Sue

I have combined buildings and contents insurance, just come up for renewal and I have a fortnight to change (or not). I have always thought that in 1996 and 2001 I had subsidence claims, therefore when looking for another quote I have always said so (and generally therefore been refused cover). My insurance company was also involved with another issue in 2009 which was potentially subsidence, however the claim was declined although they paid an arm and a leg for a brief visit by a surveyor. I had a telephone conversation with my current insurer last year during which I was told that there were four categories of movement - subsidence/heave/landslip/ground movement and that both my claims (plus the one declined) had been categorised as "ground movement" rather than "subsidence". Now this seems odd to me. The first one was cracking due to differential movement between the front bay and the rest of the house, due to different levels of foundation or something, and subsequently some sort of rod was put through the bay, and the second one was cracking due to leaking drains (or something to do with drains anyway), which was dealt with by dealing with the drains. The person I spoke to last year said that it would depend on the underwriter whether the ground movement was classified as subsidence or not, but surely either it is or it isn't? My problem now is, if I go online to get quotes, I will (probably) be asked if I have ever had subsidence or been refused insurance. So in the first case, can I now answer "no"??? And in the second case, if I answer "yes" the thing will go no further, but if I answer "no" on the basis that I was refused it because I unwittingly gave wrong information, would I be lying? Also - I'm in a three bed terrace in SE22 and my renewal quote for combined buildings and contents insurance is ?732 with ?1000 excess for "subsidence, heave or landslip". Does that sound reasonable? Because if so, I'm not sure I can be bothered faffing about getting other quotes :) Though if I did I might be able to get my existing premium lowered (as I did with my car insurance last year) whilst staying with the same insurer.

the-e-dealer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Its android viruses not so prevalent. I think its > a memory leak bit of the phone message buffer > leaking in to the drafts buffer. xxxxxx Blimey :)) Can I expect these weird texts to continue then? Let's hope I don't press "send" by mistake or some recipients may be in for a shock :))

El Pibe Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Paranormal activity would be the obvious > explanation. xxxxxx Hmmm, I carefully didn't refer to it as a "phantom" text to deter that kind of comment :)

Bluerevolution Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Have you downloaded an anti-virus app ? I use AVG, > very good and FREE xxxxxxx No, didn't even know I needed an anti-virus app on a phone! Didn't know they could get viruses! Will try AVG, had it on my laptop at one time but it ended up causing problems with another programme, can't remember what now.

the-e-dealer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > what phone is it? xxxxxx Orange San Diego. Just under two years old, so coming up for an upgrade soon.

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > another possibility > > the voice recognition was switched on in a room > with other people/radio/tv and tried to make sense > of what it heard xxxxxx I can assure you I have been nowhere where "call of duty" may have been mentioned, and in any case I was asleep in another room :))

:(

It said "All of music so tonight why that's so raven call of duty yes send to play not not certain the book of a plane" :)) :)) :)) And no I couldn't have typed it myself in some trance or something, as it appeared whilst the mobile was in my office charging overnight..... the "music" and "raven" (used to be a band, changed their name) could have been in texts I sent, but deffo not "call of duty" :))

Just spoken to Orange who basically said nobody would bother to hack into my phone :)) :)) :)) And that it must be "an anomaly". And just to delete the draft text. Oh, that's alright then. :(

Somebody/something, ie not me, has drafted a text on a message thread on my mobile. This is a bit disconcerting to say the least. It doesn't make sense, but has words and phrases in which could have been picked up from texts I've sent in the past. Am trying to contact Orange (soon to be RIP) but they're "receiving a very high number of calls, blah blah blah". Can anybody shed any light? I'm worried somebody could be somehow making calls from my number as well, even though I have the phone in front of me ..... :( Is this a more widespread problem?

first mate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- In this instance the > dog had been left in a derelict room, in boiling > heat, without food or water. It took two days of > constant calls to the RSPCA for them to decide to > intervene. xxxxx Exactly.

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So many pubs in there that I've drunk in - then > next visit they've gone. xxxxxx Some pattern forming there?! :))

chickenteeka Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > They said unless i knew the whereabouts of the dog > or the dog was in harm they weren't able to do > anything. xxxxxxx Did they say what they would do if you did know the whereabouts of the dog?

chickenteeka Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > i have just called the RSPCA the poor dog is still > howling xxxxxx What did the RSPCA say?

Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Just looking at sold prices and found this > particular piece of madness... > > 36 St Francis Road, London, Greater London SE22 > 8DE > ?650,000 Terraced, Freehold 17 Jan 2014 > ?420,000 Terraced, Freehold 09 Oct 2013 > > ?230k profit in three months! xxxxxx Bloody hell - but presumably it was "improved" in the intervening period?

rspcalondonsoutheast Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > The RSPCA is available 24/7 to report cruelty or > neglect. Please feel free to call 0300 1234 999. > All calls to the RSPCA are recorded. xxxxxx So if somebody phones to report an apparently distressed howling dog, what action is the RSPCA supposed to take, please? Because my experience was as I have posted above :( It was a year or so back - does the RSPCA now have more resources?

When I phoned the RSPCA about an apparently very distressed howling dog left outside during a thunderstorm, they were not in the least interested and told me to phone the council. Who weren't interested either, if memory serves :(

Hey, well done the people who rescued the bees :)

:)

Vik Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I presume the crying out loud was the fact that > people seemed to be acting like it was some huge > state secret. xxxxxx I thought it was amusing that people were wanting it to be somebody "famous" .....

Could you post a link to the proposed changes please, or give us more detail as to what they are? Ta! ETA: Ignore this, I see there is already a thread about it (so not sure why another one has been started?) http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1302472

worldwiser Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > An extremely helpful and apologetic letter from > the owner's architects was put through our door > today. All is explained with contact details > should there be further disruption. Anyone who > didn't receive a copy let me know and I'll scan > it. xxxxx This is pure nosiness as I don't live on Crawthew Grove (though I walk down it often) but could you give us a brief description of the explanation? Were there apologies for the giant multi-loo parked in the road for weeks? Is it coming back?!

speedbird Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Jeremy Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > JimH, I think it's common knowledge, apparently > he > > was quite open about it on Twitter... > > > Who is it then? Someone famous? Pray tell... xxxxxxx Depends how you define famous :)

katesonic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- But hey do any of you know where the Nags > Head is or have tasted the best Sunday roasts in > South London in The White Horse? xxxxxxx "Best Sunday roasts in South London in The White Horse"? Eh? They're certainly cheaper than most others round here, so you could make a case that they were "best value Sunday roasts", maybe, but "best"? Not the Sunday I was there :(

I've PMed you, Louisa.