Jump to content

Naughtiness on our streets

brum

By brum
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Really, shouldn't you be calling for a

> clampdown on local snoopers. Unless you're a

> little bit jealous of course.


Erm...I presume your tongue is firmly in your cheek? It sounded to me as though HAL9000 was joking.

Narnia

Narnia

Posted
Posted

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Declan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Really, shouldn't you be calling for a

> > clampdown on local snoopers. Unless you're a

> > little bit jealous of course.

>

> Erm...I presume your tongue is firmly in your

> cheek? It sounded to me as though HAL9000 was

> joking.


Yes......I know Hal was joking too.


*sighs and wonders if he is too obscure*

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Yes......I know Hal was joking too.

>

> *sighs and wonders if he is too obscure*



Well that's just fine and dandy...apologies for suggesting otherwise...and no, you're not obscure - though perhaps (as suggested by brum) a winky smiley thingamijig might have assisted on this occasion.


*breathes a sigh of relief and raises a glass of uisce beatha in Declan's direction*

katie1997

katie1997

Posted
Posted

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The picture of the 1960 M.O.T. shows the

> passengers are in the back demonstrating the extra

> stress to the susspesion under special

> circumstances that might arise.

> It was thought at the time this would not happen,

> so was not added to the items to be examined.



I think you have a great memory for someone your age computedshorty. Hope the streets of ED weren't like this in the 'old days'....xx

Spartacus

Spartacus

Posted
Posted

I had a shag in the back of my car many years ago and was caught by the milkman .....



.... the next day, only because I failed to dispose of the used condom correctly and it was stuck hanging ut of the rear door (sealed end showing) for all to see....


He didn't let me live that down for years (I have since moved away from where I was living then in shame)

woofmarkthedog

woofmarkthedog

Posted
Posted

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The picture of the 1960 M.O.T. shows the

> passengers are in the back demonstrating the extra

> stress to the susspesion under special

> circumstances that might arise.

> It was thought at the time this would not happen,

> so was not added to the items to be examined.


________________________________________________________________



You are full of sh!te aren't you C.S


Ok what car make & model is that , Hm ?


Oh & that's photo is earlier than the vague old 60s BTW so it pre dates the actual MOT


Lastly it is on a rolling road but the men from the Ministry of Transport didn't wear a white lab coat


It was a Tan colour they wore .


Slipped the "old mans" mind did it, well give him a nudge



W**F

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You are full of sh!te aren't you C.S...

> Slipped the "old mans" mind did it, well give him

> a nudge



*affixes muzzle*


Now leave him/her alone...bad dog...tis just good clean fun...s/he aint doin no arm to no-one...you ear me? Now SIT!

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think we may have to have Woofie's nuts off. He

> is getting far too aggressive.


Oh Woofie just gets carried away...an excitable puppy that's all...but I have the phenobarbitol ready should the situation require it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • malumbu
      Are we now under a flight path?

      By malumbu · Posted

      Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • Forest Hill Climber
      Are we now under a flight path?

      By Forest Hill Climber · Posted

      In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • DulwichParker
      Local plumber and gas engineer - Jafar - Portrait Plumbing

      By DulwichParker · Posted

      Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • Sue Klein
      Are we now under a flight path?

      By Sue Klein · Posted

      I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...