Jump to content

Report dangerous driving Audi NA66 OTC


Recommended Posts

Does anyone know if you can report dangerous driving? There was just an Audi that pulled out of Melbourne Grove onto EDG heading to Herne Hill.


A pair of jeans was thrown out of the window outside the church and then the car drove aggressively into traffic on the wrong side of the street all the way to JAGS and then sped through red lights into the distance.


I'm almost certain the car must be stolen, no-one who owned a car like that would drive it that way. Reg was NA66 OTC, Audi Q3 or 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As above - in case anyone else is wondering about this - if there is an immediate danger to people (which driving erratically on the wrong side of the road, speeding and jumping lights in this way probably counts as) I'd call 999 in case they have a car in the area and can pick them up. No other option would have the immediacy of this approach.


I did this recently where 'kids' on a motor scooter were driving along pavements, not wearing helmets and speeding through residential roads - no one suggested it wasn't an appropriate call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks - with more presence of mind next time I shall. Always difficult to react when you're at the wheel of a car yourself at the time.


Interestingly, the registration number (my passenger snapped a photo) at DVLA is not found which usually means a scrapped car, fake plate or some kind of government or undercover vehicle. Even if this were in some way official police business, the risks being taken by the driver were absolutely astonishing.


And then of course there were those jeans, almost the most perplexing element of the story..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be stolen. With fake plate report it now not to late they will then look out for it.

No one undercover would throw jeans out.

Those jeans could well have blood or dna evidence on them especially way driving.

From scene crime.

I'd bag them hand in police with reg dera type car photo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, well done, worldwiser. One of the regular topics of discussion with the police is that people in the ED area tend not to report issues, so this keeps our statistics low and therefore our police resources are low because it appears that nothing is happening down here. Plus, information can be extremely useful to officers investigating other crimes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Super Sleuth, the photo was rather zoomed in and a bit blurred so it's entirely possible. I've updated the police report to consider both.

Jeans stained with mud and paint but don't want to inspect further in case I contaminate.


Can't say the police have shown any interest so far. At what point do I stand down from my amateur detective role?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

tiddles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I reported a clear case of drug dealing from an

> Audi in east dulwich - with photo of said car and

> details of location

> Time etc - (it was about 6 weeks ago)

> Never heard a thing - nothing to do with

> protestors



What made it a clear case of drug dealing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tiddles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I reported a clear case of drug dealing from an

> Audi in east dulwich - with photo of said car and

> details of location

> Time etc - (it was about 6 weeks ago)

> Never heard a thing - nothing to do with

> protestors


If it was clear cut - could be part of a larger investigation. I don't think they'd tell you this just as if you've had money fraudulently taken from your bank account they won't tell you much about what happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they'd tell you this just as if you've had money fraudulently taken from your bank account they won't tell you much about what happened.


Current evidence is that nothing will have happened - there has been a lot of coverage recently to suggest that there is virtually no follow-up in these sort of cases. Most reports of such crimes are not even seen by actual police officers, but are 'checked' (and I use that word quite wrongly) by computer algorithms and occasionally civilian employees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think they'd tell you this just as if

> you've had money fraudulently taken from your bank

> account they won't tell you much about what

> happened.

>

> Current evidence is that nothing will have

> happened - there has been a lot of coverage

> recently to suggest that there is virtually no

> follow-up in these sort of cases. Most reports of

> such crimes are not even seen by actual police

> officers, but are 'checked' (and I use that word

> quite wrongly) by computer algorithms and

> occasionally civilian employees.


That's a pity as police should use reports such as this to built up a picture of what is happening (maybe that's what the algorithms try and do - I know nothing of Police systems). Anyway no doubt Pritti Patel is coming for them (or maybe not).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a pity as police should use reports such as this to built up a picture of what is happening


I wholly agree. This sort of crime (cyber crime and fraud) are reported to a unit in the City of London Police, who are meant to analyse them and them send them out to local forces - but of course these have virtually no fraud or cyber crime experts on them. Banks avoid response where they can and ty to place blame on their own customers to avoid liability. Famously they use 'data protection' to avoid giving details of the accounts to which funds have been siphoned. Apparently there is so much of this that police resources are overwhelmed, to the extent that they no longer really bother.


Elsewhere on this (or another) thread I have recounted the lack of police follow-up when provided with photos and car details of burglars in an incident local to me. Not enough was stolen for them to bother, as far as I can judge. If you kick someone's door in and then fail to make a suitable haul, well, we're so sorry and better luck next time, eh lads?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...