Jump to content

Dear *Bob* re: yesterdays incident


daizie

Recommended Posts

*Bob* wrote in the general section :


As reported by our very own Daizie, poster extraordinaire with a colourful history of fairytale postings for the purposes of trolling, not to mention a penchant for registering undering several different names in order to back-up her own tall tales.


Now Bob, I know we have had our disagreements in the past. But.. what sort of person do you think I am ? I would never worry decent, nice, people. Cross my heart hope to die .


You must have me down as a right nutter !


And I have never fairytale posted ANYTHING nor registered under several different names to back up tall tales . Felicity Normal if your reading ' TA VERY MUCH' .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

daizie, if the other thread is true then I'm really sorry that you had a bad experience and I hope you're ok.


But surely you can see that, even without the startling similarities between you and certain previous troublesome posters, your general attitude to the forum has always been one of contempt and negativity and so it's not wholely surprising that people are having their doubts about your sincerity now, is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HonaloochieB + Snorky = *bob*


I am genuinely unsure about dazie. She has digs at the forum, especially Sean, which are sometimes funny IMO, but sometimes a bit nasty. There are reasons to believe she has had other names, but I am not quite sure she is


Spangles30 / NatashaD / FelicityNormal, whom I am certain are the same person (well not certain, in that I have no proof, but the spidey sense always said so).


My first thought on reading dazie's thread about the flashing incident, was the same as *bob*'s, but then I reread it, and thought it did sound pretty genuine. Unlike Felicity's Lothario classic. I am therefore willing to give dazie benefit of the doubt. If, however, it is a "joke", then it's a weird one, and really not funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Felicity and Poppy thing is quite funny, someone else getting the blame for the naughtiness. Reminds me a bit of when I got into a homophobic ex boyfriends on-line dating account, changing his status to bi-sexual. I had weeks of pleasure imagining him getting matches and emails from men. It's still making me laugh. You'd have had to know him to realise how funny it was. Serves him right for being so tight.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daizie, as it happens I don't think you're NatashaD/spangles30 or poppylucky, and I'm not sure you're Felicity, although I think you probably are.


What I really don't understand, and this is a genuine question not a dig, is why you're always so negative and needlessly nasty and if you think so little of the forum and it's users, why you bother posting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Annaj wrote:- What I really don't understand, and this is a genuine question not a dig, is why you're always so negative and needlessly nasty and if you think so little of the forum and it's users, why you bother posting.



Not quite accurate Anna, Daizie positively and robustly defended TonyLS. on the queue jumping thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...