Loz

Maybe you could post a picture, perhaps, then?

As Alan said, what is she bringing to the table? No one wants to be a meal ticket. (Well, Bernie Ecclestone notwithstanding). Solvent: Is she solvent with a decent job? Does she own her own house/flat? Sanity: Creative, arty types have been known to be a little... hmmm... you know. Mad. What is her sanity rating? Single: Taken as read, given this thread. Straight: Ditto. Also, girls have been known to describe friends as 'pretty' rather easily. I've known girls to describe friends as 'pretty' when 'south side of a north-bound camel' would have been more appropriate. I suppose a photo is out of the question, but what famous person would you compare her to? (Not that I am interested - I am already taken.)

DC - what the hell made you try that? Is that your old school?

Ironically Kevin Bacon -> Philosophy = 20 clicks, via "mammary glands" and "organ". And his middle name is 'Norwood'.

david_carnell Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Do you get points for most or fewest clicks? Most, obviously. Else I bagsie 'philosophy' - 0 clicks.

That pretty much describes every accountant and actuary that I have met. I bet that's not quite what you had in mind. Why do women say this stuff, then make a beeline for the most obvious jobless, nutter bastard in the room that's trying to chat up the disinterested 17 year old barmaid? Cynical? Moi?

You're taking the piss now.

Laddy Muck Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > *googles Wikipedia for something intelligent to plagiarise, but fails miserably* You could nick this. But the irony may cause your head to explode.

Love: Vegemite on toast. Hate: Jam on toast. So wrong. It's like pineapple on pizza. Euch. Fruit = dessert.

Laddy Muck Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Well they will be coming out of my ears soon, > that's for sure. God they are good though. It's not your ears I am worried about. But it is an anagram of "ears", though. ::o

A third of a bucket of strawberries? My, aren't you going to be... um... regular.

Sainsburys sell 'em.

What do you call a woman with two c***s? N-Dubz

It's called "Sky Remote Record" and, as peckahmboy said, have a look at the sky website.

"Vast majority" is over-egging it somewhat. Let's do something weird and instead of grabbing wild, unrelated figures off YouTube videos, we'll introduce some actual survey results. The latest YouGov from last week says: Thinking about the way the government is cutting spending to reduce the government's deficit: Good or bad for the economy? Good: 38% Bad: 47% Don't Know: 15% Being done fairly or unfairly? Fair: 30 Unfair: 58 Don't Know: 12 Necessary or Unnecessary? Necessary: 59% Unnecessary: 31% Don't Know: 10% Too deep, too shallow or at about the right level? Too deep: 47% Too shallow: 7% About Right: 31% Don't Know: 15% Being done too quickly, too slowly, or at about the right pace? Too Quickly: 53% Too Slowly: 7% About Right: 30% Don't know: 10% And who do you think is most to blame for the current spending cuts? Coalition: 26% Labour: 41% Both: 23% Neither: 6% Don't Know: 5% So... no 'vast majority' there. In essence, yes, a small majority think they are too deep, too fast and unfair. Bizarrely, people think the cuts are necessary, but somehow also bad for the economy (one wonders what they think are needed for, then). But it's all Labour's fault, anyway. People are strange.

"Totally Anonymous Soccer Player Sues Twitter For Saying Ryan Giggs Had An Affair"

If it's not a silly question, why didn't you call them at the time?

I must mumble when I type. Or something.

You get fit in a matter of days. And if not, there's a good A&E close by for when the body gives in.

binary_star Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Haha, I read the above as: "Are you a male cyclist > wearing a blue top hat" If he was - and he keeps up the way he cycles - it will end up being a flat cap...

I assume that you enjoy some of the other services - schools, aged care, council housing, planning, roads, parking, etc, etc that the council provides. I'd rather the benefits you enjoy aren't added to my council tax bill. But that's not how it works. Prey tell why - on your own assessment of the system - my council taxes should pay for the pavements near your mother's house. I mean shouldn't you be out there sorting them out yourself? Or do you apply a different criteria for yourself? As I said on the other thread - I pay my council tax and do not begrudge it, but I don't get (nor expect) a lot back in return compared to many others. This was the one time in 10 years. And you begrudge it. In fact you seem to be saying, "Sod everyone else. Spend council money on me, me, ME!" Your really are coming across as the Grinch. And I really hope you are the first recipient of the ?250 bill.

thomastillingthe3rd Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If you think that your seeming grasp of sentence > structure leads people to believe that you are > endowed with some kind of intelligence, then you > are sadly mistaken? It just shows your potential > to be a narrow minded snob of sorts, are you from > the village ward? > > To talk about how the president swept into town > and discussed the marvel of 16%, at a time when > the vast majority of the country are seething > about Nick Clegg, and disgusted with the moral > u-turns the liberals have taken to gain some > power, is frankly, utterly delusional. > > Well, your sentence structure may have improved (did mummy help you?) and you have lost the silly text-speak, but unfortunately your reading needs work. I didn't talk about "how the president swept into town and discussed the marvel of 16%".

Don't know if he'll read this, but... Are you a male cyclist wearing a blue top that cycled down Dog Kennel Hill, into Edgar Kail Way and into Sainsbury's at about 4.30pm today? You might want to know that cycling past the moving cars on their left in Edgar Kail Way, throwing your right arm out the millimetre you get your nose past them and swinging straight across the middle of the mini-roundabout is not a great idea. You probably don't know this (as you didn't look) but you missed collecting my bonnet by not very much. Not everyone takes that turn into Sainsburys - I normally don't but you were lucky that today was one of the few times I did. Even then it was a very *close* call. If you do want to keep pulling this move, I suggest you keep your affairs in order - you probably are not going to be around for long.

Says it all... http://www.spectator.co.uk/article_images/articledir_13927/6963883/1_fullsize.png

TT3 - you are barely able to string a reasonable sentence together. I fear we may have to wait a few years for a reasonable argument from you. Probably until you finish school.