Jump to content

Peckham Rye Adventure Playground to Close??


stephen509

Recommended Posts

My wife was at the Adventure Playground the other day with her nephews.


She got talking with some other parents of some of the kids, and apparently the council are planning on closing the playground!


And not just this one, possibly all the other Adventure Playgrounds and Youth Clubs in Southwark!


I don?t know how true this is, has anyone else heard anything?


It would be a shame, I?ve been there a few times, its seems like a great space for the children to play. I understand its been there for years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh no. Let's hope they're not going to convert it to burial space!!! That wouldn't surprise me knowing Southwark Council,seeing they are desperate for burial space in the borough. They've already taken space from Honor Oak recreation ground and now that's full it won't be too long before they take the rest. Where would we be without our lovely green parks that positively make this area such a delight to live in.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This:

"Once the car park is moved, the new play area will be built where the current car park is. The area is bigger and the new space can include an element of water play and hopefully sand play and fit for purpose play equipment."


..sounds good. The play area in PR is a bit rubbish at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FACEBOOK wrote They've already taken space from Honor Oak recreation ground and now that's full it won't be too long before they take the rest.


I had thought that the space used for recreation was on land already designated for burials, but was being alternatively used until needed (which shows a good flexible approach).


Southwark's 'desperation' for burial space appears evidenced only in that they are using previously designated spaces for what they were previously designated for, or bringing back into use land already in cemeteries which had become neglected and over-grown (and where there were already burials).


I am happy to stand corrected, but has there been any recent (last 5 years) new designation of land for burials locally?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re the adventure playgrounds in particular - I understand that it looks likely that Southwark are planning to close all of the adventure playgrounds in the Borough - I do hope that this is not the case but if it is true Im horrified. For kids of 6 yrs plus these places are a godsend.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

stephen509 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My wife was at the Adventure Playground the other

> day with her nephews.

>

> She got talking with some other parents of some of

> the kids, and apparently the council are planning

> on closing the playground!

>

> And not just this one, possibly all the other

> Adventure Playgrounds and Youth Clubs in

> Southwark!

>

> I don?t know how true this is, has anyone else

> heard anything?

>

> It would be a shame, I?ve been there a few times,

> its seems like a great space for the children to

> play. I understand its been there for years!


Yes for over 50 years I think (I certainly remember playing there as a child in the 60's). Sadly, parkland and playgrounds are luxuries that we simply can no longer afford with our population completely spiraling out of control and the pressures on housing that has caused. I think that they should close it and redevelop it into high-rise social housing for those poor unfortunate 18-35 year old single male refugees at Calais. We really ought to do the same with the swimming baths and leisure centre and convert that for their use too as a holding centre whilst some of you on here arrange for permanent accommodation to be built for them in your gardens which the government should compulsorily purchase for a nominal sum (it's for a great cause after all). What say you judith.arkwright@hot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IVAN EDAKE Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


I think that

> they should close it and redevelop it into

> high-rise social housing for those poor

> unfortunate 18-35 year old single male refugees at

> Calais. We really ought to do the same with the

> swimming baths and leisure centre and convert that

> for their use too as a holding centre whilst some

> of you on here arrange for permanent accommodation

> to be built for them in your gardens which the

> government should compulsorily purchase for a

> nominal sum (it's for a great cause after all).

> What say you judith.arkwright@hot?



What a very unpleasant post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is under threat of closure, it would be interesting to understand how the Dog Kennel Hill Playground operates and see if there is a model there that could be made to work. If the local community were able to pull together and save a pub (Ivyhouse) then surely we could do the same to provide a great facility for our kids? I know not everyone could, but lots of folk who use it could afford to contribute - if the issue is just one of funding.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

is it certain that this playground faces closure?


Southwark's website suggests that the playground will continue and that park play activities will be enhanced.


http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/200557/peckham_and_nunhead_regeneration/3843/peckham_rye_park_and_common/2



[extract from webpage]

Updated plan:

===========

Works to the car park wasn?t part of the project, but has now been included. The updated proposal shows the new car park moved to the other side of Straker?s Road.


The new plan retains the 5-a-side football pitch in its entirety.


The playroom will be located next to the Adventure Playground building so that both facilities can use the spaces flexibly. More toilets, meeting, storage and office space can be available to all groups who use the Playroom and Adventure Playground.


Once the car park is moved, the new play area will be built where the current car park is. The area is bigger and the new space can include an element of water play and hopefully sand play and fit for purpose play equipment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mikeb - and others - does anyone know where to find a map illustrating the layout of the new facilities, especially new car park location: 'Other side of Strakers Road' sounds very imprecise. I've had a look on the Sothwark pages referring to this but couldn't find anything.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I, for one, would be prepared to lobby the councillors and do whatever possible to keep the adventure playground open. It's hugely important for the kids, particularly young teens, in the area. Renata, can you confirm what is happening? Is it closing? Being scaled back? Your feedback would be much appreciated!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

mikeb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Think this is still just a consultation document

> but may give an idea

>

> https://consultations.southwark.gov.uk/planning-an

> d-regeneration/peckham-rye/supporting_documents/25

> %20July_Event%20Boards_FINAL_Revised_30.07.2015.pd

> f

>

> the consultants may be able to help as well

> [email protected]


Thanks - that's exactly what we were looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IVAN EDAKE Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

>

>

> > What a very unpleasant post.

> I am entitled to have my own viewpoint. It is what

> is known as a democracy.


You might want to buy yourself a dictionary and see what democracy means. It certainly doesn't include an entitlement to troll a fellow poster on any unrelated thread just because she has a different view to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • 57% of those who actually lived in the consultation area I believe. Around 3,000. Presumably 2,000 of whom are the ‘supporters of One Dulwich (but not members of One Dulwich? So how does one ‘join’?) It seems fairly clear that Southwark could have done more first time round as they did open the junction back up to emergency services. I’m not sure why this suggests someone shawdowy is ‘pulling their strings’ though as you suggest. You say read up on it - why not share the evidence that emergency services were knocking on the council’s door for months and months?  You’ve just posted a claim the the LFB haven’t been consulted this time round, yet their spokesman says  “Regarding the FOI, the local authority did consult the Brigade. However, they didn’t initially contact the specific Southwark team, who responded on the FOI saying they hadn’t been contacted.” I have answered all your questions (where they are actual questions). You ducked and deflected my two for several pages, before awkwardly distancing yourself from the claims made in the missive you shared 😳 A question that says “do you agree with a design that does nothing to stop persistent number plate covering offenders” is what’s called a loaded question. Whether one say yes or no it accepts the premise. It’s the classic ‘have you stopped beating your wife” construction, and it’s not very subtle. 🙄    
    • Can someone please explain who "one Dulwich" are?
    • We are actually referred to as "Supporters"...2,100 of us across Dulwich...read and weep! 😉   https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters   Got it, the one where 64% of respondents in the consultation area said they wanted the measures "returned to their original state". Is that the one you claim had a yes/no response question?   Well I suggest you read up on it as it is an important part of the story of utter mismangement by the councils and this is why so many of us can't work out who is pulling the council's strings on this one because surely you can agree that if the emergency services were knocking on your door for months and months telling you the blocks in the roads were delayihg response times and putting lives at risk you'd do something about it? Pretty negligent not to do so don't you think - if I was a councillor it would not sit well with me?   Careful it could be a Mrs, Miss or Mx One.....   Of course you don't that's because you have strong opinions but hate being asked for detail to.back-up those opinions (especially when it doesn't serve their narrative) and exposes the flaws in your arguments! 😉  As so many of the pro-LTN lobby find to their cost the devil is always in the detail.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...