Earl Aelfheah

...and whilst I'm sure some on social media might say that of her, no left wing paper or Labour MP would put that forward as a serious allegation. The mainstream right is ridiculous with the hyperbole when it comes to Corbyn.

...there aren't 'reds under the bed' and despite what the more hysterical papers might say, Corbyn is not any kind of 'extremist'. It's like insisting that May is a fascist.

You're perfectly entitled to your views, but if you think he's going to usher in a communist regime, well I think your mistaken (to put it kindly).

The right are also obsessed with describing anything remotely in the centre or to the left of politics as communist. It's silly really. A mixed economy and a democratic society is nothing to do with communism.

I don't get how Boris is still in front bench politics.

Uncleglen perfectly encompasses the Conservative mindset... 'The money I have, I worked hard for. Therefore anyone with less can't be working hard enough'. It's faulty logic and it's egocentric.

Boris Johnsons behaviour gets more and more bizarre. He is a spoilt bully.

Top 5% in terms of income means those bringing in over 70K. I just point this out because no one ever thinks they're 'well off', but actually if you're being paid that amount or more, objectively, you really are. Personally I think people should pay their taxes and be proud to contribute. I know for a fact that I'm not anymore deserving than the single mum working shifts for minimum wage. People should recognise their good fortune to have been born in a certain time and place and to have got some lucky breaks.

titch juicy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Haven't the Telegraph been fairly critical of May > in recent days, or did I imagine that? > > Also, do the polls allow for the silent Tory > voters. That's historically a thing isn't it? Tory > voters who won't admit to being so until marking > the ballot paper? The Telgraph is a joke. take a look. It's basically a conservative campaign pamphlet.

http://visual.ons.gov.uk/welfare-spending/

Someone is flytipping dog poo?!?!

May's response to being asked about why she's sending Rudd to debate in her place is pure David Brent.

I challenge anyone to watch this clip and then tell me that May is strong and stable: https://mobile.twitter.com/BBCNews/status/869908350019829760/video/1

Most popular whine in Peckham 'Dalston has got so mainstream'.

They have separate, distinct, 'town centres' (for want of a better description).

What was May thinking calling this election now. The whole thing is so fecking dispiriting.

Paxman lost IMO. His brand of 'interviewing' is tiresome and hackneyed.

She's awful, but best thing people can do is ignore her.

I read an interesting post by an academic today saying that there is very little capacity in the civil service to deliver anything much in the next parliament. All effort will be focused on Brexit (which is much more complicated than either party admit) and that the short to medium term economic impact of it (something even pro-brexit economists agree will be negative), will severely limit attempts to do much of anything in policy terms. Neither Renationalisations (from Labour), nor big changes to education (from the Tories) are likely to succeed.

Good source of analysis https://election2017.ifs.org.uk/

I don't actually think there is much chance of a Labour victory, but never the less May has royally cocked up this campaign.

LBC still providing a platform for Nasty Nigel of course. Still it's an improvement.

The Daily Mail is a vile rag, so not really that surprising.

It's not that interesting tbh. Not as interesting as a possible swing of 15 points in around 3 weeks. But each to their own.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > you are kidding Rahrahrah? Yes