KidKruger

Saw this guy down CP rd yesterday late afternoon, studiously scanning doorsteps from side to side as he slowly pedalled along. Had a black rucksack on - which wasn?t empty !!

Pumpkin soup is the one.

They?re for sale at (what was) Franklin?s farm shop - or they were 10mins ago. (Talk to your mortgage advisor first tho 🤣).

Wasn?t there a distinction between Mister and Master ? Mr and ?M..? ?

Brian thanks for the loan of that equipment when you saw I was struggling to complete my bay front restoration, and thanks for the free advice and materials/process suggestions, made a massive difference and improved the final outcome. Well chuffed !!

You could try Linda Marchant, GojoRyu karate practitioner, she?s on t?internet. Has a school in Tooting I believe, but may be able to schedule bespoke sessions. I recommend her cos she?s an effective well-trained practical martial artist. Any bloke trying to mug her would have serious regrets afterwards !!

You could try Linda Marchant, GojoRyu karate practitioner, she?s on t?internet. Has a school in Tooting I believe, but may be able to schedule bespoke sessions. I recommend her cos she?s an effective well-trained practical martial artist. Any bloke trying to mug her would have serious regrets afterwards !!

Typo there I think IlonaM - 2nd sentence/timings ?

My dog will never learn to live with it, he shakes like an epileptic with fear, he doesn?t understand there?s no actual danger, his eyes say ?danger? despite reassurances from us and despite him never being harmed by anything to do with fireworks. You?d think he?d get the pattern, but he doesn?t. But that?s his and my family?s problem, not the problem of the firework-letter-offers. The firework-letter-offers have every right to do what they are entitled to.

Azalea Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Franklin?s allows dogs. In the restaurant area (which was what I was referring to) ?

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I do not understand why people would take their > dog to a Pub Restaurant. > > Would you take your Dog to an Indian Restaurant.. > ?? Indian restaurants wouldn?t allow it, so it?s not an option. Pub restaurants are a bit more casual. However, I doubt Franklin?s would allow a dog - happy to be corrected. Anyway, Spart?s text seemed to suggest there is more at play than an innocent question (though I?m too naive to discern exactly what !).

Sounds like distraction. Separate issues. Pursue the issues around quality of work, your rights don?t get deleted because of some bun-fight over historic layout. Your rights remain intact, perhaps they need reminding. Angelina Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > it's a long story - I have complained about the > quality of the work that the Property Management > company have done - as there is damage to my flat > from blocked drains, leaking roof and from leaks > from flat above. > Their response is to challenge me on something > that happened a long time ago rather than address > the issues. > > I have a solicitor but just asking here. > I will check the lease but it's really if the > layouts of the property are set if a freehold > changes hands.

Could be that so many years have passed, with no complaints from other lessees, no negative impact to the rest of the block, that it?d be very difficult for any enforcement to occur. Even something stipulated in a lease or other agreement, if a long time passes with no challenge, in some cases the original rules become moot. I?d clarify what negative impacts the other lessees are concerned about, and if no negs it may be worth politely declining and leaving it to the rest of them to try and get enforcement if they?re so keen. It?ll be expensive for them and may well not be fruitful. What are their actual concrete concerns apart from simply protocol/procedure. Seems impractical if no physical problem caused by the 2003 layout.

One tree hill.

This was spotted/mentioned back in March. ?E? for Effort in persistency !

Oh I don?t know that counsellors are to blame, these days it seems that any disagreement around lifestyle/politics/climate change/anything means direct confrontation.

Artemis Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > heartblock Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > It isn't a win and this area has become a > rather > > unpleasant place to live, partly due to idling > > traffic, but mainly because of the mud-slinging > > and unpleasant language. Elderly people > insulted > > and Twitter accounts taking a moral high ground > > while victimising local businesses. > > Agreed - it?s all very sad and seems to have > brought out the very worst in people. Hardly surprising though - implement an unjust experiment, for the benefit of a very few (who happen to appear to have privilege), deny it?s negative impacts, obfuscate or misrepresent the data to justify your actions, get found out, deny/ignore allegations, meanwhile leaving those most affected to figure/fight it out while you whistle.

Worth knocking doors sharpish.

goldilocks Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Interesting ab29 - as the timed restrictions > aren't in place on the weekend. Maybe, you're > just noticing traffic more because its become a > focus? > > The monitoring for Lordship Lane at the bottom end > shows a fall. I see you disagree with this > monitoring because your eyes tell you a different > story but the data tells us that traffic has > fallen on pretty much every boundary road. The > exception is East Dulwich Grove but the last > monitoring released seems to show that even on > there the traffic effects aren't the same along > the whole street. Depends what you mean by ?traffic?. Congestion ? Actual no. of cars ? The whole road network from EDR/Grove Vale down LL to Harvester and beyond is packed nowadays. Therefore there will be less throughput / vehicle count. That?s why CPR has now become one of the most dangerous roads in ED - drivers realise they can skip LL congestion and hurtle down a road with no traffic lights and only one Zebra crossing. Obvious alternative. If this is LTN success then it?s only a success for the street residents where the closures have occurred. It?s seems illogical to me that displacement is viewed as reduction, but how the Councillors work (and whatever devices have been operating in the background) I know not. Congestion has increased significantly in several places so I don?t see a win here. Not for the community as a whole, anyway.

Angelina Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think it's ok. > > I have nothing to hide and trust my Government to > do it properly The Govt?s track record so far on ?Brexit? and the Pandemic would indicate we can have every confidence in their abilities.

Let?s Trade Neighbourhoods.

Not a fan of the Rye Lane (ethnic) cleansing intentions. But money will rule. 😭

Yeah if your car is not ULEZ compliant.

Utter madness.

I often see them sat outside where dog owners are eating. Dunno about inside. Best call them !