C.S


Ok what car make & model is that , Hm ?


Oh & that's photo is earlier than the vague old 60s BTW so it pre dates the actual MOT


Lastly it is on a rolling road but the men from the Ministry of Transport didn't wear a white lab coat


It was a Tan colour they wore .


Slipped the "old mans" mind did it, well give him a nudge



W**F

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You are full of sh!te aren't you C.S...

> Slipped the "old mans" mind did it, well give him

> a nudge



*affixes muzzle*


Now leave him/her alone...bad dog...tis just good clean fun...s/he aint doin no arm to no-one...you ear me? Now SIT!

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think we may have to have Woofie's nuts off. He

> is getting far too aggressive.


Oh Woofie just gets carried away...an excitable puppy that's all...but I have the phenobarbitol ready should the situation require it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just for information: I see that the Licensing Sub-committee has the Tesco application as item 1 on their 24 July meeting agenda.  https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=172&MId=8329. The officer's report to the committtee provides a good succinct summary.  I see, from (original) p.31 of the full public pack, that Tesco Legal Dept on 12 June reported that they'd agreed with the police's suggested conditions to be attached to the licence, and the police accordingly withdrew their own representation.  That leaves just one representation, from a member of the public, to be dealt with on the day. I still think it's not necessarily to be presumed that Tesco will definitely be taking over the premises.  I see that Poundland themselves were granted an off-sales licence on 21 Feb 2023, and surrendered it on 3 July 2025.  I'm not sure they actually ever used it themselves.  Did they? https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Statement of Licensing Policy 2021-2026.pdf is a full statement of the policy and its application, for thems as is interested.
    • I'm now just following David Peckham around, posting laughing emojis on all his comments.   
    • Well, quite. Do you know where your lad's going tonight?
    • I'd get rid of duty free shopping.  Nothing to do with tourist tax but something I hate.  All that glitz as you try to get through to Wetherspoons in the departure lounge.  No great savings over on line or even at times supermarkets, and the hypocrisy of selling cheap cancer sticks. Ok back to tourist tax  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...