I agree with him! Just look at all the complaints that we have on the Forum that are caused by an excess of trees: Lost Cats - with no trees you could actually see the little blighters Stabbings - the potential murderers hide behind the trees, thus the trees are themselves culpable in these assaults and deserve the chop Lost tortoises - see Lost Cats Loud Birds - no trees, no nests, no birds, no noise No social life - meet new friends chopping down trees Falling property prices - prices have dropped since more trees have been planted, clearly there is a causal link between these two phenomena - down with trees, up with the prices UFOs - Aliens hide in the trees and spy on us Too much light from street lights - fewer trees means that more moonlight would penetrate to street level and so we would need fewer street lights Oil prices - burn trees for fuel, if the Victorians could do it, so can we Global warming - fewer trees means less woodage acting as a thermal blanket and so the Globe would cool down Housing shortages for key workers - chop the trees down and build wooden houses on the municipal Parks for the key workers Local pubs closing - fewer trees (and the resulting key worker new housing) means fewer parks to go for walks in and so more time to spend in pubs Over-pressed NHS - fewer trees, fewer falling branches, fewer visits to A&E Peckham - the key worker's new housing on Goose Gree and the Rye would act as a barrier to the Peckhamites Public transport - erm ....DO I HAVE TO THINK OF EVERYTHING!