alice

So, given all of the above, what information can be collected and trusted.

Just walked down both roads. 2 cyclists.

My enormous clumps of frogspawn have disappeared leaving a tiny blob. Could they have sunk just before tadding?

used the 'humps' argument. but p13 handles them well on underhill as does the 63.

Maybe some buses need routes changed. For East west local travel the p4 rerouted down court lane. Quicker and will catch more people. Doesn?t cost ?millions.

Limit that on street parking to roads with off street parking. Then you have a nice court bus lane.

Tramsformational but the price and time is too much. It?s not going to happen.

Tramsformational but the price and time is too much. It?s not going to happen.

That?s weird.

No I think she?s lovely.

Malumbo- your use of a certain phrase above shows you have a lot in common with certain LCC members.

What? She was a random person just planting trees?

Metallic, Rockets has kindly provided a link above.

I feel things are turning.

good

Very interesting bit of data on twitter. OK it?s by dulwich alliance but nevertheless worth reading.

Then what would be the point of adding roads to drop down? Wonder when / why that decision was made? Too late to update flyers? The Southwark magazine only mentions LTN review discretely in smallish print ?look out for your local review?.

Great to hear thanks

Better bus routes = Fewer cars

It?s for the newer greener 185/176 route. Getting NHS staff to kings faster. And Yes its wide enough, if you doubt that check the 63 bus.

What may be true of some other LTNs is not true of Dulwich LTNs.

But all wards are not the same. It was a pity to hear Dulwich village was given ?1850 for ongoing costs of hanging baskets. I had thought such costs were not allowed under the rules of CGF. Either way I think this 'equal allocation' principle should be looked at. Money should follow need.

thankyou Legalalien. I wonder if I would have seen this otherwise and I wonder what strategies the council are using to reach non internet users.

Reroute the 176 and 185 down Melbourne grove. Enough space for bike and bus lanes. Would cut 10 mins easy off journey time

You say improving air will take place by some sort of bottom up approach. loads of individuals making certain changes. that sounds a bit like thatcher when she said there's no such thing as society. Bottom up is not enough it must work in unison with a top down approach [government, council] which does not favour the needs of the already healthy, the already rich. I never listened to Vine's show but when you describe a caller as 'angry and ranting' it shows you are not really interested in debate. The local issue is very clear. Walk down lordship past the lordship lane estate the fumes are sickening. Look down he glorious boulevard of court lane. 1 bike and a pram. The inequity of this particular LTN is astonishing and bringing in a generalist argument about the environment does not work. But I congratulate you this is definitely my longest post ever.