Earl Aelfheah

lucy123 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I am the victim That you are trying to expose! I > am horrified you would sink to new lows to shame > people! yes that fine, you can make an allegation > against me but make sure you have the proof (if > any) I do not recall walking past the card shop > and allowing the dog to foul! Do u have > photographic evidence of this? if not then it is > not your place to put my picture online without my > permission, you should go to the council, this is > seen as defimation of character. In you post, you > have presumed quite a lot about me and my > character, which I am very offended and I will > seek advice about you posting my picture. if you > have the actual evidence of the dog pooing, that's > what you should post to shame me, not a picture of > me walking by! > > Ive noticed from all you posts you go round > complaining or critising and now defimation of > character. which is totally unacceptable. > > Is that why you call yourself kidkrugger? does the > name say it all. I'm glad you called me > delightful, I wish I could say the same about you! > > > I hope you realise the extent of damage that you > cause by your behaviour, I'm sure you have no > conscience when it comes to doing the right thing! > > > Are you working for the authorities? if not, them > its not your place to put pictures up with out > permission!, I suggest you take it down. you've > been incredibily unpleasant, at least if I make a > statement, I make a fact statement. So are you saying that you do pick up after your dog, or that there is no evidence that you don't? Must admit, I think the posting of photos / public shaming is a bit much.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Are they ever, if you're not on the beach? > The urban equivalent is Sliders > > These are the gucci ones > > https://www.gucci.com/uk/en_gb/pr/men/shoes-for-me > n/sandals-and-slides-for-men/web-slide-sandal-p-42 > 9469GIB109079?lgw_code=9565-807189669&ranMID=37933 > &ranEAID=gcdL%2FATRVoE&ranSiteID=gcdL_ATRVoE-a.LVc > yPPy351JVo1OegSnQ&utm_source=Linkshare_UK&utm_medi > um=affiliates&utm_campaign=1&utm_content=10&utm_te > rm=2523611&siteID=gcdL_ATRVoE-a.LVcyPPy351JVo1OegS > nQ&PublisherSID=2523611&PubName=Lyst+UK%2FEU Wow! Anyone spending ?180 on Gucci Sliders needs to have a word with themselves

So anyone know when the new 'mural' is going up?

fishbiscuits Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I accept your point. But I think a crackdown on > vehicles should probably be emissions based (or > maybe by size/weight?). A large saloon or estate > could be heavier, and more polluting, than a small > to mid-size SUV. SUVs are generally heavier / less aerodynamic and so more polluting than similar, non-SUV models. They also pose considerably more risk to pedestrians as their increased height causes more upper body injuries even at relatively low speeds and they can easily mount pavements / ride through barriers when out of control. There is no need for people to adopt pseudo military vehicles in the city - we used to mock the US for driving around in these things, now (sadly) Europe seems to be adopting them. They are heavily marketed of course, as the margins are much bigger than on smaller cars. Interesting article on it in the FT this morning: https://www.ft.com/content/2967c9e2-ffc3-11e9-b7bc-f3fa4e77dd47

edbloke Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I?ve noticed those charging points and wondered > the logic of positioning a cluster of them > together on what must be the least populated > street in se22... > I guess it?s cheaper to install them in groups but > one charging point on different streets in the > area, each with a dedicated parking space, would > surely benefit more residents and the environment. ^This. Call me a cynic, but it seems a bit of a tick box (i.e. "we've installed X number of new charging points"). No one is going to park any significant distance from their home and so it would make much more sense to spread them across a number of streets.

The crossing is obvious, there is a blooming big roundabout. It barely needs stating, but cars should not be hitting people and then driving off.

I would like to ban people who stand head down, texting, in segregated bike lanes. Where did people use to stand and text before the segregated bike lane was introduced? I would also like to, maybe not ban, but heavily discourage / tax 4X4s in urban areas. Totally unnecessary and dangerous. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/oct/07/a-deadly-problem-should-we-ban-suvs-from-our-cities

malumbu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "where else is Gethsemane > supposed to go to pee pee" I really hope that is a direct quote. Hilarious.

@dulwichbloke - you're right, there is no link to the parents behaviour and the child having (or not having) ADHD or autism. That said (as it's been raised already), what is the difference between a child diagnosed with ADHD, autism or oppositional defiant disorder and a child regularly acting in a way that is consistent with the behaviour a disorder describes? In other words, are some / any of those disorders more than just a term to describe a set of behaviours? Apologies if that's an ignorant question, but generally interested. Is the difference just a label from a psychiatrist? The suggestion above (and I've heard it before) is that one child (the one whose behaviour has been 'diagnosed') is deserving of help and the other is not, which seems weird to me.

Fry's Chocolate Cream are great. Knocks Haribo out the park. I felt that Brexit extension day was too commercialised this year. Feels like it's losing it's magic.

I've fixed the subject heading for you.

Meadow are absolute vultures. I'm sure their tactics will eventually be rewarded by an inept council.

Are there any joint initiatives going on between Southwark Council and TFL to improve transport in the south of the borough? Cycle hire schemes, new cycleways, imporvements to public transport?

a decent second hand / vintage clothes store.

Sorry for the ignorance, but what's the difference between 'plant based' and vegan?

sandyman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I just saw two parked outside Franklins! > > rahrahrah Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Anyone know whether the Lime bikes are going to > be > > extended to ED? The parking zone currently > stops > > at Camberwell. Yeah, it's not in the parking zone though. The peeps who left them there risk a fine / or ban.

Any chance of Southwark working to bring Lime bikes to East Dulwich?

Anyone know whether the Lime bikes are going to be extended to ED? The parking zone currently stops at Camberwell.

I would still like to know what the aim of the CPZ is. If it's to encourage more 'active travel' and to reduce car usage, then perhaps pedestrianisation and segregated cycle lanes would be a more appropriate response. If it's just about making it easier / more convenient to own a car, then the council should probably be honest about it.

... so absolutely no point in clarifying if this deal is actually what people want.

Apparently everyone who voted 'leave' knew exactly what they were voting for. And it was definitely the deal only agreed upon yesterday and which hardly anyone has actually read in it's entirety. Unless you're a Faragist in which case it is not brexit. But every single 'leave' voter, knew exactly what they were voting for and it was definitely the same thing... which may change massively by the end of the transition period, several years from now.

This thread was about what stores you would like to see on Lordship Lane, not what stores do you like in Peckham.

I would like to see a good burger place offering take outs tbh. Some competition for GBK

Ridgley Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Milan05 > > A great lingerie shop with a good fitting room and > range. > > Good idea I use to love the lingerie shop in > Peckham. There is one up by the Lordship Pub I think.

MJRealDavies Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm all for it. Sick to death of driving around > for 20 minutes looking for a space everytime i > come home. There are more cars than spaces on most streets, especially on those where houses have been split into flats, or there are blocks of flats. A CPZ may make it a little easier to park, but not much and you'll be paying for the privilege of driving around looking for a space. It will also make it a lot more inconvenient to visit others, or have then visit you in the car / deliveries/ builders etc.