maxxi

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > To be fair, it's difficult to tell how pernickity > they were if they were killed in the > disarrangement of a plane crash, unless they > managed to tidy their immediate environs in the > aftermath of the disruption before succumbing to > an irritably disordered end. Yes but if you sniff them and there's an overwhelming whiff of Vecon you're on the right lines. Hold one up to the light and if there's a translucent element to them they are vegan and safe to eat.

Next week's selections include "The Grayson Perry Story" "Sex and the Single Woman" "Photography for Beginners" "Ways with Offal" and "Road to Singapore" with a preview of Dan Brown's latest "The K.T. Numbers Code"

Snap snap, grin grin, wink wink, nudge nudge, say no more!

katie1997 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Okay...am I 'reading' too much into it? :)) Definitely not - it's like the last scene in The Usual Suspects. Okay... start a thread about something totally obscure and ED-unrelated... then watch that space. (and how did Fabricio the Guido get his own title in there??)

So WTF(?) it is... or Frank's fave FFS(!)

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Don't get me started. > > Gastric infection, lactose intolerance all serve > to make the average North Londoner highly > irritable. > > Despite boycotts of retailers selling non-aged > cheese, there's a massive and violent underground > network controlling supplies and milking the > profits. > Which they presumably make into the highly sought after but illegal 'conflict cheese'.

Try a post about the effects of soft cheeses on rioting youth and see how he/she/it responds - on second thought don't; someone else is bound to find a corollary (Huge stop wiki-ing 'Roquefort Riots and the Brie Brouhaha').

richardbach Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > evryone goes on about th heaters and the global > warming but no one talks abuot the warming from > the cigaretres strange isnt it But that's the Government's fault because every packet carries a Government Health Warming. Edited to point up the severely weak pun so the dickylittlebot can have another go.

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > SpaghettiSue40 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Now you are both being silly, but surely there > > must be an instant 'bullet' that isnt fatal. > Any > > scientists or inventors out there? > > In Australia they are working on a rifle that > fires a venomous snake at speed. In tests the > snake will bite the target 99 out of 100 times. > Once incapaciated, which takes a couple of > seconds, the aggressor can be given the antidote > to the snake's poison to ensure death does not > occur. It should be in use soon. > BTW No harm comes to the creature Ah yes the Viper Sniper, often used in conjunction with the Quokka Stoppa, a bazooka-like weapon which fires this small marsupial at locked doors etc. to gain entry.

And how did crabs get in on the act? Or is crab patty the bad tempered one in "Charlie Brown - The Director's Cut"?

BR is like ManC players - he has realised he doesn't like Manchester and wants a transfer to an Italian club.

Or at least a cryptic clue?

Frank- It smells no nicer than champagne on another's breath (have you ever smelled that when not drinking yourself? It is pretty vile) or indeed any other alcoholic beverage or coffee or milk (ever kissed a girl who'd just had a glass of milk? Eeeew!) and not just drink; pate, garlic, cheese - well the ways we pollute each others' spaces with our exhalations are numerous - as D-Fox has suggested. For the smell on clothing - well the smoking ban means most people only ever smoke out of doors so it is often hard to say whether the smell is tobacco or petrol fumes. Does it taste nice? To me, yes. I only smoke an average of 4-5 a day these days and so am more discerning about my weed of choice but can definitely say that a good Havana dipped in a fine Armagnac is as exquisite as OW suggets. Having said this I would no more advocate your taking up the hobby than I would TM eating FG on toast.

Nette Curtain: Well (speaking on my own behalf and not Huggy's) perhaps if you stopped taking commets out of $ucking context they wouldn't cause such sickness. For someone who uses words like 'hate' and 'disgust' as freely as you do it is surprising that my obviously deliberate hyperbole should be so wilfully misinterpreted as to upset you so much. No it isn't. You have your corsets done up too tight. Frankie: I have not the words to describe the joys of tobacco to a non smoker anymore than I could describe the pleasure of a rare stake to little Tommy M without causing him to think me mad or making him feel a trifle unwell. I will offer this only:

