Jules-and-Boo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > that's SO funny - thanks Uncle Glen. > > so - back to the railways (chocolate is better)... > the EU's objective in the First Railway Directive > is clearly to "open up national freight and > passenger markets to cross-border competition?. > Hardly a precursor for nationalising railways - > more about making money from the customer, which > is pretty much where we are now.... focus on > profit, lack of customer care....priorities, > priorities... > > Yes, it may have a caveat that it is ok with > local/ urban or suburban lines - that's not really > the point - is it. > > Under EU law, it's now a legal requirement for > independent companies to be able to apply for > non-discriminatory track access on a member > state's track.... > > Happy commuting? Because nationalised railways were so great, oh yes. There's some very rose tinted glasses about how great trains were pre-nationalisation in reality they were sh1te with terrible reliability and zero service ethic from the vast majority of employees. The massive increase in train traffic since privatisation reflects the massive improvement in stock, services and reliability despite the ridiculous 'truth' that things were so much better before. Crap.