Jump to content

Brown bin collection - Council starting to charge?


Recommended Posts

I have heard a rumour that the Council plan to introduce an annual charge for the large brown organic waste bins on the basis these are used mainly for garden waste. The small brown, food waste, ones will still be free.


I was told this will be effective from 1 April but I can see nothing on council web site and don't seem to have had anything through the door. Has anyone else heard of this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was also told by a (brown bin) man from Veolia. Charge of ?60 or ?80 annually. It looks like the council is planning a number of 'surprise' (never mentioned in the community charge leaflet) charges. So the leaflet will be (in so far as it states % rises) a lie - as the actual rise for many people will be higher (but because you can choose not to have garden waste collected, I suppose treated as discretionary). That's why I started a thread on Tooley St and trust.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

tomskip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good. Hopefully people will get rid of their

> hideous large brown wheelie bins now and the

> streets and pavements will look a bit nicer.



It's the bright blue ones which are the real eyesores.


At least green and brown are colours which occur in nature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will be interesting to know if this also applies to collection of the garden waste bags? I assume it will have to, otherwise everyone will just swap to those. We don't have a brown bin but we do use the bags a few times a year. How will that be provided for?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't have a brown bin but we do use the bags a few times a year. How will that be provided for? You either pay an annual fee to have garden waste collected, or it isn't collected. As it was explained to me by the bin man. How they keep a record of who has paid is moot, of course. Indeed the management of this will cost more than they gain, particularly as they will have to provide everyone with the larger kerb side caddies - the kitchen caddy doesn't hold enough.


But this is still rumour and innuendo at this time, even if they are to start charging in April - as the householders know nothing official.


(And wouldn't, if it isn't true, of course!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Penguin68.


I'm sure that will be what they suggest - but it seems insane to charge someone who has 2-4 bags a year (mostly of leaves that blow into our front drive) the same as someone who fills a brown bin with grass and other garden stuff more regularly. Agree it will just lead to people dumping garden waste or mixing it in with other rubbish.


And edited to add, at the risk of picking an edge case to make a point - does that mean Southwark won't be collecting Christmas trees in January unless people have specifically paid for the brown bin collection? I can see that being something of an eyesore...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tomskip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good. Hopefully people will get rid of their

> hideous large brown wheelie bins now and the

> streets and pavements will look a bit nicer.


Couldn?t agree with you more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't have a brown wheelie so we use the paper sacks (plus a compost heap in our garden). I'm sure it must be possible to work out a fair way to charge people for garden waste collection. What did we used to do before the brown wheelies?


Hopefully they can recycle all the old brown bins into smaller kerbside bins which people can keep outside their kitchen doors and therefore off the pavements/front gardens. We (family of 4 adults) put out one small bag of food waste per week, so even our kerbside caddy is never full. I'm aware I'm sounding like a right smugarse here, but we need to think hard about reducing waste generally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard that, if you paid the fee, you would get a sticker for the brown bin. The paper sacks would continue but would need to be purchased.


I can see the logic in charging for what is effectively a garden waste service but there needs to be some advance communication about this and the implication thought though and explained.


Probably worth checking with local councillors, I may put something up on their thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People living in LB Lewisham have had to pay for a brown bin garden waste collection for a couple of years now. Can't remember exactly how much- ?60-70, but it is only collected for part of the year (not much call from Nov to Feb, for example).


People with low need for this service seem to: hide their garden waste in among their household waste / acquire Southwark paper garden waste bags and leave them in the street / use normal bin bags and dump it in the street / or, like our near neighbours, throw it over the fence into the alley - presumably on the basis that if THEY can't see their garden waste then it doesn't exist. Oh, and very occasionally, people load up their car and go to the tip.


Lewisham council tip is more restrictive than Southwark - no rubble, no soil, no DIY waste - so it's a wonder they still take garden clippings. Christmas trees - if you live in LB Lewisham, there is no collection from homes - you have to drag your sorry tree to the nearest municipal park where they are eventually collected. But of course, some people find it easier to just dump them in the street. And others have a bonfire with them (in their gardens, not the street, though that wouldn't surprise me either).


Bulky waste collections - ?15 for three items (quite a restrictive list) in Lewisham (fridges are ?30, mattresses free, though people still dump them in the street); ?16 for 10 items in Southwark.


When Southwark is as bad at refuse and recycling as Lewisham, you'll have my sympathy. Until then, I shall continue to dream of Southwark's waste and recycling paradise...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

slarti b Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I heard that, if you paid the fee, you would get a

> sticker for the brown bin. The paper sacks would

> continue but would need to be purchased.


Thanks - that at least seems to manage the position for people who only need to use the sacks a few times a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

peckman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My bugbear is the size of the bloody things.

> Annoyingly if you have three they are just to big

> to line up neatly on an average front garden .

