edhistory

The draft of DoRA #3 will have been ready for activation since 1952.

> We are informing archaeologists of the ongoing destruction of this Victorian site. [savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk] The last review of Southwark APZs was done in 2015. It can be found on the Southwark Council web-site.

Ms Cameron was also doing archaeology in 2012. The National Planning Policy Framework and Archaeology

None of the above.

rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Chapter 5 can be found here Thanks rendelharris. We now have the law about the signage and ground markings that make a "cycle lane" legal. There seems to be some doubt about whether this is in fact a "cycle lane". We now need to find the Traffic Management Order [TMO] that permitted the introduction of a "cycle lane". This should be somewhere in the London Gazette.

This is the banner I like. I'd like to visit it and take a photograph. Does anyone know here it was installed? Still not found the documents on the Southwark Council web-site. I'm also interested in the mechanism by which Lambeth businesses refunded Southwark Council.

"Honor Oak Nature Corridor" What is the proper name for this area?

"Honor Oak Nature Corridor" What is the proper name for this area?

Here's an extract from the official Traffic Signs Manual Chapter 3 [2008]. Can anyone locate a copy of Chapter 5 and get s screen-grab of the required Diagram 1049 or 1049.1 white lines? ======================== 17.33 Where a footway (forming part of a road) or footpath (e.g. through a park) has been converted to a route shared by pedestrians and cyclists, signs to either diagram 956 or 957 are used. These prohibit the use of the route by any other vehicles. The sign to diagram 956 indicates an unsegregated route. It should be located where the shared route begins and must be used as a repeater, at regular intervals(direction 11), to remind both pedestrians and cyclists that pedal cycles can be legally ridden on the footway or footpath. The sign to diagram 957indicates a segregated shared route that should be delineated by a continuous white marking to either diagram 1049 or 1049.1 (see para 16.15 in Chapter 5). The sign may be reversed in a mirror image according to which side of the route is used by cyclists and which side by pedestrians. The sign should be located at the start of the segregated route and must be used as a repeater at regular intervals along the route (direction 11).

Does this mean that this "cycle lane" does not have the legally required markings?

Just a reminder that the Roman Fort is fake history. The iron age mound in the middle of woodland?

That was not the law when I looked into this matter in 2015 for a near neighbour. Laws change. Mr Barber will be able to answer your questions after the election.

Sally Eva Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The Bike Train is for the fainthearted :) Designed > by me for the gentle natured > > https://southwarkcyclists.org.uk/events/bike-train > -to-central-london-and-beyond-6/ 148. Safe driving and riding needs concentration ------------------------------------------------ Avoid distractions when driving or riding such as * loud music (this may mask other sounds) * trying to read maps * starting or adjusting any music or radio * arguing with your passengers or other road users * eating and drinking * smoking

I like the three flying street vermin banner. Are the documents now published?

Otta Wrote: > > The problem with your argument is that boundaries > change. By your logic, none of us live in London, > because there will be a map somewhere showing it. > Sorry but post codes are the modern boundaries. > SE15 = Peckham. I understand your argument that Nunhead ceased to exist in 1917 when it was allocated a SE15 post code.

Southwark Council operatives have previously asserted that this is an eco-crime. Policy may have changed. Mr Barber will know the answer.

BrandNewGuy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yeah, they've been out and about for the last week > or so around here. It's quite unnerving when one > flies near you ? they fly like those hulking great > military transporter planes. Nationally they're > rare, so we should take care of our local > population ? rotting wood and stumps are great for > the larvae to feed on. Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. Protected species. The DHFC planning application needs to be re-written?

PeckhamRose Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for this. We love our map, but have little > wall space left! In 1865 there was a House of Lords inquiry into the theft of Peckham Rye Common land by the Lord of The Manor. At para 3259 of the minutes is corroboration of the map details. A comparison of the map scan with a modern map shows how much land was stolen, described as "small encroachments" at para 3274. We also have the matter of leaseholders' gravel extraction rights. It's good to get a another confirmation that the Lambeth Group underlies the common and not London Clay. [bTW there is nothing in subsequent legislation to suggest that the leaseholders' mineral rights were extinguished] The matter of the SE15 post code can wait until later.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Crystal Palace Park was once > Penge Fields. Penge was also once part of Battersea.

Do they roost near Railway Rise?

PeckhamRose Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Can't resist, sorry. > The Postcodes define it all. If your address is > SE15 you ain't in Dulwich. > Peckham Rye PARK is SE22 > Peckham Rye COMMON is SE15. > (The Peckham Society get very excited about this > when someone gets it wrong.) Neat wind-up. The copy of the 1799 map I gave you has a blue line that shows the Friern Manor boundary. The other side of the blue line is Buckingham Manor. I have uploaded a scan of the relevant area of the map for those who have not seen the full map. The offer of free copies still stands. The matter of the SE15 post code can wait until later.

Domino's is poor man's art deco. The sort you don't find in the architectural history books. Infra dig. A better preserved example is over at Nunhead.

I'm expecting the Picturehouse to appear on Mr Barber's list when he releases it.

Who is the Data Controller who is responsible for has custody of the petition?

Was that an illegal banner I saw outside Oddono's?