The Lounge
The place to relax and chat about anything.
22,775 topics in this forum
-
- 4 replies
- 529 views
-
- 74 replies
- 4.5k views
-
- 2 replies
- 362 views
-
- 0 replies
- 259 views
-
- 0 replies
- 298 views
-
- 1 reply
- 984 views
-
- 2 replies
- 402 views
-
- 10 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 122 replies
- 5.7k views
-
- 22 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 6 replies
- 466 views
-
- 0 replies
- 116 views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 862 views
-
- 0 replies
- 473 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 42 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 917 views
-
- 24 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 24 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 2 replies
- 451 views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1k views
-
- 4 replies
- 691 views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.5k views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
By David Peckham · Posted
I wonder whether his political epiphany and renaissance will stretch to him using his real name - James Ashworth-McLintock - rather than the more proletarian 'McAsh'. To my mind, the only people who should have self-bestowed mononyms are very talented Brazilian footballers - Pele, Kaka, Ronaldinho - very talented female pop icons - Madonna, Shakira, Sonia - or Russian revolutionaries - Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky. Sonia's greatest hits compilation, 'Greatest Hits', is out now on vinyl & CD through PWL Recordings. -
By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted
Probably more helpful to ask simply whether McCash was affiliated with the Greens before becoming a Labour councillor. Trying to explain your thought process and unravel your fevered imagination (particularly when it comes to local politica) is the kind of thing that might require several years of psychoanalysis. -
made the mistake of going to megans twice in DV.. would never make that mistake a 3rd time. Ditto I liked Romeo Jones a lot they did lovely soups and sandwiches and coffee too and such loveley staff. -
Aren't most marxists radical by default...and he was a self proclaimed marxist on his twitter feed for years but deleted it as I suspect it did not sit well at Labour HQ. The big worry for Labour might be that he takes votes away from them (but not enough for him to win a seat) especially as there may be a significant protest vote against them at the national level as they are making such a pig's ear of things. I suspect though Labour are glad to see the back of him - to say he was a thorn in their side is an understatement and his loss of the leadership of the council was clearly part of the purge Labour has been embarking on to rid itself of some of the far-left lunatic fringe that have blighted them for so long. The Greens of course are willingly take any disaffected far-left Labour rejects in the same way Reform are hovvering up the lunatic elements of the Tories. The fact he went in with both barrels on Labour is hardly surprisingly but wonderfully hypocritical of someone who thought they were about to lead a Labour council. My how politicians flip-flop to suit their own personal agenda. How long before he falls out with the Greens...where to then? Why do I think he had an affiliation with the Greens before he became a Labour councillor? Or did I imagine that?
-