Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh, I hope so.


I'm delighted (for Apple) that they've managed to persuade hundreds of millions of people that iPhones and iPods are 'the thing to have' but for me, computers have only ever been purchased on the basis on what I need them for, how well they work and value for money.

I hate to say it, but the iPad is not going to replace a PC to most extents.


Sure if you want it purely to browse the web, or send emails, then go for it I say.


If you want to use it for video and music, you have to synch it through a PC/MAC anyway.


If you want it for creating documents, the best you'll get are 3rd party text editors.


As has been said, its an intermediary device for playing around on the web or viewing movies on the commute, thats about it.

stevebailey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hate to say it, but the iPad is not going to

> replace a PC to most extents.


Surely.. but then it isn't meant to; no more than an iPod can replace the necessity for iTunes and a computer to sync to.


For me, the killer iPad 'deciders' will centre on whether its limited multitasking abilities will be a problem, and the nagging suspicion that iPad Mk II will feature a more regular Mac OS rather than one based on the iPhone.

*Bob*


Who cares what "they" all say & don't forget they are all poor


Unlike us, who live in bed sits with a vast hoard of cash waiting to be spent


Picture this scene....


You're naked & "working" from home, you have a seizure whilst reading a porn mag on top of the wardrobe


Your wife walks in & as you spin through the air you manage to clip the I-Pad which is laying on the bed with your foot


You hit the floor, the I-Pad lands on top of the porn mag and hides it perfectly


The wife walks out again & shuts the door


Imagine the horror of the scene if the new Macintosh device wasn't there, for that alone



I'm buying one for sure



W**F

Scientist man say big new shiny thing good for *Bob* who want watch telly and email at same time. On trains. *Bob* buy big shiny thing. MrBen need things shiny thing cannot do. He not watch telly on trains. So he no buy. He think giant i-phone is "Emperors new clothes". But *Bob* look more cool than MrBen. This not hard. Meanwhile Scientist man make lots money and hatch plans for other new shiny things to make it all better.

Actually I do take an occasional train.. and did indeed get on the morning train to London Bridge a couple of days ago.


It was full of freaks emailing on their iPhones and Blackberries, because there were clearly important emails which needed urgent attention in-between the emails they sent at home on their laptops before they set-off and the emails they'd be sending as soon as they arrived at work.

And there it is, for I am that freak. It occasionally saves me 30 mins on the day I'd otherwise spend listening to commuter snoring, talking about their house purchase falling through or watching someone read the Metro. Well that was my excuse when I bumped into Moos the other day complaining of thumb cramp....


And a contract Blackberry is a twenty quid emailing machine no? I guess I just don't have the same usage profile as that which Apple are aiming this at. On planes I'll read or watch a film on the in built E/S. Trains - as above unless its to Edinburgh where East Coast let me plug my Macbook in. So *Bob* just curious as to where / when you'd use it?

I have explained all this, Ben. BEN.. pay attention.


I already have a Mac Pro, powered by eight huge hairy testicles which does everything I need: vomits-out my irritating musical creations plus any other work-related blah, puts the kettle on, sucks me off - the lot.


I have nine year-old iBook which is dead. No iPhones or other such nonsense.


Other factors include: girlfriend (also home-based), house, stairs, garden.


Essentially we require something else to browse the web and send emails on. Whilst sitting in the garden. Whilst sitting in the kitchen. Whilst watching telly. Whilst curling one down. When the Hairy Mac is in use. Everywhere except in the same place as the one I have to spend several hours per day looking at.


Consider the iPad in relation to the alternatives.


Netbook - slightly cheaper, doesn't work very well.

Mac Laptop - twice the price, don't need the features

iPhone-type thing - pocket-sapping contract, fiddly to use, can't share it with TheMissus

PC laptop - same price, doesn't work as well, don't need the features


What would you do?

If you added up the money you would have earned per/hour working instead of trying to convince yourself to get one of these things by seeking vindication from people whose only qualification for opinion is that we have at some stage googled ?East Dulwich? does it equal the price of one?


An ipad that is.


It sounds like a high tech sanitary towel.

Aha. My apologies. I get it now. As a cost efficient add on to whatever laptop you already have for web browsing in the garden, kitchen etc. And I guess I don't do that. When I'm in the garden I like to do anything but look at the screen thats fried my brain for 5 days. And Apple screens reflect horribly in day light. The kitchen though , yes, as getting sick of the gfs greasy paws on my macbook as she makes another dish off the BBC Good Food website.


Give me time...I'll come round to it in the end.

The Apple iPad Case with Protective Wings


http://ny-image1.etsy.com/il_430xN.125922357.jpg


This is real and you can buy it here: http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=41296440



Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It sounds like a high tech sanitary towel.

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...