????

I'm quite happy with sound argument against Tony's points of which there have been many - but calls to ban, abuse and accusations of racism without firm evidence all sound knee jerk illiberal reactions. Personally, I try my best to fight prejudice everywhere not just those ones that tick the boxes at SE22 dinner parties

taper Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > No-one has a right to free speech on a private > site such as this. What is allowed and what isn't > is, within the law, a matter for the owner. > > All that said, i don't think TLS is malign; just > your standard issue Daily Mail reader, with a bad > case of rosetinteditus. It is incumbent on us to > make plain to him where he is talking out his > backside. And let us hope that the discourse > tempers his views a little. I don't think he's > been particularly bad on this thread. He has come > closer to crossing the line elsewhere. Well said Taper - and although he's quite capable of looking after himself, I don't think hes should be subject to personal abuse (with some fairly implicit chuckling support from several posters) or accusations of racism without some serious evidence. The worst bits of cliquiness that do from time to time emerge on here.

Is it easy to get the "Scores on the doors" admin?....I'm worried I may creeping into the top 20

You're a liberal You're a racist fascist There are smears and there are smears Thus speak a true liberal

We bow to you oh keef :)-D

Liberals in not being very liberal shocker

So to not share or even question the liberal view on immigration's effects on society makes you a BNP voter.......mmmm if you can't ban 'them' smear them?

What, because 'we' don't like their views. I think this thread shoule be removed. Liberal-lite censorship at it's worse. Tone bangs on and on and gets on my nerves from time to time but there are some truths in there for largely white middle-class SE22. Disgraceful idea on any levels.

..more Jermaine Pennant

She's doing the roofs on an estate in Macclesfield this weekend..cash in hand

go on, pile in and post something...all us regulars will stay off it (apart from BBW who has tourettes) Fill ya boots. (no references to Fulham punk band of same name pleas Jah/Honnie)

God - everything was like this in the 70s when the Unions ruled the world. A few of these 'customers are scum' rather than those that pay our wages industries still exist - interestingly ther are split between heavily unionised industries (think tube and buses) and banks......

Isn't that the one for working class scum?

SimonM Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > As I sit here, with a fine view of Lake Brienz, > and log on to the EDF courtsy of my nice new > Swisscom dongle, I feel as a smug Yorkshireman > (ignores cries of "Is there any other kind?!") I > should remind you all that England usually only > wins the Ashes when captained by a Yorkshireman. > This season looks unlikely to break this pattern. > De haut en bas pronouncement ends. Yup - Brearley and Gower are of course famous Yorkshiremen

looking ominous though forecast isn't good - I reckon they'll go for it for the rest of the day and put us in with 150-170 lead

:(

First one in! Yaaeh. Right, Cmon Scenic Blast

Me too to repeat our shared luck yesterday...maybe

I think the ball is swinging for the first time - Andersen top english wicket taker and a result are looking nice bets!

By 'my bar' you really mean 'my life' don't you

signposted beyond belief - No reward points, awful, 0/10, see me afterwards.

He may indeed MM - I didn't back him though. Only one today - Alanbrooke, Ascot 2pm ( testing a theory on favourites on good ground in early races.) Holding on to my cricket bet (laying the draw) although tempted to trade off some of my risk...

It's easy You can do with a beer in your hand There's fire involved Woman don't get a chance

..have they got one of those bars you push beer down?

But cn you not see that when you post a deliberately emotive 'prejudiced' statement connected to 'most' after someone has pointed out that factually the 'most' might be true for the UK.... at some level the poster may feel that you are linking that statement with their post? Am i being over sensitive? (seems unlikely :))