BrandNewGuy

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi BNG, > In the past I created a thread for every > consultation I came across affecting ED but was > discouraged by Admin from continuing this. It > could swamp the forum. One thread could get really > jumbled. But not if it has its own section. Admin?

It's a 'no' for me, alas, but Mrs BNG will be there.

Hmmm, every village has an idiot. Any suggestions? ;-)

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Look at the boris bike map - a massive hole in > provision over SE London. > Look at the cycle superhighways - a massive hole > in provision over SE London > Look at the tube map - a massive hole in provision > over SE London > > It's really not good enough But I'd suggested that things have improved. 'Good enough' is a difficult one to pin down - particularly if you moved here knowing full well the existing provision. As for Boris bikes, they're not really a practcal commuting option from here for getting into the West End, City or Canary Wharf. And as for cycle superhighways, I suspect that any mass use of bikes will happen not simply on cycle superhighways but on all roads. I wonder if a concentration on superhighways is similar to the misguided postwar designs for car use to build motorways and dual carriageways through and into city centres.

Couldn't agree more. Perhaps Southwark Council might like to have a dedicated section of the forum to post details of all consultations that affect East Dulwich. Councillors?

As consultations go, it's not bad ? there are no leading questions along the lines of 'Do you think extra traffic calming measures should be in place?' etc. It seems the council have rowed back somewhat from the community council's initially hasty reaction.

Glad you liked it, Foxy. Perversely, as a real ale drinker, I don't mind if they're occasionally intermittent ? by midweek any pub that's much busier at weekends will probably have a few casks that are getting too 'old' if they haven't sold out. I'd rather the manager takes them off sale than carries on serving flat stale beer - which is what happens in a number of alleged 'real ale' pubs I know.

Another bus etiquette rage-inducer: one empty seat left on the 176 from Waterloo yesterday evening. Politely ask young woman to move her bag. She does so grudgingly and I sit down. A number of stops further on, a ?double seat? becomes empty about four or five rows in front of where we?re sitting. Young woman next to me pointedly puts down her book and stares at it, as if suggesting that I should move there. Sod off ? I?ll decide that, not you. If you have such a loathing of other people using ?your? bus, get a bloody taxi next time.

What's more, Mrs E has failed to disclose her past as the housekeeper at Rawlinson End.

But London Bridge services are more frequent than they were in 'the old days' ? when there was a skeleton Saturday and evening service and nothing at all on a Sunday.

It's not perfect but it's far better than it used to be. We didn't even have the Overground a few years ago.

dbboy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > We need to oppose local station ticket closures at > all costs. They need to be staffed to deal with > problems, queries, enquiries, issues and ensure > the public's safety. But as I said earlier, they plan on keeping staff at stations - just not in ticket offices. Whether they'll hold to that, who knows, but the current proposal is not to remove staff from stations altogether.

Lynne Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > They've only just spent all that money on Denmark > Hill > It's going to make all these stations feel very > secure for passengers! About these changes, Great Northern, Southern and Thameslink say: "Where sales from ticket offices are low, we want to bring staff out from behind the windows and on to the concourse to work where they?re needed most, as Station Hosts, providing assistance and helping sell tickets from ticket machines and their own handheld devices. All the affected stations will be staffed for longer as a result ? at all but two they would be staffed from the very first train of the day to the very last, seven days a week. This will drive other customer benefits ? we?ll also be able to increase the opening hours of facilities passengers have told us are important, such as waiting rooms, toilets and lifts." So perhaps the stations might feel more secure than they are now. http://www.thameslinkrailway.com/about-us/news/modernising-our-stations/

And interesting that last year wasn't the highest in terms of numbers. Perhaps the chaos at London Bridge during the first half of the year made people change their commute for good.

KateA69 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Having spoken to about 30 retailers today in Herne > Hill they are all concerned about their > livelihoods. Just Williams isn't just about the > kids, its about the whole community, and people's > livelihoods, their jobs. It takes a huge amount > of guts, innovation to run your own business. So > to totally focus on yummy mummy comments is to > belittle the issue. Sure profits have to be made, > but its about being reasonable and balanced. Do > we really all want a community taken over by the > big profiteering companies, that drive out the > very shops that drew us to these great places we > all live in. What happens when not only these > shops go, but some of the essential shops, such as > the local laundrette, for those that don't have > their own washing machine, the local garage to fix > cars, the local shoe mender - where we will get > this stuff done - or are we looking at the next > level of socio-economic cleansing? Using the kids > as an excuse to switch-off frankly doesn't cut it > as a reason to switch-off from this campaign when > its people's jobs at stake. Everyone has a right > to express an opinion, whether they are adults or > children, and good on them for learning to speak > out now when they are young, and not focus on more > petty issues and become cynical adults. Agree. There's something childish about the 'have a pop at the toffs' tone of some of these comments. Tiresome.

Had a very good (50% off) meal at The Cherry Tree last night ? well cooked and served up with a smile. Fair value even at the full price. We'll definitely be back to eat ? we already like the bar area and the beer selection but hadn't tried the food before.

That pointless ramp in EDG by the corner west of Dulwich Hospital is crazy. It also has next to it the remnants of tactile paving for a crossing that never happened. Probably because it would have been suicidal to use...

But that's what I suggested they were addressing? Yes?

For purposes of tree removal and site clearance, the nesting season is taken to be 1st March ? 31st July inclusive, but the nesting period for specific birds at specific sites might start before this and extend beyond it. In this particular case, I would say that crows, magpies, blackbirds and wood pigeons might start breeding earlier than 1st March, but not as early as the end of January. And as Sue says, the law in this case is to do with breeding and not using nests as roosts during the winter ? which is rare for these species in any case.

Just to clarify, the consultation addresses the issue of traffic islands: "In order to facilitate the extension along Red Post Hill, we would need to make alterations to the traffic islands to enable buses to use the road. We would also need to extend the double yellow lines at the bottom Red Post Hill junction with Sunray Avenue, to enable buses to easily continue serving along Red Post Hill. The length of the disabled parking bay on Red Post Hill junction with Denmark Hill will need to be reduced. However, this reduction in length will still allow one vehicle to park in this bay."

Yep, definitely a bot.

Is this a bot?

Haha! I love it when you go all serious, Louisa. And if you read the Daily Mail, you'll think that just stepping out of your house is a deadly activity. Everyone knows there's a *risk* of food poisoning from oysters (they're raw, after all). But put it in perspective. There are nearly a million recorded cases of serious food poisoning a year in the UK and about 500 deaths. An insignificant number of those involve oysters.

It doesn't really 'say it all' though, does it. If you looked at who gets poisoned by chicken in this country, my hunch would be it's probably not exclusively toffs. Is champagne similarly more dangerous than cheap prosecco, I wonder...?

"The test used to detect the virus was very sensitive and most of the positive samples contained very low levels of the virus. The FSA says that its test cannot distinguish between infectious and non-infectious types of norovirus, and it is not known how much norovirus a person would need to consume before it made them ill." Nothing to see here, move along...