Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Class wars apart, I see no reason why, if Hillsboro Road is such a log-jam, children shouldn't be encouraged to walk the length of themselves to pick-up points in rather less congested areas. If the Alleyns' parents have been organised enough to 'agree' a one-way traffic system, the arrangement of what I have just suggested should be wee buns!


I went to a very old and prestigious school in Belfast City Centre during the 1980s (Troubles still very prevalent) and every day I and hundreds of other pupils from same school walked the couple of hundred yards to the City Hall bus terminus to board a variety of different routes to different parts of the city/province. The notion that children need to be picked up directly outside their own school is quite ridiculous! If we were talking about a nursery or primary school the situation might be a little different but this 'difficulty' seems to be one of the parents' own making.

pepsi wrote:-


Are you inferring that middle class people "value and love" their children more than other people? -


1. I think you mean 'imply', not 'infer'


2. I was being ironic - I had assumed by your use of 'precious babes' that you were suggesting that Alleyn's parents were unreasonably fond and caring of their children - I used a 'reductio ad absurdum' metaphore to point this out. I assume that all reasonable parents care for their children and want to do the best by them, regardless of their social origins or aspirations.


3. I am sorry I missed the fact that your post was light-hearted, clearly however my light-hearted response was as opaque to you.

lillyanginger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are we not talking about the Infant and Junior

> School here - reception to year 6? This is the

> school with an entrance in Hillsborough...


If that is so my point is a little less valid but in a previous post I did assume we were talking about ten year olds or more and was not corrected. If we are talking about very young kids, then let the PARENTS do the walking. Park a couple of hundred yards away, walk down to school, collect your kids and take them back to the car.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pepsi wrote:-

>

> Are you inferring that middle class people "value

> and love" their children more than other people? -

>

>

> 1. I think you mean 'imply', not 'infer'

>

> 2. I was being ironic - I had assumed by your use

> of 'precious babes' that you were suggesting that

> Alleyn's parents were unreasonably fond and caring

> of their children - I used a 'reductio ad

> absurdum' metaphore to point this out. I assume

> that all reasonable parents care for their

> children and want to do the best by them,

> regardless of their social origins or

> aspirations.

>

> 3. I am sorry I missed the fact that your post was

> light-hearted, clearly however my light-hearted

> response was as opaque to you.



1. No - I meant infer. No need for English lessons from you thanks.


2. This was very unclear from your post.


3. Yes, it was.

Today's Independent:


"'Less than half of under-10s walk to school'.


Children The number of British primary school pupils walking to school has fallen to less than half, figures released yesterday indicate. The Office for National Statistics reported that in 2008 48 per cent of under-10s walked to school, a drop from the 62 per cent who walked to school in the 1989 to 1991 period. The corresponding data for the number of youngsters being driven to school jumped from 27 to 43 per cent over the same time-frame."


interesting?

I live on Hillsboro and it most definitely is not a storm in a teaup. Causes much amusement watching the manoeuvres at times unless I'm trying to get in or out of the street myself of course and then it's not funny.


I had a letter through the door several years ago regarding this voluntary one way system but as I never see any evidence of it I assumed they'd given up. Would be nice if we knew which way the direction was supposed to be.


I was told that Alleyn's have been lobbying the council for some time to get it officially one-way - nice of them to consult the residents.


There has been a few metres of double yellow lines painted recently at the ED Grove entrance to the road - obviously these are completely ignored when kids are being dropped off but things move a bit more smoothly as cars can't actually park there all day.

Yes, Asset, I do drive to take my son to school! People are perfectly entitled to use their cars to take their children to school and drive on any public road they want! What we can do, if walking or public transport isn't possible, is partake in school runs and think about where we park to help with road congestion. We have the same problem at my sons school with people parking near the gates and causing safety issues but I leave myself enough time and park a few minutes away, is this acceptable???

kangyu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was happily doing my usual school run route when

> I hit some congestion on Hillsboro Road. This is

> not unusual but on most occasions it sorts itself

> easily. However, the other day NY Escort when I

> saw the congestion, I past what I thought were

> parked cars NY Escorts dropping children of at

> Alleyn's and I pulled into a gap, I was NY Asian

> Escorts soon approached by an angry man that

> accused me of being stupid and couldn't I see that

> they were waiting. NO I couldn't, I thought you

> were parked! Anyway, it wasn't long before a woman

> joined in to say, very nicely, that the parents of

> Alleyn's have a rule that Hillsboro Road is a one

> way street that NY Asian Escort comes down from

> the opposite direction I was going in. I was

> getting fed up at this point so smiled, said it

> wasn't usually a problem and swiftly turned round

> to change my route.

> As the day went on I kept thinking how cheeky it

> was that parents of Alleyn's have decided to

> change driving restrictions on a PUBLIC road. I do

> appreciate it's difficult to find parking near any

> school for morning drop off and it's also a

> problem at my child's school but why don't you try

> parking a little further away, I DO! Many of us

> residents of nearby streets are perfectly entitled

> to use Hillsboro Road anyway we want, THANKS!



What the hell does that mean?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would imagine that the evidence shows that protein powder is not suitable for under 18s whatever the brand.  Staff should’ve known that.
    • I'm not sure it's sensible  to presume any agreement from interlocutors, but if you do, then I do agree that it's the right thing to say so. My own guess -- it's nothing more -- is that the officers were acting just to effect an arrest on arrival, as requested, quite possibly without any knowledge of the content of wretched tweet at all*, and that their being armed was absolutely incidental.  But I don't know any reliable facts. I do think the turning up (5?) en masse to do so was possibly complacent and unthinking, if there was no reason to believe the arrestee was a threat.  If they had  been doing so for good reason, I guess they could have had at least one weapon trained at him, and had  him hands above head or on the ground in no time.  But I know no reliable facts of the incident whatsoever.  Perhaps they were Father Ted fans -- seriously -- and trogged along, on a quiet afternoon, to see the man himself.  Perhaps they and/or their CO will get a severe bollocking from above.  I don't know. * But even that with some reservations.  The last time I looked up cases on wrongful arrest, years ago, I think I remember there being held then to be at least some onus on the acting arresting officer to be satisfied that  the required grounds for a lawful arrest  did exist.  And I don't know any of the facts of the present case. 
    • They carry guns at the airport.  It may not make it ok but that is a fact.  In France and America they all carry guns.
    • TfL and the Met had a small team a few years ago dedicated to addressing bike theft.  https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2011/february/officers-target-bike-thieves-and-successfully-reunite-stolen-bikes-with-their-owners I assume that went with austerity. There is now a Task Force https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/metropolitan-police-service-cycle-taskforce And some advice from the MPS: https://www.met.police.uk/cp/crime-prevention/keeping-vehicles-safe/how-safe-is-your-bike/ The marking service is good and helps.  As a cyclist you do your best to minimise the likelihood and I would never leave a high end bike locked on the street out of sight.  I've had three bikes stolen in London over the last two decades. Gum Tree sadly makes it too easy and for every bike theft there is someone knowingly or unknowingly prepared to buy a bargain that is stolen.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...