*Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > There's a lot of talk (and pictures) about the > clothes online, but talk of 'rucking' (plus > pictures) is never far behind. > > So was 'football hooliganism' (as it became know) > nothing more than the definitive gang culture of > the age, no more than Teddy Boys, Gangstas etc > etc? Or was it something else? And youthculture I was actually a soulboy rather than a casual, post punk about 1979 I decided to be a soulboy (a southern largely funk/jazz funk orientated scene rather than the more retro and more famous Northern soul scene concentrating on older obscure soul music) as a fair few of my mates were doing that and I liked the music and wanted to be in on a youth culture as punks moment had gone and the retro mod revival that was ongoing was just pathetic I thought and New Romantics were just London artschool types. Our 'look' then was largely very straight or 'pegged' jeans, legwarmers (yup!) flat shoes (not trainers) or plastic sandals/espadrilles in summer, white socks, various tops - Fred Perrys/baseball tops/Hawaiian shirts/tank tops and even cardigans! (it changed frequently) - but not especially sports casual?as the labels etc weren?t really available or relevant in the UK then. The main thing that identified a soulboy then was the wedge haircut, based on Bowie and Ferry 1976ish, I proudly got my first one in 1979. Being a soulboy wasn't especially linked to Football, it was strongly linked to going clubbing (Goldmine Canvey Island, Flicks Dartford, Royalty Southgate being examples) and of course to the soul weekenders at Caister and the music. However, most soulboys were white southern suburban working class lads so many went to football. I remember that West Ham well into 1981/2 was still very much a post punk/oi/nu-skinhead look with Harringtons and loafers/DMs still much in evidence. The Southbank at Upton Park was still then pretty much green or black zipper Harrington?s and short hair. Suddenly in 82ish that look went and most youths started adopting a vague soulboy look and then added the sports casual Scouser thing too. I think the look just became more universal and the hooligans - and remember hooliganism had been around since the 1960s - adopted it. What then happened was that then it suddenly mattered that your lot looked better than the other lot and that accelerated the label/casual thing ? I just wasn?t into that then as fundamentally I was thinking we soulboys have had those flicky haircuts and cared about our clothes for years and you lot suddenly think you?re cool but I?m sure that just reflects my age. I was never a casual, my brother whose 7 years younger than me was. So, casuals just became the universal look (and for a smaller elite a culture) for much workingclass youth and as Acid Casual said some of these went to football and some were hooligans too but the connection was as tenuous as that?Casual weren?t causal (see what I did there) in football violence.