Jump to content

Earl Aelfheah

Member
  • Posts

    8,215
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Earl Aelfheah

  1. The BBRR should so be bought back.
  2. If they do bring in a CPZ perhaps we could encourage something like this: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/17/sun-terraces-and-lawns-dutch-residents-transform-parking-spaces
  3. Apparently I joined on 26/09/2007. Over 5,000 posts. I'm wasting my life.
  4. There are chains which could work there, but not a PE.
  5. It could work as a pub /restaurant, but it would be more profitable as housing. A cynic might suggest that this is why there has been a fire followed by a long period of dereliction.
  6. I can't believe that Pizza Express would do well in that location. There are so many better pizza joints nearby (and also a PE in the Village).
  7. Robert Poste's Child Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I do Nordic walking and almost every time I'm out at > least one loose dog will run up barking Not unless Rupert has seen it. If he hasn't seen it, it hasn't happened.
  8. rupert james Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Walking my dog twice a day in the park on weekdays > come rain or shine I cannot remember seeing any of > what you state happening. Oh well, it can't of happened then.
  9. ... and when you say a lorry, I think you actually mean a truck, if you look at the definition....
  10. The accusation of homophobia, is ridiculous. Describing the two men as being a couple is simply that, a description. also, it seems to massively miss the point, which is that the OP's wife was verbally abused in the park, which is a pretty horrible experience. This forum is getting beyond parody. To also pick on the choice of wording used and argue over the definition of 'assault' - I mean, come on people. If someone said they were run over by a lorry, driven by a white man, with red hair, would you offer support, or argue that a lorry can't run and that the drivers ethnicity is irrelevant.
  11. I've had a couple of picnics in the park interrupted by dogs stealing food and / or knocking everything over. I've also had dogs jumping up and barking at me as I jog. The truth is that there are a lot of people who have their dogs off the lead and out of control (not a majority, but still a lot) and it's pretty unreasonable. It's a shame that people aren't all considerate and responsible, but they're not and it should be possible for others to go out their 'park business' unharassed.
  12. RadLuke Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > NO - the free parking is one of the most > convenient things about living aroundhere and it > is never impossible to find a space, even if > sometimes you do have a little walk. ^this
  13. Thank you James for all your hard work. I am really gutted that you didn?t get voted back in. All the best.
  14. singalto Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I find the parking across two spaces very annoying > too but marking them out can achieve the same > result: I have a small car which is currently > parked in front of an enormous car which is > practically twice its size. I regularly see two small cars taking up enough space for three big vehicles. There is always going to be some underutilisation of space, but by marking out regular spaces, I think over all you would see an increase in capacity across an entire street.
  15. I'm not suggesting meters, or any enforcement. Just that by marking out spaces, you encourage people to park tighter together. That's why I said 'nudge'. My road regularly has cars almost an extra car length apart from one another. If you marked spaces, I believe you would reduce the number of people doing this. Could always pilot it on one street and see what impact it has on behaviour.
  16. How about marking car distances, to encourage people not to park with 3/4 of a car length between them and the nearest vehicle. A bit of a 'nudge' to use the available space more efficiently. I reckon you could get several more cars on every street in Dulwich by doing just this.
  17. By 'regulating the service', don't they just mean 'slowing every bus to the worst on the route'.
  18. Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The BBC has waived any license fee requirement for > public showing of the wedding - mainly for street > parties of which a surprisingly large number have > been declared in Bromley. I'm not that surprised. True blue in Bromley.
  19. Oh FFS. Just keep your dog on a lead when you're in a 'dog's on lead' area. Be respectful of other people and try not to impose yourself, or your pooch on others in ways which they may not appreciate. It's pretty simple.
  20. Jules-and-Boo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Children should be able to cycle in the park . > They're hardly going to be expert, are they - and > besides, should not have to avoid dogs off their > lead in an area where there are notices saying > 'Keep your dog on a lead'. > > I hope the dog owner apologised. I would have been > mortified if I'd caused a child to be hurt. ^this.
  21. JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > so what will they replace Nines with - Starbucks - > not sure a chain fits that location. Apparently the Nines is now the Copeland Social:
  22. It's OK. Dave on Twitter, has this all covered. Chuka Umunna on @SkyNews going on about letting the people decide the type of Brexit we finish up with. The people have already decided Chuka. Brexit that means Brexit. Simple.— Dave Roberts.🇬🇧 (@Bolddigger52) April 20, 2018
  23. Abe_froeman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > a number of parents of school children > drive to school drop their kids off and then walk > to the station. I don't think the catchments are that big.
  24. Abe_froeman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I would guess that as well as those working in the > schools, a number of parents of school children > drive to school drop their kids off and then walk > to the station. Also there maybe a number of local > residents who normally park here who have gone > away for school holidays in their cars. > > Those affected by a CPZ will have to park outside > someone else's house during the window it operates > in. More of a problem for commuters than staff, I > would think, unless its an all day CPZ . So School staff will have 'to park outside someone else's house'? Nice. Why would a CPZ only effect commuters exactly?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...