Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 + 3 = 10 (add 2 + 3 to make 5.Then times by the first number which is 2 to make 10)

7 + 2 = 63 (add 7 + 2 to make 9.Then times by the first number which is 7 to make 63)

6 + 5 = 66 (add 6 + 5 to make 11.Then times by the first number which is 6 to make 66)

8 + 4 = 96 (add 8 + 4 to make 12.Then times by the first number which is 8 to make 96)

9 + 7 = (add 9 + 7 to make 16.Then times by the first number which is 9 to make 144)

Therefore, 9 + 7 = 144

http://sciencegeekgirl.com/files/2008/09/blackboard-equations-istock_000003015755xsmall.jpg


I found it much easier to work it out like this.... http://sciencegeekgirl.com/files/2008/09/blackboard-equations-istock_000003015755xsmall.jpg


but then maths was not always my strong point


so that's 1x1image=2

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hounds Three in a group is couple and a half


And so they are! You can tell I've never been on a hunt - from Hunting Etiquette:


Hounds are counted in couples (i.e. one hound, a couple, a couple and a half, two couples, etc.). Couples are also two collars linked on a chain and can be seen hanging on the hunt staffs' saddles.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello.   Thanks Nigel and Hparker 😀   I've got new slots available for new students looking for a piano teacher or guitar teacher.   You could start in the new term beginning September, or I'm also available adhoc-styles through the summer holidays at times.   I teach all ages, in most styles, in lots of different ways according to how you learn/like to learn.   Give me a call or text on 07730 402336.   I have connections to lots of performance opportunities/networks too.   I run regular events /student concerts, and play in bands/perform.   Natalie. 
    • So do I, but I think they are in trouble as well.  Anyway, that space wouldn't be big enough.
    • I'm not talking about Starmer. I was responding to a post which  said that  Corbyn was unelectable. How people voted in the "more hotly contested election" is irrelevant. Corbyn wasn't leading the Labour Party then. Starmer was. And the turnout for Labour reflects that. 
    • Reeves says she's in charge and no no's Rayners plan, what happens now?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...