edcam

Yup - on Camberwell Grove

Hats off to HB for the apology. Moral of story - don't post crap in the first place.

Just sell it and if anyone asks say you lost it. They might buy you a replacement which you could then sell and make even more ????????s!

I don't think it's particularly tight not to want: "lots of minature bottles of drink, some full some empty open to offers."!!!

*Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > edcam Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > dbboy Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > But at least he's fallen on his sword (excuse > > the > > > pun!!) > > > What?! This either makes no sense or is > offensive > > and I can't quite be sure which... > > Well - you know! He's GAY, isn't he?! So basically > it's just gotta be about cock, cock, cock all day > long, like all homosexuals - right? Right. Astonishing isn't it?!

dbboy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > But at least he's fallen on his sword (excuse the > pun!!) What?! This either makes no sense or is offensive and I can't quite be sure which...

As much as you might not like it, the car park is their property and you're not automatically entitled to park there.

Quite pk. Parking tickets are a nightmare and parking wardens are often very unpleasant BUT I am always slightly dismayed when people come on to the forum and moan about getting a ticket when they have parked outside of restrictions. I feel for the OP's parents but these days it's a bit daft to park anywhere unless you're absolutely sure you're not risking a ticket.

cate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > HonaloochieB Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > cate Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > What you are referring is not a click. It's > a > > > clique. > > > > Away with your Frenchified flummery. > > 'Clique' indeed Cate. > > It saddens me to see someone falling at the > first > > hurdle, particularly as the response has, in > the > > first stages been a little less than > overwhelming, > > but standards must been maintained. > > We must always aim for quality rather than > > quantity. > > Regretfully I must decline your application. > > > > The board finds you not 'street' enough for > this > > particular click. > > > > With your permission we will submit your > details > > to the West Dulwich Forum, but even then... > > > Thanks for the rejection. You are just a bit > previous. I didn't apply to join. Cate - I think you might be well out of this one. Nothing wrong with expecting a level of literacy!

Kylie/Danni.

mightyroar Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Pimp my babyride? > This is the second branch after the Clapham one > did so well It will be a HUGE hit.

A friend who is an actors' agent and was dealing with a Dutch advertising agency when one of her clients shot a commercial. The guy at the agency was called Randi Bugge.

A customising workshop for Bugaboos.

Good grief - leave the poor woman alone. I expect she's regretting starting this thread. Penguin68 - you sound like you need to let your hair down once in a while!

Blimey you're a critical and unhelpful bunch. Either do the survey or ignore it.

ImpetuousVrouw Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I beg to differ, it was the dogs bollox. Remove the words "the dogs" and you're getting there!

I imagine the LibDems are delighted people like this aren't supporters!

Dignified response there from James Barber I notice the OP hasn't returned to the thread to apologise for the slur.

He's a sexy man but blimey, Luther was APPALLING! Some good actors being terrible, lousy dialogue, awful direction and editing. One of the worst dramas there's been on TV for a while.

A second hand Bugaboo emporium.

KD Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > So go ahead have your little tent on goose green > on fair day, and look down your noises at the real > people of East Dulwich, the real people of East > Dulwich don?t think much of you. > > I don't believe I've ever looked down my "noise" (sic) at anyone!

ruffers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KD Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > edcam Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > This is the most amusing thread since Colin > the > > > Catflap Fitter! Is this person real? How on > > > earth does he expect us to support him when > he > > > hasn't furnished us with all the facts. A > > > councillor would be insane to enter into > > > correspondence with someone making serious > > > allegations (if only you would tell us > exactly > > > what these allegations are.) You would make > > much > > > more headway if you seemed a little more > > > "grounded". > > > > > > ======================================= > > > > I?m not looking for your support, I was just > > voicing an opinion ? as yet we are not under a > > Lib-Dem government, so free speech is still a > > valid part of our democracy, I know you would > > probably like to silence anyone that does not > > think the same as you, and when you establish > your > > own Politb?ro, you can indulge your desires. > > > > KD > > Your best post yet, keep it up! It is, isn't it? If this person isn't looking for support, why this thread, and why the weird website. Anyroad, he's provided a fair bit of entertainment, so I'm not complaining!

It's a tricky subject. I don't blame James Barber for not wanting to interfere in another ward over such a sensitive issue. There is something very depressing about dead flowers and soggy teddy bears. However, I have to say that both as a driver and as a pesestrian, when I see thse memorials it does act as a reminder about safety. If it helps to prevent further accidents, then it can't be a bad thing. That said, there should really be a time limit, perhaps a month after the accident?

This is the most amusing thread since Colin the Catflap Fitter! Is this person real? How on earth does he expect us to support him when he hasn't furnished us with all the facts. A councillor would be insane to enter into correspondence with someone making serious allegations (if only you would tell us exactly what these allegations are.) You would make much more headway if you seemed a little more "grounded".

Seriously though - if you don't feel that there's anyone you wnat to vote for, you should spoil your paper as this gets counted. Much more worthwhile than not bothering to turn up.