Salsaboy

I never go there, it's too scary.

I like the inside of my meat pink.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-20680924 When are they going to drag themselves out of the 14th century?

Great post Woody. woodrot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > best buy a new cat. > > Ive got a tailess one in stock at the minute. > choose from ginger, piebald, taupe or fallow and > ball classic tabby - its a loveable tom/ queen, > likely unneutered, loving personality, delightful > decor, ( GSH not tested ), freehold, aged between > 3 weeks and 8 years.can deliver in SE22 or > guaranteed tracked next day delivery before 1PM in > a custom made, air pocketed hardwearing A4 jiffy > bag. ?45 all in.

So it turns out that Patrick Moore was a pead.......What? Not yet? Ok.

Err....

Take it's horns off, wipe it's arse and put it on a plate.

If we weren't meant to eat cows, why are they made of meat?

I did wonder .......

Very sad.

1380 seconds.

You can shove a cork up their poo-holes.

I had my credit card cloned last year whilst I was in the States. They managed to place 3 ?1000 bets on-line with Paddy Power in 2 minutes before it was stopped.

We should never have given up our Empire.

Similar to http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1012767

Jeremy, are you implying that paying 'cash in hand' will go straight into the pocket without being declared as income? If you employ a tradesman 'cash in hand' it's no business of yours what that tradesman does with the money. You are not liable in their financial affairs and the transaction is between you and the tradesman, not you, the tradesman and HMRC. I'm a self-employed tradesman and to be honest, cash is a pain in the arse. I still have to take it to the bank to get it into my account (ALL of it goes through my books) and I much prefer an electronic transfer straight into my bank account. Jeremy Wrote: > But I hope these people also never pay a trademan > cash-in-hand.

@ Snowy. Well not run over but a bit squished. @ AM. Noticed when I was close up to her, advising about her lights.

Lots & lots of free publicity for them, on the BBC no less. Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The UK public should consider a boycott > irrespective of the 10/20m. Its a relatively > inexpensive publicity stunt.

I can't stand those Russian dolls. They're so full of themselves.

I get loads of those to a junk email account I have on Yahoo. I always reply saying that the sender sounds like a nice young lady and I would like to meet her. I always offer to pay the air-fare but haven't had one take the offer up yet. :(

I was driving through the backstreets of Camberwell yesterday about 5.30pm, so nice and dark. Saw an attractive young lady on her bicycle with no lights on, so wound down my window and said very politely "I can't see you as you have no lights on your bike". Got told in a refined voice to "F*ck off, it's none of your business". In a way I hope she gets run over by an HGV to teach her a lesson.

?10m a year? Loose change to them. Bloody disgrace.

Clifford really is a slimeball.

I'm happy. I'm 48. Does that make me middle aged?

*Quickly packs suitcase full of fifty pound notes and heads for Switzerland* Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > New ?77m funding for HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) > in this Spending Review period to expand their > anti-avoidance and evasion activity, specifically > those focusing on offshore evasion and avoidance > by wealthy individuals and by multinationals. > This is expected to bring in an additional ?2bn > per year in tax that would have otherwise gone > unpaid