Jump to content

Pubs that welcome kids...


Recommended Posts

I reckon we're quite short of these; but myself and Bumbalina do need to meet our chums and their kids somewhere at weekends!


I make it the following ED Pubs that welcome kids:


The Herne, The Vale


Outside ED we could consider The Sun & Doves (Camberwell), The Crown & Greyhound.... erm, any more?


The ones that don't:


EDT & Black Cherry (except mid-week afternoons), The Bishop, The Palmerston, Inside 72, Liquorice, Franklins, CPT, The Drum, Uplands


Is that fair? What have I missed? It seems that 'adults only' get a reasonable crack of the whip in ED?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uplands definitely does. CPT lets kids sit outside which will be okay in summer. there seem to be 2 very annoying kids that run around in there all the time at weekends, but I suspect that's more cos their dad's a bit of a nutter :-S
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
EDT is a fine and dandy place to grab a meal with kids on a saturday lunchtime. I;ve eaten there with two smalls a few times and found it really friendly and good value, with good childrens food and nice stuff for adults too. I have to say that whenever I've been there Franklins has been a dream with kids. In fact, we celebrated our daughter's second birthday there and she tucked in heartily to the lamb's tongue.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my experience the Bishop has been great. I always take Max in there. The staff are lovely and very friendly towards him. There's always loads of babies and young children in there.


On the other hand the EDT seems to have a harsh policy. The bar staff have told me it's illegal or breaks the term of their licence to have babies in there after 7.00pm. It's embarassing when one member of a group of friends is asked to leave at 7.00pm by the bar staff to take the baby away.


Charlie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found this...


"The new Act permits children on premises provided they are supervised by someone over 18 if the young person is under 16 years of age where the main activity is the sale of alcohol (e.g. a pub). Where it isn't then they must be so accompanied after midnight and before 5am (e.g. a restaurant)."


I think though that each establishment has the right to refuse if that's what they want to do, but they shouldn't claim that it's the law when it's not.


Personally I think that 7 in the evening is pushing it a bit for kids... Fine in the day time, but surely in the evening people should be able to have a drink and get a bit rowdy, without having to worry about little kids in the place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very shocked to hear that a member of my staff told you that children are not allowed after 7pm. This is in fact not the case. In fact it is not the policy of our license to refuse an accompanied child in our establishment after 7pm and you shouldn't have been made to leave! I will address this issue immediately and I assure you it will not happen again.

My apologies for this, our policy is that Parents can decide what is right for their children. EDT proudly welcomes families of all ages.


Best Regards,


Ray@edt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we too have been warned that we will need to leave once it reaches 7. This was when sitting down outside with a very young baby - at around 5pmish - it did give the impression that we weren't really welcome there at all. Having said that, it wasn't said in an unfriendly way at all - rather as a kind of passing on of the rules (and this was about a year ago).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

funny that fatfighters, we went the other day to CHouse with two very small children in the early evening (I guess we had left by 7) and had no trouble at all. Maybe it is teenagers they don't like...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...