edhistory

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Daisys, bluebells, etc from the park or woods - > fine. Picking protected English bluebells not fine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyacinthoides_non-scripta

Thank you for the photographic updates that show the good progress being made.

What happened to Mr Schaffer's body fluids running down the gutters of Forest Hill Road?

I'm having difficulty in placing the Normnan Hurford photograph in 1950. http://dulwichonview.org.uk/2014/08/27/recycled-war-stretchers/ Attached is a wartime photo with white paint black-out rings on the trees. Anyone?

I believe one of these is Lewis

> commissioned by Southwark Council

Elphinstone's Army Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > East Dulwich has made itself what it is.. years > ago it was a well dodgy area Ignorant.

Are the graves of our war heroes no longer part of the narrative? What is the earliest 4ate that plot of land has been called "The Glade"?

> the buffer zone on One Tree Hill next to the Ancient Woodland Nature Reserve, part of the Great North Wood. This is untrue as HopOne can confirm.

Alternative-geographies. Please can someone let me know: the derivation of the term "The Glade" the location of "The Glade" (a rough line-drawn boundary on a Google map will suffice. Thank you.

Here is an example of Southwark Council propaganda for the black business ghetto.

I think you have a map of the part East Dulwich that is Mr Barber's patch.

So, I'm right.

> Southwark council have before tried to turn the playing fields into burial space. There was a huge outcry about this (quite right too, this is Honor Oak Park and is there for community use) and they backed down, though only temporarily I might add. Camberwell Council acquired land for future burials. This land is temporarily used for playing games.

Court Lane Lordship Lane Mount Avon Park (obscured) Photo taken from the watchtower of East Dulwich Fire Station.

Nearest I've got.

taper Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I've asked all my friends, and 97% of them love > it. They cannot wait for the banners to appear. Interesting arithmetic.

The metrics are confusing. There are not 35 lamp posts in North Cross Road. I count 9 lamp posts in North Cross Road. This would work out at ?2,379 per banner. Some clarification is required.

What is the "HSC" that is providing funds? Is this the Southwark Budget funding the West Dulwich lamppost banners? http://dulwichfestival.co.uk/love-west-dulwich-lamp-post-art-banner-competition/

alice Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > agreed, surely there must be a procedure to un > ringfence funds. CGS is not statutory. This does not seem to be money from the "CGS" budget. It seems to be money from the High Street Challenge Fund. Mr Barber will be able to clarify this and also tell us how much money has been awarded to this initiative.

Now corrected by bob to 1918. > it has been here since time 1922

I'm told you need to know the time of day each photograph was taken.

But, but, but... The LMA have licensed this picture for commercial exploitation: https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00G35YM64/ref=ox_sc_sfl_title_2?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A4CE0FZJ4BQ3L If it is on Amazon it must be correct. rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > OK I've spent far too long on this but I do find > it fascinating: just realised the LMA doesn't in > fact call it "The junction of Lordship Lane and > Dulwich Common" as above, just "Lordship Lane, > Camberwell."

You've just captured the watershed between the Peck basin and the East Dulwich streams basin.

rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Old Handy must have been a rotten painter then, as > s/he clearly shows the road curving down to the > right then going slightly uphill into the distance > - whereas I know, as it's one of my favourite > local take a breather freewheels, that Court Lane > runs downhill all the way into Dulwich, 72 feet of > descent, 0 ascent! I think we're on the way to making the point. As you know how to do it a Google elevation on a line between Goose Green roundabout and Kings Arms crossroads should prove an interesting landscape point.