Sue

The "new" Moo Too?

Thanks James, my claws are now back in :)

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Meanwhile, paint continued to dry on a wet wall > somewhere in the world. > xxxxxxx Well, you appear to be happy to watch it dry, and to post about it :))

:)) :)) :)) It's quite easy. James's post at 1.50pm on 5 March is still saying that the Co-Op has applied to sell alcohol 24/7. But do feel free to do the frying pan thing. Can we come and watch? ETA: The reason I'm continuing in this way - which is obviously very irritating to everybody else - is that there is still misinformation on the thread, and whilst the apology is welcome, it hasn't actually altered that fact.

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Sue, > Today I've corrected the opening post and > apologised. I've PM'd everyone who had posted > anything apologising and correcting what the > application is for. > > What you've posted above is not what the opening > thread now says. > > Please tell me how I can be clearer and correct > the wrong start? > > NB. The Coop is still seeking to open close to > 24/7. Openin gat 6am and closing 5am the following > day. xxxxxxxx The post which needed to be edited was not your original post, which you've changed. The post which needed to be edited was the one you posted at 1.50pm on 5 March, which I have quoted above. That was the one which caused all the confusion, not your original post. The confusion was caused because of the part I have put in bold above, which was wrong. That wrong information is still being shown on this thread, and it was clear previously that people were reading that post without reading the rest of the thread, and hence continuing the confusion. I hope that's clear? Sorry, but it was that post which was the problem all along, and it's still there.

Franklins do a veggie breakfast variant, or did do.

the-e-dealer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Credit where credits due James has apologised - > too infrequent for politicians! xxxxxxx But his post giving the wrong information is still there??!!??!! He hasn't corrected it at all??!!??!! Re: Lordship lane Co-op wants to open 24/7 Posted by James Barber March 05, 01:50PM Hi worldwiser, The Co op have appleid to extend existing licence from 6am-10pm to 5am-11pm and applied for a second licence to sell alcohol 11pm to 5am. Effectively they can sell 24hours. Any review of licences could include cnditions around deliveries. So if I were you I'd contact the licensing officers and state that deliveries are an issues and ask for conditions aorund times of deliveries. I've not been able to track down any planning conditions about times of opening or deliveries. I've asked officers if they have any recorded. hope this helps. Regards james.

Erm, I think Jeremy was joking :))

This is so disappointing - I have been reading a book about London folklore, which is mainly about ghosts (or rather, stories of supposed ghosts) and when I saw the thread title I thought it was the hearse itself which was a phantom hearse :))

Are there really going to be enough ice cream eaters for ED to support TWO ice cream shops? Not forgetting Hope and Greenwood's very yummy and excellent value ice cream?! What will happen to ScoopED?

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Sue, > I didn't spot your comment before now and it's > late. So I'll check it out tomorrow and come back > to you. xxxxxxx So what is the result of your checking out? Has the Co-Op applied to sell alcohol 24 hours or not? The evidence - including the attachment to your own original post on this thread! - suggests not, in which case should you not be correcting your subsequent post on this thread before your misinformation becomes even more entrenched in people's minds?

traveller1 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I will no longer go to Le C either as was turned > away with my aunt and two girls (8 and 10) because > the only seats were near the front of the cafe. As > there are lots of other choices around East > Dulwich, I see no point in going back. xxxxxxx But 8 and 10 is quite old, surely - children that age are unlikely to disturb others? Do they not like children around at all then, or not where they can be seen from the street? Where do they draw the line?

I posted this somewhere else on the forum at the time, but a few weeks back a complete stranger stopped to help put a large dresser into a car it barely fitted into. If he hadn't supervised I'm not sure we would have ever succeeded in getting it in ...... Really kind.

