alice

Sephiroth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mellor was the story - but I don't think it was > ever a real thing - an concoction by Max Clifford > is my recollection not untrue. I can remember seeing the photo

I am a woman and you do not advocate for me.

Nobody under 30 reads this forum.

D.C. traffic has intensified at edg ll junction tweaking won?t work. A new plan with this junction at the heart of changes opening the village.

DulwichCentral Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > @Alice Dulwich Village / Court Lane is central to > 20 schools in the area with people travelling > through from all directions to all schools. You > seem to want it opened up to cars and lorries > making it dangerous and polluted again? a > All those people walking or cycling through now - > what would they do? Go back to driving? DC The East Dulwich Grove junction with Lordship lane is central to 20+ schools, nurseries, Hospital as well many bus routes. It also has higher density housing and a much lower % percentage of homes with gardens. Why not start from there.

Tweaks won?t work. The central conceit of the Dulwich LTN was flawed from the start. Dulwich Village/Court Lane junction cannot be the centre of the new plan

When you are not listened to or your words changed to suit others then it is natural to become exasperated.

this stress on great agreement on principles is a way of avoiding the strong criticism of measures.

My gut was majority LTNnegative

Anyone struggling to get into the southwark zoom ltn meeting?

The unanswered question is why do the main beneficiaries live in the least polluted, most wealthy part of Southwark?

The arrest was made within days of attack. Certainly better than ?terrible?

Dulwich hill police on twitter say a 53 year old woman has been arrested.

Resurfacing? Conway again it?ll all have to be redone when the bus and bike lanes go in.

Your logic is strange why on earth would my idea endanger children? With a one way road there?s room for a proper safe bike lane which would be great for children and adults to get to school/work. Whether or not gilkes etc are reclassified is somewhat irrelevant. Underhill road is narrower and has buses. P4 could be rerouted this would avoid the ridiculously slow journey in the south circular section of the route. This route would still go past the lordship Lane estate and provide an easy link for people who live in the library section of dulwich to get to lewisham or Brixton. If you want people to get out of cars as you say, you have to give a little and having a useful bus route would help along with proper bike lanes

Well Court could make a pair with Calton, using gilkes close(?) to get to village. Rather than as before where poor traffic lights etc create faux congestion. Tho my preference is to make court lane a bus route and have a proper bike lane. Gilkes and Calton could each be 1 way.

That will change when ?school streets? arrive

Deleted.

Deleting my reply.

None of us know what else was going on that night.

I never said it wasn?t awful or should t be investigated. I said that a hard decision was made. Maybe that decision was wrong. I don?t know.

With all the police cuts hard decisions have to be made. This crime, horrid tho it is, seems to have finished and the person was no longer in danger. An ongoing crime would take precedence.

There was a major police event in east dulwich road yesterday evening - maybe that was prioritised

Many thanks but I?ve sorted the correct size now.

I have said before dulwich LTNs were never about bikes. Where are the bike lanes? its about making Dulwich 'more villagey' quote from Dulwich councillor.