Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* come over mine and I'll knock you up

> scrambled eggs on toast and I won't charge ?7, in

> fact I won't charge a penny! Because three free

> range eggs mixed with butter/milk and served on

> two slices of fancy toasted bread (even the

> poshest bread in the world) doesn't take seven

> smackers out of my bank account to make! Quite

> simple.


Any idea how much those ?12 curries cost to make, Louisa?

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > *Bob* come over mine and I'll knock you up

> > scrambled eggs on toast and I won't charge ?7,

> in

> > fact I won't charge a penny! Because three free

> > range eggs mixed with butter/milk and served on

> > two slices of fancy toasted bread (even the

> > poshest bread in the world) doesn't take seven

> > smackers out of my bank account to make! Quite

> > simple.

>

> Any idea how much those ?12 curries cost to make,

> Louisa?


Those curries are entirely different. For a start they are evening meals served in a restaurant environment. This includes high quality table service. The number of ingredients and variation of base meat/fish within each batch are quite costly. Eggs on toast in an informal breakfast/lunch cafe cannot possibly be comparable. End of discussion.


Louisa.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa... I think we've already established that

> cooking is cheaper than eating out. Next.


Jeremy, don't blame me. I didn't want to talk about food (again). *Bob* seems obsessed with people spending a fortune on breakfast items and comparing eggs to champagne and cavier ingredients.


Louisa.

The cost charged includes paying staff and hiring premises. You can't possibly analyse it based on the ingredients. The ingredients are the least expensive part of most restaurant costs.


Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* are seriously comparing cooked eggs with

> chicken breast/lamb/king prawns? Honestly, I know

> you're having me on now.

>

> Louisa.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't understand why anyone would pay ?12 for a

> bog-standard 'curry' on Lordship Lane - when you

> can cook something much more interesting and nicer

> at home for a quarter of the price, but people do.

> Beats me. Seriously!


That is partly true... If you are cooking a curry for a family of 4... its cheaper... cooking for one is not always as economical.


Well being diabetic it is essential to eat regular meals every 4-5 hours..

...So having to prepare breakfast... lunch ... an afternoon snack ... and an evening meal every day gets tedious.


So I afford myself the luxuary of eating out once or twice a week.. not every night like I used to.. Hope thats ok with you..


And lots of people pay ?12.00 for a bog standard curry...(Well more like ?15 - ?18) without drinks.. ?25 - ?28+ with drinks..


Foxy

It's fine with me if you want to go out for a curry once or twice a week, but wouldn't pay for scrambled eggs.


Is it fine with you if others want to go out for scrambled eggs once or twice a week, but wouldn't pay for curry?



Do you see how neither action is somehow more valid than the other; only that different people have different ideas of what is worth paying for and what isn't?

Sue Wrote:


Why do you bother ever going out?!


You could just sit at home all day, cook every meal for yourself, and drink a pint or two in the evening

much cheaper than going out for it.


If you used paper plates and cups, you wouldn't even have to wash up :))


Apart from my daily walks and shopping I do sit at home all day.. I do Cook every meal myself..

...and I do have a beer or two in the evening.. though I don't regularly drink at home alone..


...Please don't begrudge me the luxuary of having the odd pint or two a couple of nights a week..

...I simply can no longer afford to eat and drink out every night like I once did...


...Paper plates... ??? I like porcelain.. did you not see the thread on eating off of wooden boards.. :)


... I have no problem with washing up.. it gets me up off my A*** for a while.. :)


Foxy

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Besides, three nice eggs probably costs about the

> same as one cheap frozen chicken breast (I know

> it's not the point, but stil...)



That isn't the point of course, but yes if you want to like for like compare a cheap frozen chicken breast from any named brand supermarket with three free range eggs from harrods then sure.


Louisa.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...Please don't begrudge me the luxuary of having

> the odd pint or two a couple of nights a week..


Nobody begrudges you that... not at all. But it seems that some people DO begrudge others spending ?7 (really not a lot of money) on breakfast. It all seems a bit strange.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The cost charged includes paying staff and hiring

> premises. You can't possibly analyse it based on

> the ingredients. The ingredients are the least

> expensive part of most restaurant costs.

>



LM I am well aware of overheads. I was using the food as an example of how poor *Bob* initial point was, but if we want to compare other overheads then sure. A restaurant charging 12 quid for a curry is hiring a number of kitchen and waiting staff to cook specialised food, both for eat in and eat out customers. Their overheads will be considerably higher than a cafe serving up basic breakfast items with (I am assuming) considerably fewer staff.


Louisa.

What's your point? No one has suggested that curry is overpriced. The point is comparing how much it costs to make something at home to how much a restaurant charges to prepare it for you is daft.



Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LondonMix Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The cost charged includes paying staff and

> hiring

> > premises. You can't possibly analyse it based

> on

> > the ingredients. The ingredients are the least

> > expensive part of most restaurant costs.

> >

>

>

> LM I am well aware of overheads. I was using the

> food as an example of how poor *Bob* initial point

> was, but if we want to compare other overheads

> then sure. A restaurant charging 12 quid for a

> curry is hiring a number of kitchen and waiting

> staff to cook specialised food, both for eat in

> and eat out customers. Their overheads will be

> considerably higher than a cafe serving up basic

> breakfast items with (I am assuming) considerably

> fewer staff.

>

> Louisa.

What Louisa said...


Just plain common sense and reasoning...


I just happen to know that a local Curry house is being asked ?65K per annum. and not the biggest restaurant.

and strangely enougth they too have to pay Rates, Electricity, Gas, Specialized Staff, Insurance...


So when people talk about Value for money.. It does come down to what you get for your money..


Yes.. surrounding do play a part... but having said that..

...I have in the past had some pretty decent breakfasts in some of the Greasiest of Spoons you will ever find.


Foxy.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But if you don't want to eat one thing whereas you

> do want to eat another thing and it's your money

> then none of what you are saying actually makes

> the blindest bit of difference


*Bob* you are straying from the point here entirely. Who in their right mind would spend ?7 on eggs on toast when you can make it at home, or go to a greasy spoon charging ?2 for the same thing? Your comparison of curry (in a restaurant) with eggs on toast (in a cafe) is bizarre to say the least. You simply cannot compare overheads and other costs. So your initial point is invalid.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...