edhistory

On 22 May 2017 Mr James Barber twittered in favour of FOCC/SSW activities.

Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > In many ways it's a great shame to see them go - > despite being built of asbestos sheet Does anyone know a location for the construction plans? Thanks.

Who is the Data Controller who is responsible for has custody of the petition?

> Managed to attend walkabout along Lordship Lane with council officers and fellow councillor looking at breaches of Planning and advertising rules. Determined to tidy Lordship Lane up. Did the council officers trip or stumble over the paving stones? Are non-orthogonal paving stones untidy?

The rafters/lofts of Railway Cottages?

Who is the Data Controller who is responsible for has custody of the petition?

Burbage Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > A more immediate question might be what's > happening to the collected signatures? Who holds > them now, was a fully-compliant Fair Processing > Notice issued, and were appropriate contact > details provided? > > Such minutiae are often overlooked, but Data > Protection doesn't just cover electronic data and > SSW/FOCC don't appear to have either a privacy > policy or a physical address. As I'd hate anyone > to get into any more trouble on account of such > minor lapses, I'd suggest they sort that out > first. It is an offence to hold such data without a registered Data Controller. It is an offence not to reveal the Data Controller on request. It is an offence not to provide a data subject with a copy of their held data. The Register is here: https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/what-we-do/register-of-data-controllers/

The post by burbage is worthy of a closer read.

"should"?

If anyone wants to drop by and pick up a free copy of the Friern Manor map... There's an on-line copy of the map of the Northern part of East Dulwich Parish. SE22 only defines the area where the sorting office at Silvester Road delivers post.

dbboy: I don't think you'll get answers from the FOCCers.

Ms Cameron missed this: 1. Who are the Officers of FOCC? 2. Where is the constitution of FOCC and is it publicly available? 3. Are FOCC meetings minuted and where are the meeting minutes published? 4. What is the relationship between FOCC and SSW? 5. How are FOCC funds managed? 6. When are you actually serving Southwark Council with an injunction? And finally Why were you barred by FONC?

Domino's Pizza!

The site was 203-205 Crystal Palace Road. The photograph from 2008 that Mike found was the earliest I have seen. The abused building has still has sufficient diagnostics. If anyone has an earlier photo, or took a destruction in progress photo, I would like to see it/them. There is still a standing similar building at 6-12 Grove Vale.

Some of the very young people in the photographs may have been unable to read the petition.

Different valley.

nxjen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > AFAIR when the Glazer Delmar sign appeared at the > end of North Cross Road, JB was outraged it had > been put up without planning permission. I spoke with a GD representative at the Goose Green fete. It is possible that no-one has made an official approach about this.

Paragraph 243 of the Highway Code (not parking within 10m from a junction) appears to be guidance only and not legislation. Can someone clarify?

> The Labour councillor agreed the recommendations. Does this person have a name?

> As a business woman The official record shows the cleaning company is owned by a man,

The sole director of the cleaning company is the same person who registered the internet domain. "New kid on the block" is rather appropriate given his date of birth. I don't like parasites. John K

The submitted planning application documents include a geotechnical survey report that confirms that Lambeth Group geology lies immediately under the made ground. No London clay.

Is William Brooker Mr Shitcake?

You would expect to find a previous valuation with measurements like this: https://www.tax.service.gov.uk/view-my-valuation/cca/previous-properties/valuation/18019914000/12364289000?uarn=2332381000 along with a current valuation with measurements. But they are not there for 84-90 Lordship Lane.

I went to find the Valuation Officer's measurement of the 84-90 Lordship Lane ground floor footprint. This was to: a) compare the measured footprint with the planning permission b) calculate the amount of the car park built over This is what I got: https://www.tax.service.gov.uk/view-my-valuation/cca/detail/342908075