> Surely they should be smaller to account for you

> are using 3 separate bins



You can ask for a smaller bin for some of them.


I have a smaller green bin than the standard size, as I don't have much landfill. Just contact the council.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are cases to be made for differential charging for different services (although as I've sent no children to be state educated maybe I should have a discount - oh, it doesn't work like that?) - what I object to is to receive a very short letter from the council making claims about the levels of charge rise - which implies some sort of like for like comparison when (and if) they plan to increase the costs to me of the services I take from them over and above that level, because I could choose not to have garden waste removed (waste which they then compost for their own use!).


That (if that's their intention) is (or would be) simply duplicitous. The trouble is that I have so little trust of Southwark that I am quite happy to believe that they will lie and obfuscate in this manner. It's what I have come to expect. I hope the rumour is wrong - (which is not to say that I wouldn't wish them to make a case and debate such a change - just that the implied manner of what they are doing would sicken me if the rumour is true). The fact that none of their elected lackeys is prepared to bell this particular cat (either through their own ignorance or policy) really says it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding asking the council for a smaller bin. Will they also take the bigger bin away?


I only have a large brown bin, so I use that for food waste. But as someone points out that does mean its only ever got one or two compostable bags of food waste in it. Not sure the collection guys like that, they often don't pick them out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Southwark Council must have committees whose soul purpose is to dream up new schemes to raise money.

Most of these are aimed at Motorists, Parking and the like.


But we are told not to Pave over our gardens to improve drainage,

Encourage the growth greenery for insects, butterflies and Bees.


Then Ban the burning of garden waste with the possibility of Fines.

Then.. If we put garden waste in our garden waste bins we will now be charged.


Good Old Labour run Southwark Council.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Because she wasn't meant to be on the ballot. Daniel Korski was their first choice but he was added to the list of Conservative politicians accused of sexual abuse and had to step down.    Interestingly that list is longer than the list of people ever convicted of voter fraud.   
    • Hi All, Just want to let know everyone that to due job cancellation I will take some more work booking for next month in June. Please contact me for more info on email: [email protected]  or on Mob 07961 403256.    Many thanks  Peter
    • Whilst I am finding this thread amusing as it is parodying the who are one dulwich discussion, at the end of the day both the pro LTN and Anti LTN groups are using social media to portray their points and arguments and it doesn't matter who is behind them as they both use simular tactics. 
    • PM has reduced from road traffic primarily due to effective emission standards, started off following the bad Los Angeles smogs of the 60s and 70s that led to petrol vehicles moving from carburetors to fuel injection, and the three way catalyst. As diesel cars became more popular, leading to more soot, as well as that already emitted from heavy vehicles new vehicle emission standards effectively brought down particulate emissions.  You always have to look at street level emissions rather than total emissions, as these have the greatest impact on human health. Car exhausts are closer to people's lungs than industrial stacks.  London all but met legal standards by the tens and Johnson, funded by DfT had a push to meet these on all roads.  Whether legal limits could be tighter is a question, as there is no such thing as a safe level.   Renewal of bus fleets and retrofitting older vehicles was important.  London as far as I am aware has the most modern/cleanest of all in the country, Livingstone wrongly supported the bendy bus, not a bad vehicle but made for wide straight boulevards.  Johnson and the new routemaster was just stupid, it vibrates, rarely running in electric mode, wasted space with the extra door and stairs, and I've seen some spewing out soot, so obviously the filter has failed.  There was a loophole that encouraged some drivers to get rid of their diesel filters after they became blocked rather than cleaning them out, but the MOT was toughened.   You still see the odd vehicle spewing out smoke, police do have powers to stop and get the owner to test, but this is not a priority.  There is a smoky vehicle government hotline but not sure if this is effective.  https://www.gov.uk/report-smoky-vehicle I've worked in and around this area for years so have some broad knowledge. I'm more active in promoting active travel nowadays.  I'd push government on driving standards which should be a quick win on safety, carbon, air quality and congestion but they are not bothered as this would mean accepting that most of us are not good drivers (subjective term but if you had a random driving retest programme most would fail). I think too much is made of ClearAirDulwich, I doubt whether they are a major lobby group but provide some good stories for people like me.  I've called Alleynes a couple of times and got them to instruct drivers to turn their engines off, it's pretty good in recent months.  There is a downside to every intervention (well apart from flouride in water but that is another story). We moved to unleaded, and some were disadvantaged, even though there were phenomenal public health benefits.  E10, reducing carbon emissions but a small number of older cars have problems.  Close a road, make it one way or introduce parking fees, as we have done for decades across London, will always upset some people. Paris in desperation during 40 degree summer temperatures with no wind introduced alternate days for vehicle access, odd and even number plates.  When this was done in Lagos the wealthy owners simply had two vehicles one with odd, one with even.  So whatever you do this will in all likelihood have a lower impact on the rich.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...