KidKruger

Thanks Eileen.

I?d like to think AJ would get the win, but from their backgrounds Usyk looked like the more experienced and talented man.

Has pressure reduction can happen - check with yer neighbours..

Yeah absolutely. Huggers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KidKruger Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > People with non ULEZ-compliant cars in the > newly > > expanded zone should be getting relief from > daily > > use charges from October. > > If you can?t buy fuel, you can?t be polluting > the > > zone, right ? 🤣 > I believe you only pay the charge when you drive > the car, not when it sits unused

? Men have no idea how lucky they are compared to women when it comes to casual safety? My point exactly. TheCat - why should anyone be concerned with the abduction, assault, rape, murder, subsequent dismemberment, then hiding of the chopped-up body of a woman who was simply walking home from a social evening with her friends. I think you?re an intentionally provocative bastard. It?s not clever.

You mean the Village Carbuncle ?

?All lives matter?

AJ was outmanoeuvred, out-punched, out-thought, and outclassed. No shame in that, Usyk is an anomaly like Lomachenko was. I disagree with some who say no point in a re-match, AJ has a punchers chance and in fact did catch Usyk decently a couple of times. Thanks to Wilder crying like a baby pulled off the teat and stopping the AJ v Fury fight (which I think would have happened by now) - that fight is very unlikely. Wilder would have far less chance than AJ of beating Usyk. Fury - I don?t know about this one, how does Usyk prepare for such unorthodoxy ?! Either way, it?s all been shaken up and AJ will need to climb the slippery ladder again, I imagine tho he?ll still leapfrog those waiting in line, such as Whyte.

Nope, totally believable, whether true or not. Along with ?you can now benefit from restricted travel and work across Europe, you lucky, lucky, bastards?. Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sephiroth Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > So we need 6 figure numbers of drivers to come > > here and help out > > > > So we will be grateful right? > > > > ?Home Secretary @pritipatel announces 3 month > > Visas for 5000 drivers & then sets up task > force > > to deport EU lorry drivers who remain U.K. > after > > 24th Dec-She said ?It is a special privilege > for > > lorry drivers to be able come here & work & it > > shouldn?t be abused?🇬🇧🙈 > > Did she actually say that Seph? It's unbelievable > if true.

People with non ULEZ-compliant cars in the newly expanded zone should be getting relief from daily use charges from October. If you can?t buy fuel, you can?t be polluting the zone, right ? 🤣

If you?re on foot and want to fill up a Jerry can, how do you even do that when there?s a queue of cars without getting assaulted ?! Go and stand in the road behind the last car in the line ? 🙄

There is no petrol shortage. The transport minister said so. No fuel shortage, says transport secretary https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-58696999

Keeping up appearances.

So is there a shortage of petrol only caused (at least locally) by panic buying / hoarding ?

I?d like to see Usyk win, we?ll find out soon enough.

Spot on Penguin, it's a dismal state of affairs and we should be ashamed as a society that this is the norm AND that the authorities can't be arsed / are not able to address it AND that criminals don't get punished severely for this kind of activity. Taliban seem to not tolerate thieves, from what I read today (though I'd suggest that's a step too far).

Is Saturday?s AJ v Usyk contest simply a case of A good big man beats a Good smaller man ? How do you see it panning out ?? The other mention I?ll squeeze in here is Amanda Serrano. Deadly boxer, very possibly may come up TWO weights to fight Katie Taylor next year.

Sorry wasn?t questioning or accusing, it was more just taking it down to a basic level to delete the unknowns.

Why gamble ? Just switch off what we?re not using. womanofdulwich Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Well as you are all so informed.Does leaving > things like the and laptops on standby really use > a lot of energy? > A lot of energy wasted in my household arguing > this O

nice to see someone actually deals with it like that. SpringTime Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KidKruger Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Surely everyone will use as much as they can or > > can afford to. > > Nope, KK. We'll use as little as we can and be > able to spend more on bills if we change our > minds. 18? is easily warm enough indoors. If not > then ask Mother Nature for some proper clothes.

tbf - the basic rule 'if you don't need it to burn energy then don't enable it' pretty much deals with it doesn't it ? If people genuinely can't figure out whether they're burning energy they don't need to, it'll be sorted after a couple of bills. That's just the reality, unless I'm missing something ! Nigello Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You'd think that, but perhaps some don't know the > best way to reduce energy use. It may sound silly, > but how many know, for example, how much energy a > charging phone/laptop or TV set on standby uses, > or how much could be saved by turning the > radiators down from 5 to 4, etc.? > Fuel price increases may push people to find out > and economise.

Surely everyone will use as much as they can or can afford to.

Corrupt and duplicitous by the looks of it ?

Nice one ianr

Thanks Alex