I'm totally with Piers on the recent Batman films. Kickass does indeed kickass. I watched Scott Pilgrim recently, and can't really remember it, which suggests it didn't do much for me... Or I put too much in a joint that evening.
I used to really like the Lethal Weapon films too (Patsy Kensit in LW2... Thwoar), but not seen any of them in a long time. Think I'll keep it that way, so as not to shatter the memories.
Could anyone who ever uses this station please have a look at this, and sign the petition. It's probably the most inaccessible station I have ever seen for buggies, and disabled people! Petition
My wife salutes magpies, but never seen her spit. I do the 3 drain thing, although I will walk on them, so long as my foot doesn't touch down on the third drain.
When I have Cottage / Shepherds pie (in private), I still mash all the mince & potato in to one big thing of baby food. Always find it difficult to not do this in company! Oh, and I still don't step on the cracks of the pavement.
Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > but it is the mother that carries and gives birth > to children. It's that bond that gives the mother > more right under the law over the father > > Though probably the view of the family court as > well (sadly), that theory is rubbish in so many > ways. And damaging to the child. Quite!
A shame, but to be honest, I'm never convinced this sort of thing really gets much of a message across anyway. It's a bit like preaching to the choir, as the only people who probably pay attention are those who're already on board.
Will have to look out for that. I'm not big in to Action films, but occasionally I really enjoy one. I was very very surprised to really enjoy the new A-Team film recently. I'm not even sure Enemy of the state is an Action film as such. It has a nice dollop of comedy from Smith, good rapport between Smith & Hackman, and it's at a very good pace, which keeps you interested.
Couldn't agree more. Within social care, it used to be that social workers would climb the ladder in to management. These days however, managers are coming in as managers, if that makes sense. I think there are pros and cons to this, but that is another discussion for another time.
I know lots of jobs are through graduate schemes, and not saying that is wrong, but equally, I think people can have a lot more to offer than a degree qualification, and it would be a shame if these people were excluded.
david_carnell Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'd rather my > public servants were paid well and hose jobs were > seen to be the real plum ones for graduates rather > than Deloittes or KPMG. > > Pay peanuts, get monkeys? Fair points, although I hate to see jobs reserved for graduates. People without degrees are not necessarily the monkies.
I'm interested to know what you think of my idea of keeping T&Cs as they are for existing employees, but changing them for new recruits? I guess a down side would be that the old skool would never move on, but rather cling to their posts, although they'd get around that by restructuring.