maxxi

jctg Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I can't wait to see how Dalglish tries to defend > Suarez's actions this afternoon. Maybe he'll just be an a***hole and refuse to discuss it... oh he already has. King Kenny Canute. ETA: After seeing UDT's clip the above can be amended to 'refused to discuss it with BBC and was only porepoared to be interviewed as long as they didn't ask him about it'.

david_carnell Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You can be all done in under an hour! ;-) Nice work 'Flash'.

HALF TIME: Manchester United 0-0 Liverpool. Controversy at the end of the half, as on the whistle, a still irate Suarez boots the ball into the stand. Evans goes up to remonstrate. The ref gets in the way and ushers the players to the tunnel. Seconds before, Dalglish was on the touchline beseeching his player to calm down. He's been anything but calm during this first half.guardian Looks like Dalglish is trying but maybe a little too late.

Go Spanish. Make a tortilla the day before to be eaten cold and do a couple of dishes like albondigas (meatballs) or maybe a chorizo and broad bean fabadas at the same time which can be zapped in the microwave next day. Add a fresh green salad and some melon etc for afters with a couple of botts of cold fizz and Jose's your uncle.

You can see Ferdinand refusing to shake Suarez's hand too

?I?m sure people will want to talk about Luis Suarez, but he accepted his ban, served his suspension and returned against Spurs on Monday,? said Dalglish. ?It?s time for all of us to draw a line under what happened. ?We have spoken to him. I know he will shake the hand of Patrice Evra and the other Manchester United players before the game.? Suarez refuses to shake Evra's hand

Opening this can of eels was always likely to start a shit storm so fine, here it is. I admire PDC's committment and passion and ability. I admire his honesty and the fact he is prepared to say he admired Musso and is dedicated to a bunch of nutters in Rome even though I think he is wrong. He is NOT though - and never has been - a racist and has never - to my knowledge - committed an overt racist act. The infamous salute was punished and his reasons for it may seem twisted and from anyone else would definitely smack of backtracking/excusing it because we like things black or white. He said.. "I am a fascist, not a racist. I give the straight arm salute because it is a salute from a 'camerata' to 'camerati', the salute is aimed at my people. With the straight arm I don't want to incite violence and certainly not racial hatred." So you don't like facism, who does? But your point is cheap and narrow and there have been whole dissertations written on the difference between the tribal loyalty of these so-called ultras and those committed to organising the world along lines of racial purity but that doesn't matter when it comes to scoring cheap points does it? Terry's racism was disgusting in its casualness - why are you not protesting that this thug is going to continue to be allowed to play in English football let alone play for his country? And he is not alone - racism certainly still exists beneath the veneer of a lot of 'respectable' people in football as it does in the rest of society yet those who are good at pretending and/or are punished for the occasional slip as long as they pretend contrition and wear the sackcloth we forgive them. I thought more of you than this kind of Daily Mail knee-jerk crowing but clearly I was wrong.

oilworker Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Given the current Argy sabre rattling isn't it > about time this topic was resurrected?? This topic can only be resurrected if the Islanders state a desire for it to be so. Otherwise there is nothing to discuss. The presence of a moderating-gunship and a minor member of the admin. community are pure coincidence.

Harry's latest briefing makes him sound a little cooler about the England job... what if he DOESN'T take it? Who next? (long term not stop gap). *wonders how long left to make best profit on signed copy of Harry's autobiography*

re the OP - Isn't it Singapore?

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > maxxi Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > red devil Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > > > > Maxxi, friendly question, you don't strike me > as > > a > > > knuckle-dragging bonehead, so I just wondered > > how > > > you squared your obvious liking for Di Canio > > and > > > his well known pro-Mussolini/fascist views... > > > > I don't. > > Hmmmm, any other 'appy Hammers out there care to > expand on this particular moral maze. > For me it's zero tolerance. > So you'll be against Psycho then? And, presumably, wanting any and all managers (and [players etc.) to state their personal political beliefs before they are allowed to work? Good luck with that.

plus ?a change, plus c'est la m?m-....etc.

http://rlv.zcache.com/i_love_foie_gras_heart_t_shirt-p235876042250207222z70ez_152.jpg

I recently read that a supermarket has changed it's aisle posters but can't remember which one My favourite sentence of the day

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Maxxi, friendly question, you don't strike me as a > knuckle-dragging bonehead, so I just wondered how > you squared your obvious liking for Di Canio and > his well known pro-Mussolini/fascist views... I don't.

steveo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You're not local though. Is this suitable for > local people? Only the abridged version which is only available in local shops and only sold to locals with proof of localness.

The frontier surely stretches "To infinitives and beyond!"* *Ad infinitum et ultra! (motto of the Oxford Anarchists)

I always thought it was a subjective opinion; that, as he said it, this was a monologue by Kirk who was always a bit of a div anyway.

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I really don't see the problem with > voluntary/non-paid writing. As hobbies go, it's > far from the worst one I can think of. The > suggestion that they are motivated by vanity or > propaganda has to be one of the most cynical > things I've ever read on this forum! (Sponsored by LOCOG)

aaah, shell envy...

fazer71 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Barings for example totally clueless and look what > happened (I worked there it was comic a disaster > just waiting to happen). J'accuse! Otta Wrote: -------------------------------------------------------- > Unfortunately these days most people think their clubs are more important, and that is a damned shame. Yep. Guilty. The FA was, is and always will be arrogant and incompetent but it is also a self-serving assoc. full of men terrified that they are about to lose their expense accounts. They are constantly making cow eyes at big business to try and attract "The right sort" (like Crozier etc.) into the FA to keep those accounts safe. Guesses about the next manager are fun (and I think Pardew is worth a punt at those odds) but if I think long enough and hard enough I realise that I just don't care... enough. I would rather see Mad-Paulo win something with Swindon before taking over at Upton Park (did you know he's really into "Samurai culture" now? Wonderful!).

Latin infinitives can't be split as they're are one word (usually? always?) but if an English Germanic-Latin mongrel CAN be split then surely it should wallow like a badly made B?arnaise (where the accent, although on the e is always on the aise). El Pibe wrote:> aye, that it be. "Yes, it is," not "That it be". And you don't have to talk in that stupid voice to me, I'm not a tourist!

No, UDT is too busy heading up the London bid for the 2020 Olympics. I tried to tell him it was pointless but he said I was being small minded and that he was doing it to prove a point and that I didn't know what he knew so...