The case against - Frankito Today, 10:52AM The case for- Wiki [quote name=Mills stipulated that McCartney had to agree to stop smoking cannabis before she agreed to marry him, complaining that he used the drug "as regularly as others drink cups of tea", and that she has never taken any illegal drugs in her life.[]

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You bast*rd Accepted and acknowledged. *Plays new Brubeck arrangement "Take Seventy Three" on sousaphone*

Roll up gentlemen and ladies, put your punditry skills on the line... With the joy of life 'OTP' about to start (Hull v Blackpool 7.45 tonight - on Sky) it's time for the ritual froth-blowing of prediction time! Top three Championship - West Ham (naturally), Leicester City (a decent squad and lots of money). These two seem to be the popular choice of pundits with opinion split on the third contender between Forest, Cardiff, B'ham, Boro and Ipswich, I'm going for the latter. Next......? (reading Ian Holloway's comments on mental state of Blackpool - low happiness/sunshine index - they look to be in for a tough time... unless it's all a bluff?)

When there are, for example, 360 views and only 25 posts - how many lurkers there are out there... and what are they doing?

73 *allowed after leaving more than enough time for LM, AM etc to poach*

seventy three (as in No. 73 - kid's programme from 1980's - five points AND a thread relevant bonus of 2) ETA: I dare you to besmirch the chapel of rest LM and AM, I just dare you. *hears high pitched giggling and creaking of chapel door being opened*

Annette Curtain Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > maxxi Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > > > It's bad enough we have to smoke outside now > leave us the @#$%& alone! > > Of course your right, we should leave you "the > @#$%& alone". > > In your own house or flat preferably, which no > doubt would smell even worse were you to inflict > the 500 odd chemicals + the smell of your rancid > habit on only yourself. > > But no, you come out to a very nice pub > garden/park/outside space ( the closest we get to > fresh air ) and sit there puffing away on your > shite brand of choice, turning the air rancid and > making every other persons space, whether they > want it or not, more toxic. > > Of course it's currently your right to do so, but > we hate you. That's us, the ones forced to stay > indoors or up-wind & you and your likes whinge and > moan about human rights. > > You disgust me, why not stay at home next time > with a can or a bottle or two. > > So yes, It's bad enough we have to put up with you > smoking outside, but please now leave us the @#$%& > alone! > > Personally & if it were legal, i'd gladly Taser > anyone who did it near me. > > > Other than that; how was your day ? > > > NETTE:) > > * swishes hair, files nails * So glad you didn't stoop to ridiculous hyperbole just to show you're determination not to be poisoned to death by armies of smokers pinning you to the ground and breathing up your nose. Of course if you got your way and smoking was banned in areas outside pubs/restaurants the patio heater problem would still exist and probably more so because, according to you, there would be legions of 'fresh air' freaks fighting to get into the 'garden/park/outside space' so more patio heaters would be required. I didn't say anything about human rights but I suppose you're the kind who believes that throwing that into any/every argument makes you a post modern political heavyweight rather than a neurotic whinger who is permanently frustrated at the world not going the way they would wish it. And my day was fine, thankyou.B) *lights up stinking Chernobyl of a stogie and walks s-l-o-w-l-y past pavement cafes*

Moos Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ian! No-one likes a sneak. > > Maxxi, *Be-Bob* better be careful. One slip and > he could turn into *BeBobALooLaaShe'sMyBaby*, and > that's a whole other jive. Just don't ask *BeBob* if he swings.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Make it stop, make it stop, make it stop!!! > > It's like Groundhog Day, I keep clicking this > thread, but nothing new has actually been said > since about page ... 2? > > Just let it die in peace, like an old aged goose! Not until we (that's not the assumed 'we' of benevolent coercion but the implicit 'we' of a group of ugly men with torches) have caused its liver to explode and can all lick bits off the walls of this thread. *crouches with a small bottle of truffle oil - waiting to spring... and smoking next to a fucking patio heater fuck you*

Actually section 13, subsection 9, clause vii, para 4(b) "Laddy! Stop fucking around!" *detects smell of scousers 'scent' and exits with hanky held to nose*

That last one looked like veering off into a Glaswegian vernacular a la "Get te fuck!" but that the fingers rebelled in sheer anger and frustration so what was fixed was prbably something like "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!!!"