edhistory
-
Posts
1,944 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Events
Blogs
FAQ
Tradespeople Directory
Jobs Board
Store
Everything posted by edhistory
-
Are high rise buildings in and around ED safe?
edhistory replied to trinidad's topic in General ED Issues / Gossip
Can anyone locate the Ledbury report? -
Film or TV crew on Dunstans Road
edhistory replied to holwil86's topic in General ED Issues / Gossip
edcam Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It's the production company's responsibility to > make good any damage caused by filming. This can > often be very expensive but nothing to do with > your own insurance. Is it prudent for the "host" to take out temporary additional public liability insurance as this commercial activity is unlikely to be covered by the "host's" regular insurance and as protection if a claim arises and the production company's insurance is defective? -
Film or TV crew on Dunstans Road
edhistory replied to holwil86's topic in General ED Issues / Gossip
These filmings are good news. Southwark Council gets revenue from issuing a permit to the filming company for using the public domain for commercial purposes. HMRC gets a tax payment from the resident after the tax return showing the fee from the filming company is submitted. -
This is documented on page 14 of "SOUTHWARK" Issue 17 Summer 2017. Was this in any sense "advertised" in East Dulwich?
-
> Even this government can't strip people of citizenship though. I thought the government could as long as it does not render a person stateless.
-
This appeared in the Dulwich Society eNews 46 August 2017: "Southwark Council has appointed consultants Steer Davies Gleav to identify measures to reduce traffic in Village, College and East Dulwich wards. If you have suggestions, or comments on the strategy, please copy them to [email protected] for incorporation in the Society?s response. Feel free to ?phone Alastair Hanton, the Chair of the Society?s Traffic and Transport Committee on 020 8693 2618." Does anyone know how to access any documents? Reducing traffic through East Dulwich might be difficult.
-
How will this project mitigate for self-selection bias?
-
former East Dulwich councillor - how can I help?
edhistory replied to James Barber's topic in General ED Issues / Gossip
> Hi first mate, > i'd rather people didn't empty such bins on the road - possibly gets things resolved but what a res and work for > the street cleaners to clear-up. Not good. ? -
Just in case you have not read it: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/commissioning-letter-to-the-migration-advisory-committee
-
> if Tart group are in the business of purchasing freehold property they must be generating a lot of spare cash Is this the "Tart group" being discussed? https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08620955/filing-history
-
Somewhere I have an original pre-1914 manuscript which explains this. I'll try to find it and scan it on Sunday. ------------ RendelHarris: That software you used to map that Peck watershed was very helpful. Thank you again.
-
3/10 for not getting a drink? What sort of metric is this? Is it a typo for 0/10?
-
Now renamed to "The Monty Bojangles Company Ltd". ??
-
Just my imagination.
-
I thought Alan Yentob had left the BBC.
-
And I'd prefer not to know what sort of butter Seabag prefers.
-
Sentencing guideline here: https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/about-sentencing/about-guidelines/
-
Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The full name has now been amended - to be > replaced, substantially, with xs - that may be > enough. It would probably have been better to say > something on the lines of 'the boy, who had a > knife in his pocket, and who drove the bike away, > has been identified and the name supplied to the > police and his school.' That way at least there > could be no real issue of a sub-judice problem. > > Whilst the age of criminal responsibility is 10 in > England, young people who are charged with and > convicted of crimes may be covered (under the age > of 18) by reporting restrictions - prima facie the > original post would have been in breach of these > had they been applied for, so the removal of the > name (and possibly the boy's school as well) would > be necessary to meet any such reporting > restriction. I was referred to "The Magistrate" magazine of May 2017 where there is a detailed up-do-date summary for Magistrates on Youth Panels of the extensive law on disclosing "Children's" names. The article in each case either refers to the specific legislation or case law. Southwark Libraries can probably supply a copy of the article if anyone wants to read it. All the references are to when a case is sub-judice. There is no definition of when sub-judice start to run. So that leaves two further points: 1] When does sub-judice start? 2] is it only libel law that applies before then? -
So, what is you reason to besmirch a Nunhead baker?
-
It's derogatory hearsay from a long time ago.
-
> but my friend was left in no doubt as to the owners feelings at the time. So it's hearsay.
-
That doesn't answer my question about whether the post was evidence based.
-
> Google 'bakers butter alternatives' Are you saying, from evidence, that Ayres uses this ingredient and Tart does not?
-
Seabag Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > And I've used Ayes when passing for 20 + years, > only not for Flan as I don't like undercooked > soggy pastry and industrial butter in mine. > > You might like that kind of thing, but it's pretty > low grade in my opinion. > How did you learn about "industrial butter".
-
I'll get back to actual detail of the Bill later. > Good points there Loz. I like fantasy futureology too. > before midnight on 30 March 2019. I might have missed it but the Bill has an "exit date" and does not refer to a specific date of 30 March 2019.