I think some people say bad things about Kings just because it's not as new and shiny as Tommy's and they take that as meaning it's not as good. For every birth horror story you'll hear about Kings, there's a birth horror story for Tommy's. My wife had our first daughter at Tommy's (long drawn out induction, 2009) and our second at Kings (C-Section, 2011), and had a weeks stay after each. The room she stayed in at Tommy's was a bit nicer, with a better view, but other than that, we felt Kings edged it. But basically they are both major London hospitals with some of the best medical professionals out there on their staff. You'll get good care at either. Main thing that made us chose Kings second time round was the thought of a mad rush to Tommy's with wife in the throws of labour. As it was we avoided that both times, but the thought of that journey was not a happy one. Good luck.