Re: Lordship lane Co-op wants to open 24/7 Posted by James Barber March 05, 01:50PM Hi worldwiser, The Co op have appleid to extend existing licence from 6am-10pm to 5am-11pm and applied for a second licence to sell alcohol 11pm to 5am. Effectively they can sell 24hours. xxxxxxx The part in bold is incorrect so far as I can see, as the second part was for refreshments, which do not cover alcohol. So basically, James posted correct information in his original post on this thread, but has subsequently muddied the water with incorrect information, which other people have now picked up on and are repeating the inaccuracy that the Co-Op are wanting to sell alcohol 24 hours, rather than just wanting to be open 24 hours. With a tiny extension of an hour for alcohol sales in the morning. So perhaps the person accusing me of accusing James Barber wrongly could apologise :)) :)) :)) Unless I turn out to be wrong, in which case I shall grovel :)) :)) :))

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue Wrote: > > > > > THE CO-OP HAS NOT APPLIED FOR A 24 HOUR > LICENCE > > TO SELL ALCOHOL!!!!! > > > > And why James Barber has not come onto this > thread > > to correct this misinformation he is putting > > about, I have no idea. > > > > But unless he has a very good excuse, my > opinion > > of him has plumeted. > > Perhaps you can clarify where you feel misinformed > before your opinion further plumetes? xxxxxx Yes. James Barber said earlier something like "Effectively they can sell alcohol 24 hours". I think it is on the second page. I will find and copy and paste the post, but I have a laptop problem at the moment.

Many licensed venues have rooms where "children" can have parties. Try The Old Nun's Head and The Crown and Greyhound, to name just two! Don't know whether you'd consider them "cool", though!

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Now Burma is a virtual Dictatorship. xxxxxxx A lot of things are changing in Burma recently.

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- Since then I've heard about bombs / > artillery to flush-out seperatists who were hiding > there, resulting in significant damage to the > pagodas. > Gutted to hear that. xxxxxx Oh bloody hell. Mind you, there are/were so many pagodas there, surely they can't have damaged that many of them? That's terrible, though.

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I am a vocal supporter of working class culture > and come from a working class background. For > once, this isn't about that. There is an Iceland > store within walking distance in Peckham, xxxxxxx It's within walking distance if you don't mind a half hour walk there and a half hour walk back, which is about what it would be for me. Compared to a two minute walk for me to the Lordship Lane branch (which btw has six large free-range eggs for a pound. Bargain.)

fredricketts Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Make Mr Barber Right. > > > I would like to object to the granting of a 24 > hour licence to the co-op at Lordship Lane SE22 > for the following reasons: > > 1. We already have too many outlets for 24 hour > Intoxicating liquor licensing in Lordship Lane. > xxxxxx Please read the whole thread. THE CO-OP HAS NOT APPLIED FOR A 24 HOUR LICENCE TO SELL ALCOHOL!!!!! And why James Barber has not come onto this thread to correct this misinformation he is putting about, I have no idea. But unless he has a very good excuse, my opinion of him has plumeted.

"Late night refreshment" is stuff like tea and coffee.

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- any restrictions > when you're in Pagan (or what's left of it, by > now). xxxxxxx God, what have they done to Pagan? I was there twenty years ago (yes I know but I wasn't very politically aware at the time) - it was one of the most magical (man-made) places I've ever been.

That's a brilliant picture! :)) :)) :))

I think we're finally sorted now, touch wood. Thanks to everybody who offered help.

Goose Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Correct me if I am wrong ... but the main point of > this is the application for a 24 hour alcohol > licence. xxxxxx Yes you are wrong. The application is NOT for a 24 hour alcohol licence. And now this rumour has been started, people will be opposing the application on completely false grounds. Forgive me for being cynical, but was that the intention of posting false information on here? ETA: I don't mean you, Goose. ETA: James Barber, I think you should post on here apologising for giving incorrect information and making absolutely clear - again, since it seems some people have not read the whole thread or looked at your attached pdf - what the Co-Op's application actually says. If you don't do that, then I - and I expect others - will draw our own conclusions.