Narnia

Why didn't you place that in the context of what followed? Believe what you like.

True........if that's what I said!

You have misunderstood me ????. I have not intentionally or otherwise insulted Sean.

I imagine that I could probably insult you more than you have me, but there is no point.

Well try reading between the lines and it wont sound so paranoid. ???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Declan Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I haven't read all of this thread but enough to > > get the gist that Hal is upsetting Sean who has > > stated he should retire like Piers. Meanwhile > Hal > > was warned not to upset anyone else (ie a > > moderator) or the forum would be shut down. > Thus > > if Sean in his role, which I'm not sure I can > > mention out loud, were to retire from it, then > it > > would be HAL's fault and the end of the forum > > would be nigh.As my post about moderators was > > moved to the 'about the forum' section which > > nobody ever looks at, should I conclude that > there > > is some conspiracy happening here about which I > > know very little but which appears to have on > one > > side HAL as the victim and two others as the > > aggressors? Or have I got that all wrong? Help! > > that's one of the most paranoid posts i've ever > read

Sean, I really don't know where you are coming from. Happy about what? I haven't exposed a moderator to the masses as none confide in me. So who am I supposed to accord respect to? I doubt HAL cares if he is in trouble but you suggest that I am. What sort of trouble am I in? It seems to me you are worn out and you need a rest. I don't mean that patronisingly but simply because I've seen the odd post of yours here and there and you just seem pi**ed off. That's a shame if it's true.

I haven't read all of this thread but enough to get the gist that Hal is upsetting Sean who has stated he should retire like Piers. Meanwhile Hal was warned not to upset anyone else (ie a moderator) or the forum would be shut down. Thus if Sean in his role, which I'm not sure I can mention out loud, were to retire from it, then it would be HAL's fault and the end of the forum would be nigh.As my post about moderators was moved to the 'about the forum' section which nobody ever looks at, should I conclude that there is some conspiracy happening here about which I know very little but which appears to have on one side HAL as the victim and two others as the aggressors? Or have I got that all wrong? Help!

Why does one have to be a nudist to do this? Daizie, what makes you think it makes them warmer?

Deleted as per above post

Why did you move this Admin? It could have been a fun discussion.

Actually United played well up until Everton equalised which admittedly was shortly after we scored. After that it could have gone either way but Rooney was not on top form and Berbie was as lazy as usual.Those who argued my point that Rooney's touch is not great should watch this game closely. He blew it on two occasions when it mattered. Great player but not all things to all men.

Ladymuck.......our Mrs Bridges was in fact a Mrs Jenkins affectionately known as Bridges. She had fine boobs if thats what you mean by handsome. She was excellent at clearing up vomit in our bedrooms during our teenage years and managed not to inform on us.

What.....yogurt splatters everywhere?

Deleted due to it upsetting people

Dear Admin, who is Mrs Z? Declan

Dear Mrs Z your PM was not required. If you choose to answer my questions I would at least like them to be published albeit not in my name of course. What are the options? I see you have already started a 'problem' thread and I suspect you did this because I gave you the idea. Either give advice or tell me who you are. Richard

Dear Mrs.Z do you have a problem page I could write to? You sound like the sort of person I could confide in with all my problems about world peace and the decline in the ant population. I don't really want to go public on my issues though hence the question. Richard

I'm glad the golf writers boycotted his speech today. What was the point if questions couldn't be asked? He may as well have posted the script on his web site. Asked what he thought sex therapy was one American journalist on the radio today reckoned it must be a case of being weaned off 4 blondes a week, down to three etc until he just needs one! No wonder he's gone back in for more therapy.

Either way would it be good for Scottish football to fully intergrate into the English Football League? Not feasable because of distance/cost reasons though there probably plenty of other reasons too. Torquay v Inverness C, not affordable. I don't think it will be too long before the lower divisions here are regionalised anyway, like they used to be.

....a myriad perhaps? Or is it a myraid?

REACTIONS TO TERRORIST THREATS The English are feeling the pinch in relation to recent terrorist threats and have raised their security level from "Miffed" to "Peeved." Soon, though, security levels may be raised yet again to "Irritated" or even "A Bit Cross." The English have not been "A Bit Cross" since the blitz in 1940 when tea supplies all but ran out. Terrorists have been re-categorized from "Tiresome" to a "Bloody Nuisance." The last time the British issued a "Bloody Nuisance" warning level was during the great fire of 1666. The Scots raised their threat level from "Pissed Off" to "Let's get the Bastards" They don't have any other levels. This is the reason they have been used on the frontline in the British army for the last 300 years. The French government announced yesterday that it has raised its terror alert level from "Run" to "Hide". The only two higher levels in France are "Collaborate" and "Surrender." The rise was precipitated by a recent fire that destroyed France 's white flag factory, effectively paralysing the country's military capability. It's not only the French who are on a heightened level of alert. Italy has increased the alert level from "Shout loudly and excitedly" to "Elaborate Military Posturing." Two more levels remain: "Ineffective Combat Operations" and "Change Sides." The Germans also increased their alert state from "Disdainful Arrogance" to "Dress in Uniform and Sing Marching Songs." They also have two higher levels: "Invade a Neighbour" and "Lose". Belgians, on the other hand, are all on holiday as usual, and the only threat they are worried about is NATO pulling out of Brussels . The Spanish are all excited to see their new submarines ready to deploy. These beautifully designed subs have glass bottoms so the new Spanish navy can get a really good look at the old Spanish navy. Americans meanwhile are carrying out pre-emptive strikes, on all of their allies, just in case. New Zealand has also raised its security levels - from "baaa" to "BAAAA!". Due to continuing defense cutbacks (the airforce being a squadron of spotty teenagers flying paper aeroplanes and the navy some toy boats in the Prime Minister's bath), New Zealand only has one more level of escalation, which is "Shit, I hope Australia will come end rescue us". In the event of invasion, New Zealanders will be asked to gather together in a strategic defensive position called "Bondi". Australia , meanwhile, has raised its security level from "No worries" to "She'll be all right, mate". Three more escalation levels remain, "Crikey!', "I think we'll need to cancel the barbie this weekend" and "The barbie is cancelled". So far no situation has ever warranted use of the final escalation level

Talking of the end - The Incredible String Band

Ladymuck, I am indeed surprised you don't know who Mrs Bridges is/was! Upstairs.........??????? is a clue! I thought you would have one yourself.

Smooth Operator - Sade

What's this thread about?