alex_b

Call the police on 101 and report it, then if the owner contacts the police they can pass on the information.

Which was basically the point that a dozen of us made when we objected to the double yellows. Unfortunately we were ignored and "our" councillors don't seem particularly interested in engaging with us. This is in contrast with the ED councillors (including James Barber) who blocked the stupid proposal at their community council.

It's the Lane Ward councillors, I've emailed them and heard nothing unsurprisingly.

I think it's partially that, partially because the shape allows vehicles (especially larger ones) to drive up it and trap their wheel arches and partially because it's completely black. Adding some reflective material would be an easy touch to improve matters. That said unlike posts it can't be bent or broken and just needs re-concreting in every month or so, it would probably be more expensive for the council to endless replace damaged bollards. This is probably why they switched the tall bollards out for this one.

It would be a nice thought, but I'm not sure one way would help much with this particular problem. A large vehicle can't safely navigate that corner whichever direction it is going. Unfortunately the council seem completely disinterested in solving this. They did a traffic survey over a year ago, said there was a problem and then have done nothing since.

Well a massive Cedars Assist lorry towing another flat bed truck just ran straight over it tonight and broke it out of its concrete. What is this the 6th time this year it has had to be concreted back in. Those double yellow lines will just encourage that type of vehicle to try and make the turn rather than back out.Shame the council don't seem interested in solving the issue.

It gets worse; having consulted on double yellows on the North East side of Adys Rd at Nutbrook, they decided to paint them on the South East side too. I've emailed the council (got the usual gibberish reply) and emailed my ward councillors (and have been ignored as per usual). Pretty sure what they've done is unlawful, but I'm not sure I can fight the machine.

I think the other thing (that also happened in my experience in West London in 2009) is that people who don't absolutely need move to just don't move. So I expect there will be a dwindling of supply as well as of demand, with more sellers being ones in 'distress' who need to move.

I'd also like to recommend Billy. He and his brother have just fitted a new boiler, hot water tank, underfloor heating and a number of new radiators, as well as basically replumbing the house! He was really competitively price and more importantly has fantastic attention to detail (OCD he says). He dealt admirably with our less than helpful main contractor and worked around the delays in the build schedule. I wouldn't hesitate to use him again.

Indeed. "We have received your well thought out objection (and many like it) and have decided to do what we were going to do anyway."

So I just got a rejection notice from the council, looks like the lines are going ahead despite our complaints. The message they sent was: --- Determination of statutory objection to H/ND/TMO 1516-041 relating to the double yellow lines on junctions proposal for BOROUGH-WIDE JUNCTION PROTECTION: THE LANE WARD. I am writing to inform you of the council?s decision following your objection to the above proposed Order(s), notice of intent to make that order is made on 14 July 2016 . In accordance with Regulation 13 of The Local Authorities' Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996[1][1] the council has considered your objection. The decision has been taken by the relevant decision maker as set out in the Southwark Council?s constitution[2][2]. Consideration of the objection Your objection was considered by Peckham and Nunhead community council on 29 June 2016. Summary of decision In consideration of the objection, the Peckham and Nunhead community council has: decided that the objections, made in relation to proposed waiting restrictions (double yellow lines) on unrestricted junctions and upgrade junctions with single yellow lines in The Lane Ward be rejected and that the proposals approved at the 4 February 2016 community council be implemented.

Huggers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ten metres of double yellow junction lines on > small residential roads with multiple junctions > into other small residential roads, will have a > huge impact on parking. > > Residents in my area (Bellenden/Adys/Nutbrook maze > of small roads) have resisted residents parking > and actively opposed it in two surveys. A way of > Southwark changing minds would be to put more > pressure on parking which is what these double > yellow lines will do. > > I notice there are already double yellow lines on > a lot of our local junctions, but not ten meters, > and to the eye this looks like more than adequate > length. > > We have a problem with huge lorries being directed > through our small streets by their sat navs. We > have asked the council to discourage this with > signposting 'unsuitable for large vehicles'. They > often get stuck on the corners. Are these double > yellow lines an attempt to solve this, making > corners clear for huge lorries to turn? We would > rather have the signs. > > I think the lines are a cynical attempt to bring > in Residents parking by stealth. I'm also an Bellenden/Adys/Nutbrook resident and the problem is lorries and coaches (and others) using the roads as a rat-run to avoid Rye Lane not parking by residents near the intersections (most of which already have some junction protection). Everything the council does to the roads round here seems to make lives worse for the residents whilst doing nothing to reduce the traffic volume or impact. For instance the speed bumps just mean that rather than having an large lorry drive speed past my bedroom at 11pm, I now get a lorry at speed crashing over a speedbump at 11pm (ten times the noise but no improvement in safety or reduction in traffic volume). I was in correspondence with an officer about taking action against lorries and coaches in the area, they conducted a traffic survey but have now left the council and their replacement hasn't replied to my queries about what follow up action is proposed. I objected in writing, got a pathetic copy and paste "explanation" and renewed my objection. I've yet to hear when the public meeting will be, I intend to turn up and object if possible.

Huggers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > We get them jammed in Nutbrook Street and have > asked council to put advisory sign so lorries > don't even start down that route. As for ringing > the companies, there are loads of them, new every > time! An HGV ripped out the bollard on the corner of Nutbrook/Adys on Thursday, oil and concrete all down the road! They really need to find a way to close this as shortcut for HGVs/coaches before some more serious damage occurs. Has the council ever looked at this when they did the other one-way changes?