Jump to content

Man in bushes Dulwich Park this morning

muppet19

By muppet19
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

muppet19

muppet19

Posted
Posted
Did anyone else see a 20-something man with a bike on ground acting oddly amongst the bushes on the running track around outside of Dulwich Park 8.45-9.30? I ran past him three times in that time, twice doing same thing. I just thought he was a bit of a pervert until I saw the report about the attack in Avery Hill Park. There were loads of people around with the Park Run going on too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Toosmart1973 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good grief!

>

> Can a grown man not innocently 'rub one out' in

> the privacy of some foliage anymore without some

> self absorbed fitness fanatic pervertedly watching

> them??

>

> Whats the world coming to?



Maybe you should rename yourself Nottoosmart

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toosmart1973

Toosmart1973

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Toosmart1973 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Good grief!

> >

> > Can a grown man not innocently 'rub one out' in

> > the privacy of some foliage anymore without

> some

> > self absorbed fitness fanatic pervertedly

> watching

> > them??

> >

> > Whats the world coming to?

>

>

> Maybe you should rename yourself Nottoosmart



HA, ha, ha.....thats brilliant, you Mr Mick Max, are a very funny person indeed!, have you considered stand up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beej

Beej

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Toosmart1973 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Good grief!

> >

> > Can a grown man not innocently 'rub one out' in

> > the privacy of some foliage anymore without

> some

> > self absorbed fitness fanatic pervertedly

> watching

> > them??


Haha, was totally thinking the same thing lol - hadn't crossed my mind he was perverted, sounds like good old fashioned cruising to me, how old school. Best just ignored, chances are if you're not interested he won't be either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted
Sorry, I don't understand some of these comments - a man has been exposing himself (and reading between the lines a lot more than just exposing himself) in broad daylight, at a time when the park will be full of families etc, to at least two lone females and this should just be ignored or laughed off as some sort of "old school" behaviour? Seriously?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kibris

kibris

Posted
Posted
Thats the problem with this site pepole make up things who said that he was exposing himself and then was called a pervert for doing what does say anything about showing any part of his body,so grow up and stop saying things that are not facts...com
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

I'll answer you despite the fact that anyone who says "grow up" and "facts...com" doesn't really deserve a reply. muppet19 said the man was behaving oddly and later clarified this as "lewd stuff." OK, she didn't actually use the words exposing himself. Big deal. Still don't think there's anything amusing about it.


ETA What is mildly amusing, when you think about it, is that you're getting het up about the fact that a person who was behaving in enough of a sexually inappropriate manner in the park for the OP to call the police might be slandered by me making a (perfectly justifiable) assumption as to what that behaviour was. Interesting sense of priorities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnL

JohnL

Posted
Posted

Beej Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> she said "acting oddly amongst the bushes" she

> didn't actually say exposing himself. Apologies, i

> just found Toosmart1973 comment amusing.


Then below that said "Lewd Behaviour" - which is actually a definition of illegal sexual behaviour.


And we did take it as a joke back in time - the local flasher was a running joke amongst the schoolgirls at my school - but seen as progressive behaviour towards worse these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • malumbu
      Chicks and ducklings

      By malumbu · Posted

      Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • theweekend
      Food poisoning at Dugard & Daughters - twice!

      By theweekend · Posted

      I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • Sue
      Food poisoning at Dugard & Daughters - twice!

      By Sue · Posted

      If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • theweekend
      Food poisoning at Dugard & Daughters - twice!

      By theweekend · Posted

      I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...