Jump to content

alice

Member
  • Posts

    3,963
  • Joined

Everything posted by alice

  1. There has never been an answer to why the Dulwich LTNs were positioned to benefit the wealthiest.
  2. Lordship lane estate is directly affected by the traffic in both lordship and the south circular. Stagnant traffic creates the most fumes.
  3. It?s a serious thread. Find fun elsewhere.
  4. Have the market Sunday and open the road like northcross.
  5. This Freedom is temporary. So we can enjoy the summer and be ready for autumn lockdown.
  6. Absolutely spot on.
  7. LTNBH care to tell us your street name?
  8. Such very sad news.
  9. BB Agree Greendale us a great route. But don?t assume others motives for not wanting LTNs in that particular Dulwich location.
  10. BB Agree Greendale us a great route. But don?t assume motives for not wanting LTNs in that particular Dulwich location.
  11. Who are the people who drive their children to school? Aren?t most people at work then? Walking to a state primary is usually less than five min walk judging by local catchment areas.
  12. The can has already been kicked into my road. And where and when is walking to school dangerous?
  13. I think it's entirely in keeping with the rest of lordship.
  14. The relative clean up costs are irrelevant. Dulwich LTNs are unfair, unjust and will be removed.
  15. Awful. sorry to hear that.
  16. If pollution has created giant children then yes.
  17. LTNs are over in Dulwich. Your mutual back patting is making no difference. The consultation is over. It was a ?nice? but it didn?t work for enough people.
  18. Had the same response in townley a while back
  19. Walked in to Belair yesterday at 19.50 couldn?t book in as there was ?a problem? online. They saw us straight away brilliant service.
  20. Patting each other on the back May feel good but is not going to change the fact that LTNs are finished in DV.
  21. Do you have to have symptoms to get a walk in test
  22. Yes change the centre of LTN from Village/ Court/Calton to the junction of EDG with Lordship Lane.
  23. So boohoo you say the majority of ltns are in the poorer areas? So what! Dulwich KTNs are certainly not. So you?d support the removal of Dulwich LTNs then?
  24. Do you think a lifetime labour voter would shift to Tory Bailey over ltns? It was a desperate move for a loser. But locally I won?t be voting Labour again. They have betrayed the people they stand for. What happened to Fairer Futures for all? It?s not LTNs as a principle but where they were placed in Dulwich and who benefited that was the breaking point.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...