Jump to content

alice

Member
  • Posts

    3,813
  • Joined

Everything posted by alice

  1. One way Melbourne towards Kings would allow ambulances to avoid Lordship Lane. Excellent idea.
  2. Why speak for the traders when you can speak to them? [perhaps because you know you'd get a different answer] redpost Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Lynne Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Completely agree. Bring back the buses. This is > > just driving trade to supermarkets with > carparks. > > What utter bilge, most parts of the rye are no > further than 200m from a bus stop (bus station / > stops opposite greggs / south end stops outside > tesco express). > > Why not think about the traders on the lane who > can now breathe clean air all day?
  3. School streets with collapsible metal barriers are a simple low cost flexible idea. Why not more of them?
  4. and all their friends are exempt too.
  5. Those pro-LTN are now resorting to poor efforts at humour. Weak.
  6. Iceland + Franklin?s combo served us well.
  7. So who?s getting these? All those who registered? All those in the enhanced area? Both? Or something else?
  8. Its a sad day when a great shop like Franklins has to close.
  9. Heartblock such an excellent post. I think you?ve covered it. Thankyou.
  10. Dulwich C. I should have said principles and logic. Your response has neither.
  11. Sometimes we want to dig down to details to prove a fact. That?s fine but there are principles that underpin decisions about action. That the Dulwich LTNs benefit those already wealthy at the expense of those less privileged is undisputed. How does that fit with Southwark?s Fairer Futures Initiative? (Ps it doesn?t)
  12. does that mean I don't need permission for a balcony at the back of my house.
  13. Very interesting intexas.. Do you know how the 'respondents' were chosen?
  14. Time limited? That?s v clues to me never heard a thing.
  15. It?s not time limited and confusing as seems to be saying 2 contradictory things.
  16. Strange. I shall examine the status of my pro bus comments.
  17. ?A? road designation was made early in the last century-things have changed and so should that designation.
  18. Yes had to go to princess royal tho
  19. Agreed I cycled to work at London Bridge till I changed jobs and couldn?t face rotherhithe tunnel. I drove but switched to Overground as soon as that line was open. If creating new public transport routes would take too long/ ???? then think about rerouting buses/ bikes down shut roads or preferably the reverse.
  20. Has anyone changed their mind about LTNs? And if not what would it take for you to do so?
  21. Sieve sugar soap or flour will reveal tracks overnight which should lead to blockable entry points.
  22. Raeburn Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > alice Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Pathetic- a cycle ride for women. > > > What do you mean by this Alice? Genuinely > interested to understand your perspective. just an instant, gut reaction.
  23. This debate is about just that Dulwich. If you disagree take your future comments to the lounge.
  24. LTN BH There is nothing wrong with most of what you write but nobody seems to be be able to answer the simple question: Why are the dulwich LTNs on the wealthiest part of south Southwark?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...