Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Citizens of Dulwich, I got a penalty charge notice in the badlands of Clapham earlier even though I had a pay and display ticket....I am sure I was parked in an area non-residents could park. Anyway, after effing and blinding I saw that the muppet had typed out my registration number incorrectly. The Which website says this error makes the ticket null and void. What to do? Does anyone know if that is correct? Unfortunately, Which does not say what to do? Write to the council telling them the error or just leaving it? Was thinking of writing to Lambeth council without stating my real name nor my address, with said pay and display ticket attached. Any legal advice would be welcome.

If they have someone else's registration number on record then they won't be able to contact you. For all you know you have been given a ticket for another vehicle. Forget about it and spend the ?40 on something nice.


[edited once] Added: obviously that's not legal advice.

Just my opinion: don't do anything until you receive a formal notice through the post - the chances are the DVLC search (for the driver's details) will reveal the error at the Council's end leading to the ticket being cancelled.


If any correspondence arises - mark your letters "Without Prejudice save as to costs." and make no admissions therein.

Tony - so sorry don't know the legalities of this but I concur with the others, if its the wrong registration on the penalty charge notice then it shouldn't apply to you/your vehicle! I would simply ignore it as doubt if they can issue a charge based on this. Good luck and stay away from the badlands of Clapham :)
A number of years ago I was summoned to South Western Magistrates Court having been charged with obstruction by a Police Officer. The officer demanded my name and address, which I gave him.I attended the court and the charge was read out. The registration number on the summons was incorrect by one letter. The Magistrate asked if I had anything to say and I explained that the registration number was incorrect, I had no entitlement to drive the vehichle named on the summons, nor had I ever driven the car on the summons.He asked me for the registration of the car I was driving and asked where it was. I explained it was parked in a road near the courthouse. The case was dismissed. I asked for costs for my time and received ?6.00.

I think the consensus is to ignore it. In fact I just bumped into a traffic warden and asked him what to do. He just laughed and said forget it. Once DVLA says it's not the car they think it is, they will just bin it, even though they have a photo, which is only supporting evidence apparently.

BTW Hal9000, can you please explain to me what "Without Prejudice save as to costs" means?

Thanks all for your posts.

TonyQuinn Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BTW Hal9000, can you please explain to me what

> "Without Prejudice save as to costs" means?


I am not a lawyer: my understanding is that a letter marked "Without Prejudice" cannot be used as evidence in any subsequent court action against one. Adding "save as to costs" means that one can use the letter at the end of any such action to claim (or avoid) costs by showing that efforts were made to settle the matter before it went to court.


I think it also puts the other side on notice that the writer is a force to be reckoned with - which may persuade them not to proceed unless they have a cast-iron case.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...